Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR418
Da Silva, J.1. The challenge in this petition is the judgement of the Administrative Tribunal, Goa, Daman and Diu, dated 10th September, 1990 in Eviction Appeal No. 49/85 which has unsettled the judgment of the Rent Controller, North Division, Panaji, dated 23rd April, 1985 in Case No. RENT/17/82. By the aforesaid judgment the Rent Controller has allowed an application for eviction moved by the original late petitioner Shri Anand Malbari now represented by his legal representatives, the petitioners for eviction of the respondent No. 1. (hereinafter called the respondent) on two grounds of change of user of the premises and causing nuisance to the neighbours as a result whereof the respondent was directed to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises to the said late Anand within a period of sixty days from the date of the receipt of the order.2. The brief facts of the case are that the late Anand by deed dated 1st December, 1973 granted on lease to the respondent the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 733 of 2012 ----------- Sadanand Prasad Singh @ Madan Singh Son of late Kamta Prasad, resident of Amravati Colony, PO & PS Chutia, District- Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party For the petitioner : M/s. Badal Vishal, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Leena Mukherjee & Ruby Pandey, Advocates For the State : Mr. Amresh Kumar, A.P.P. With Criminal Revision No. 597 of 2012 Tulsi Charan Sahu Son of Late Balgovind Sahu, resident of Quarter no. CD-366, Sector II of H.E.C., PO Sector-II, PS- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party For the petitioner : M/s. Sanjay Kumar Pand & Anurag Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. With Criminal Revision No. 665 of 2012 Raj Kishore Sahu Son of Late Shital Sahu, resident of Tupudana, PO & PS- Hatia, District-Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 733 of 2012 ----------- Sadanand Prasad Singh @ Madan Singh Son of late Kamta Prasad, resident of Amravati Colony, PO & PS Chutia, District- Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party For the petitioner : M/s. Badal Vishal, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Leena Mukherjee & Ruby Pandey, Advocates For the State : Mr. Amresh Kumar, A.P.P. With Criminal Revision No. 597 of 2012 Tulsi Charan Sahu Son of Late Balgovind Sahu, resident of Quarter no. CD-366, Sector II of H.E.C., PO Sector-II, PS- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party For the petitioner : M/s. Sanjay Kumar Pand & Anurag Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. With Criminal Revision No. 665 of 2012 Raj Kishore Sahu Son of Late Shital Sahu, resident of Tupudana, PO & PS- Hatia, District-Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 733 of 2012 ----------- Sadanand Prasad Singh @ Madan Singh Son of late Kamta Prasad, resident of Amravati Colony, PO & PS Chutia, District- Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party For the petitioner : M/s. Badal Vishal, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Leena Mukherjee & Ruby Pandey, Advocates For the State : Mr. Amresh Kumar, A.P.P. With Criminal Revision No. 597 of 2012 Tulsi Charan Sahu Son of Late Balgovind Sahu, resident of Quarter no. CD-366, Sector II of H.E.C., PO Sector-II, PS- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party For the petitioner : M/s. Sanjay Kumar Pand & Anurag Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. With Criminal Revision No. 665 of 2012 Raj Kishore Sahu Son of Late Shital Sahu, resident of Tupudana, PO & PS- Hatia, District-Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
1. This writ petition is filed praying to grant the following relief; ..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in commencing and proceeding with the road cutting and laying of pipeline work in Road No.79 and 82 of Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad from 6-5-5015 onwards and the Order of the 5th Respondent vide Lr.No.18/DB/GM(E)/PD- IV/KDWSP/PH-III/Pkg-IX/2015-16/3C dated 23-4-2015 and License No.LandO/M7/52/2015 dated 5.1.2015 granted by the 3rd Respondent to the 9th Respondent permitting blasting and road cutting in the thickly populated residential area of Road Nos.79 and 82, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad without considering and disposing of the objections/representations of the Petitioners dated 17.2.2015 and 7.5.2015, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently, direct the respondents to lay the pipeline from the vast open and uninhabit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. No.52448 of 2017 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.728 