Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 13 of about 5,300 results (0.329 seconds)

Jan 10 2006 (HC)

Lala Ram Vs. Smt. Vidya Wati @ Vidya Devi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

Reported in : (2006)143PLR352

..... fee on the plaint. the learned trial court dismissed the said application while observing that case of the plaintiff falls within the provisions of section 7(iv)(c) read with section 7(v)(b) of the court fees. act, 1870 and the plaintiff is required to affix the court fee ten times the land revenue assessed in respect of the land in question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (HC)

Rakesh @ Kake Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi (State)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ844; 127(2006)DLT363; 2006(86)DRJ762

..... read with cfsl report, it can be safely concluded that the prosecutrix had been subjected to forced sexual intercourse by the appellant and co-accused, within the meaning of section 376 of ipc. the contradictions, which are sought to be brought up by the defense are immaterial and of no consequence. these are bound to happen when evidence in ..... clearly come that the appellant and the other accused both of them had committed sexual assault, namely, rape. she had also deposed that when one accused was doing wrong act, the other was pointing the screw driver. she also deposed that first rakesh had left the house and thereafter sunil left, which is in conformity with the deposition by ..... both the accused but on being asked, who is rakesh, she had pointed towards the appellant sunil, who is no more. she also did not depose that the act of rape had been committed on her twice. the story regarding the consumption of naphthalene balls in an attempt to suicide, has been found not to be supported by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (HC)

Highway Advertising Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

Reported in : IV(2006)BC492; 2007(1)CTLJ251(P& H); (2006)142PLR537

D.K. Jain, C.J.1. By this writ petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner questions the legality and validity of the decision taken by the officials of the Northern Railway, respondents No. 2 to 5 herein, to award limited advertising rights in three parks, in the circulating area of Chandigarh Railway Station, in favour of respondent No. 6.2. Briefly stated, the background facts are as follows:The petitioner, a sole proprietary concern, is engaged in the business of outdoor advertising in and around the city of Chandigarh. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Northern Railway, Ambala Cantt., respondent No. 3 herein, had awarded to the petitioner the work of development and maintenance of three parks of Chandigarh Railway Station and in consideration therefor, it was entitled to display 14 Glow Sign Boards of different sizes for a period of 3 years. On the expiry of the said period, respondent No. 3 issued a fresh notice inviting tenders (for ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (HC)

Natwarlal Chhotulal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR166]; (2006)1GLR803

Jayant Patel, J.1. Mr. Pujara, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to delete respondent No.4 as the action of respondent No.4 is not challenged. Permission granted. Rule. Mr. Desai, learned AGP waives service of Rule for Respondents No. 1 and 2 and Mr. Munshaw, learned Counsel waives service of Rule for Respondent No. 3 and with the consent of both the sides matters are finally heard today.2. In all the petitions common questions are involved and, therefore, they are being dealt with by this common order.3. The petitioners have preferred these petition to quash and set aside the action of the respondent in denying the benefits of inter-district transfer to the petitioners from Dang District to Valsad on the ground that the petitioners concerned have availed the benefits of inter-district transfer in the past prior to the Government Resolutions dated 8.4.1999 and 4.6.2004. The petitioners have also prayed to declare that the benefit of inter-district transfer cannot be denie...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (HC)

Bharat Gupta Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

Reported in : (2006)142PLR518

..... candidate in applying for admission and/or in appearing in an entrance test, (for admission against the 85% state quota seats for the mbbs course), constitutes an act, of having obtained the benefit of residence in such state.11. the aforesaid issue may be examined on the basis of a hypothetical illustration (derivable from the ..... are satisfied, that while adjudicating the controversy raised in manisha bonsai's case (supra), this court did not have the occasion to examine, whether or not, the act of a candidate in applying for or appearing in an entrance test conducted by another state, would per-se amount to having availed the benefit of residence in ..... recognized dental colleges of haryana.2. for children of employees of haryana govt./pensioners of haryana govt./ employees of statutory bodies/corporations established by or under an act of the state of haryana, certificate to this effect issued by head of the office.3. for all other candidates:-a domicile certificate issued by the district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (HC)