of 2015 Arjun Gopal and Ors. versus .Petitioners Respondents JUDGMENT Union of India and Ors. Madan B. Lokur, J.1. A large number of disparate prayers have been made in this public interest litigation initiated by the petitioners under Article 32 of the Constitution, but for the time being we are only concerned with the first prayer. This is to the effect that this Court may issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to ban the use of fireworks, sparklers and minor explosives in any form, during festivals or otherwise.2. The public interest relief sought for is required to be considered from two perspectives: firstly, from preventing air pollution through the bursting IA No.52448/2017 in WP (C) No.728/2015 Page 1 of 44 of fireworks and secondly, by invoking the provisions of the Explosives Act, 1884 and the Explosives Rules, 2008 framed the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1976All266
ORDERP.N. Bakshi, J. 1. The petitioner is a registered Medical Graduate and resides in a house situate in an Ahata known as Chandrika Prasad Bagicha, situate in Mohalla Chunniganj, Kanpur. The Bagicha lies in one of the thickly populated commercial and residential localities of Kanpur. A trust was created in 1917 in respect of this Bagicha and one Mukandi Lal Garg was acting as its Managing Trustee till 22nd March, 1975, nO new trustee has since been appointed.2. The petitioner's case is that Srimati Rabia Begum respondent No. 4, who is a war widow, started raising construction over a portion of the afore-said Bagicha in May, 1975, in close proximity to the petitioner's residential house. On an enquiry the petitioner came to know that she had obtained a lease in respect of 1,000 Sq. yards of land in this Bagicha from Mukandi Lal Garg on 1-2-1975 for the construction of a godown for the storage of 500 gas cylinders. The petitioner's father Dr. M. G. Mangalani also resided with him. The ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1995(2)ALT(Cri)11; 1994(4)BomCR51; (1994)96BOMLR239; 1994CriLJ1447
Ashok Agarwal, J.1. The petitioner in this case is one Abdul Hamid Haji Mohammed @ Hamid Chuva. He has preferred the present Writ Petition invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter alia praying for quashing the proceedings initiated against him under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (28 of 1987) (hereinafter referred to as 'the TADA Act'), on the ground that the provisions of the said Act are not applicable to the fact which are alleged against him. He has also prayed for grant of bail. On the night between 17/18th April, 1993 three persons, which included the petitioner, came to be arrested. The other two who were arrested were Mohamed Hussein Umer Merchant and Mohamed Farooq Mohamed Yusuf Batki. It was found that the three accused were connected with the property known as Picnic Guest House in Juhu. The accused Mohamed Hussein Umer Merchant is the owner of the said property. Apart from him one I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated:03. 04/2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Writ Petition (MD) No.7156 of 2012 And M.P. No.1 of 2012 The Tamil Nadu Fireworks and Amorces Manufacturers Association, Represented by its President S.S.Vijayakumar, 'TANFAMA Centre', 442, Kamarajar Road, Sivakasi-626 123. .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Labour and Employment, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Deputy Chief Controller of Explosives, Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO), FRDC Complex, Sivakasi West-626 124. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned Gazette Notification dated 9.11.2011 of the first respondent herein published in Part III-Section 1(a) pursuant to the G.O.Ms.No.70 dated 26.8.2011 and quash the same as illegal. !For Petitioner ... Mr.M.Sekar ^For Resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :03. 04-2013 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Writ Petition (MD) No.7156 of 2012 And M.P. No.1 of 2012 The Tamil Nadu Fireworks and Amorces Manufacturers Association, Represented by its President S.S.Vijayakumar, 'TANFAMA Centre', 442, Kamarajar Road, Sivakasi-626 123. .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Labour and Employment, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Deputy Chief Controller of Explosives, Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO), FRDC Complex, Sivakasi West-626 124. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned Gazette Notification dated 9.11.2011 of the first respondent herein published in Part III-Section 1(a) pursuant to the G.O.Ms.No.70 dated 26.8.2011 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sekar For Respo...
Tag this Judgment!