Rana Ahmad and ors. Vs. Mangal @ Mangal Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

Reported in : II(2006)ACC335

narendre kumar jain, j.1. heard learned counsel for the parties.2. these two appeals, under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 are directed against the judgment/award dated 6.8.1993 passed by the motor accident claims tribunal, sambhar lake, jaipur in motor accident claim case nos. 527 1992 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (TRI)

Aasu Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

..... like indentor's/trader's commission which generally in the textile trade is... which are relevant in determining the assessable value of the imported goods under section 14 of the customs act, 1962. keeping all these factors in mind it has been decided that in case the difference between the values indicated in the s.o. and ..... in the following paras may be taken into account by all commissioners of this zone while determining the correct assessable value of the said items under section 14 of the customs act, 1962. 2. for the last para of the standing order reading as the above practice of valuation of above items must be adopted by all ..... and allow the appeals.office of the chief commissioner of customs, new custom house, ballard estate mumbai- 400 001.sub.:- valuation of certain standard goods of section xi of customs tariff act - instructions regarding.it has been noticed that polyester chips, poy, pfy, psf, acrylic fibre, viscose staple fibre and silk are being assessed at varying rates .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Kallar Kahar, Sub-account of Fii

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

..... the interim directions were revoked on 12/6/2004 for the reasons stated therein.2.1 subsequently, a show cause notice dated 30.6.04 under section 11 and 11b of sebi act, 1992 read with regulation 11 of sebi(prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market)regulations, 2003 was issued to kkil advising it ..... , it is represented that having regard to the order dated june 12, 2004, no fresh interim directions under section 11 and 11b of sebi act could be passed. also, no final directions under section 11 and 11b of the sebi act read with regulations 11 and 12 of the sebi (prohibition of fraudulent & unfair trade practices relating to securities market ..... of cit v. east coast commercial co.ltd. air (1967) sc 768 (kedia family case) in the context of section 23a of the indian income tax act, 1922 wherein the question was whether kedia family had acted in concert to control the affairs of the concerned company. in the facts of that case, there was no evidence of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2006 (FN)

United States Vs. Georgia

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-10-2006

..... one doubts that 5 grants congress the power to enforce the provisions of the amendment by creating private remedies against the states for actual violations of those provisions. section 5 authorizes congress to create a cause of action through which the citizen may vindicate his fourteenth amendment rights. id. , at 559 560 (scalia, j., ..... subject to longer terms of imprisonment than other prisoners); 2 house committee on education and labor, legislative history of public law 101 336: the americans with disabilities act, 101st cong., 2d sess., p. 1331 (comm. print 1990) (stating that persons with hearing impairments have been arrested and held in jail over night ..... eleventh circuit [january 10, 2006] justice stevens, with whom justice ginsburg joins, concurring. the court holds that title ii of the americans with disabilities act of 1990 validly abrogates state sovereign immunity at least insofar as it creates a private cause of action for damages against states for conduct that violates the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2006 (HC)

Mohan Lal Aggarwal Vs. Atinder Mohan Khosla

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-11-2006

Reported in : (2006)142PLR870

..... . it has also been found that even if the building was let out for non-residential purpose without obtaining permission from the rent controller under section 11 of the act, the demised premises will continue to be a residential building and the landlord will be entitled to seek eviction for the purpose of bonafide requirement. ..... 300/-. the petitioner is running a small scale industry in the demised premises. in the year 1996, the respondent-landlord filed the ejectment application under section 13 of the act for eviction of the petitioner from the demised premises on the grounds of non-payment of rent and personal necessity of his family. the family of ..... satish kumar mittal, j. 1. petitioner mohan lal aggarwal (tenant) has filed this revision petition under section 15(5) of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') against the orders 24.5.2000 and 18.10.2005 passed by the rent controller and the appellate authority respectively ordering his .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //