Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-04-2006
Reported in : 140(2007)DLT428
..... bodies of their relatives who had died in the bomb blast. pw-64 shri r.c.meena proved the sanction for the prosecution of the accused under section 7 of the explosive substances act, 1908.37. this much is the main evidence of the prosecution relied upon by the prosecution. other witnesses examined were of formal nature and their ..... by confirming the death sentence imposed on the appellant mohd. hussain and the appeal filed by him for setting aside his conviction under sections 302/307 ipc and also under section 3 of the explosive substances act and the sentences imposed upon him vide judgment dated 26-10-04 and order on sentence dated 03-11-04 in sessions case no ..... jehad. on 27-02-98 itself the police had registered a case vide fir no. 49 of 1998 under sections 121/121a ipc and sections 3, 4 & 5 of the explosive substances act as well as under section 25 of the arms act at main delhi railway station. on the basis of information provided by the apprehended terrorists the police made more .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-04-2006
Reported in : 138(2007)DLT759
..... and one mohd. shakeel who was allegedly making the bomb and had supplied the same to mohd. amir khan. charges were framed under sections 302/307/436 ipc and section 3 of the explosive substances act against the appellant only while his co-accused was discharged.4. the substratum of the allegations against the appellant are that on 26. ..... 23.4.2003 and order of sentence dated 8.5.2003 passed by the additional sessions judge, delhi, convicting and sentencing the appellant under sections 302/307/436 ipc and section 3 of the explosive substances act in sessions case no. 104 of 1998 arising out of fir no. 631 of 1997, police station karol bagh, new delhi.2. ..... was seated on the seat beneath which a blast occurred after he vacated the same. this evidence, in no way, holds the appellant responsible for planting of the explosive substance which detonated subsequently. suspicion, howsoever strong it may be, does not take place of evidence. he also submitted that the appellant was arrested in case fir .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Aug-07-2006
Reported in : (2009)20VST873(All)
..... , 4 and 5 of the central sales tax act, were liable to be excluded under section 3f(2) of the act. it was claimed that the goods imported were the electrical goods. the assessing authority held that the goods imported were the cables, terminal unit, explosion proof, heater, panels, transmitter, etc., and not the electrical goods and liable to tax at 10 per cent ..... . in respect of the claim of deduction relating to the imported goods being covered under sections 3, 4 and 5 of the central sales tax act, the assessing authority held that such issue has not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-10-2006
Reported in : 2006CriLJ4234
..... of rs. 5,000/- each in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months each, respondents sankar sundar dutta and pranab nag being convicted under section 3 of the explosive substance act are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years each and to pay a fine of rs. 500 each in default rigorous imprisonment for three months ..... bombs and they charged bombs at uday and naresh and for that reason they are found guilty under section 3 of the explosive substance act. we do not find any material on record to hold the respondents guilty under section 307/34 of the ipc for attempting to murder bombaia alias all reja and kalyan biswas and at ..... sankar sundar dutta and pranab nag were carrying bombs and naturally, apart from the charge under section 302/34 of the ipc both of them are liable to be convicted under section 3 of the explosive substance act.63. the charge under arms act as framed against subhasish mukherjee was disbelieved by the learned trial court since there was no .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-14-2006
Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR103; 2006(6)MhLj552
..... power which has been delegated to the district magistrate cannot be exercised by the additional district magistrate. because the powers of granting consent under section 7 of the explosive substances act, 1908 have been delegated by the central government to the district magistrate.thus, the ratio in the above referred cases is clear that ..... collector. there was no prohibition on the commission to delegate the powers of hearing to the deputy collectors as is permissible under sub-section (2) of section 10a of the act, but the commission delegated these powers to the collectors. the collectors of districts aurangabad and parbhani in the present two matters further delegated ..... petitions on the ground that the state election commissioner did not delegate his powers to the sub divisional officers as authorized under sub-section (2) of section 10a of the act. the action of sub-divisional officers is tried to be justified on behalf of the respondents stating that the election commissioner himself .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Aug-21-2006
Reported in : [2007(1)JCR416(Jhr)]
..... , contains the ingredients of home made bomb. the investigating officer also procured sanction order (ext. 1) from the competent authority for prosecution the appellant and other under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substance act.5. after completion of the investigation, the police submitted chargesheet against the appellant and the other accused. accordingly the cognizance of the offences was taken and in ..... succeeded in proving the following ingredients necessarily required to be proved for constituting an offence under section 5 of the explosive substances act (i) that the substance in question found is explosive substance (ii) that the accused makes or knowingly has in possession or under his control any explosive substance and (iii) that he does so under such circumstances as to give rise to reasonable .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-23-2006
Reported in : 2006(4)CTC483
..... of tamil nadu : air2000sc3060 as a one-time measure. by the tamil nadu town and country planning (amendment) ordinance 7 of 2000 (tamil nadu act 31 of 2000), section 113-a was further amended, whereby all buildings constructed on or before 31st august 2000 were made eligible to be considered for such regularisation on payment of ..... for the commercial zones, further restrictions are imposed in relation to the horsepower rating of electric motors and provisions have also been made to regulate storage of explosives as well as to regulate effluents, smoke, gas or other items which are likely to cause danger or nuisance to public health. the development control rules ..... petition was pending in supreme court, the state of tamil nadu amended the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971 by the amending act, 1998 (tamil nadu act 58 of 1998) by inserting section 113-a to the act, which reads as follows:113-a. exemption in respect of development of certain lands or buildings.--(1) notwithstanding .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-25-2006
Reported in : (2007)8VST252(AP)
..... by the tribunal. the revision is filed accordingly.4. before the revision is considered, it would be appropriate to have a look at section 22 of the sales tax act. section 22 of the act prescribes that a dealer or the authority prescribed may prefer a revision against the order on the ground that the appellate tribunal either decided the ..... substantiated.5. the petitioner has, however, relied on a judgment of the supreme court reported in deputy commissioner of agricultural income-tax and sales tax, ernakulam v. indian explosives ltd. [1985] 60 stc 310. the facts in this case were altogether different. the supreme court noted:it was not disputed that goods were imported by the respondent ..... to various members of association had to be decided after the import.7. going by the judgment of the supreme court and also the mandate of section 22 of the sales tax act, we are of the view that no substantial questions of law are involved in these revisions. we are also of the view that the tribunal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-29-2006
Reported in : (2006)4MLJ906
..... booking stations on application to the station masters or goods clerks. the forms of forwarding notes specified by the central government in accordance with section 64 of the railways act, 1989 are shown in annexure 'a'.3. merchants and traders must satisfy themselves that their packages are properly addressed and their forwarding notes ..... note, which must be signed by the sender or his authorised agent, and must contain a declaration of the weight, description in accordance with section 66 of the railways act, 1989 and destination (station and railway on which situated) of the goods consigned, and indicate in the column provided for this purpose, the ..... rules, 1990;iv. articles not packed in accordance with the prescribed conditions or articles in a defective condition;v. explosives and other dangerous goods. 12. having dealt with the relevant provisions in the railways act and railways commercial manual, let me now proceed to discuss the points for consideration which have emerged in this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Aug-31-2006
Reported in : 2007CriLJ1059; [2007(2)JCR13(Jhr)]
..... , each, for the said offence. these sentences were ordered to run concurrently.3. the appellant, pran yadav, was charged for the offence under section 307 ipc and section 3/4 of explosive substance act for unlawfully and maliciously causing explosion by explosive substance likely to endanger the life or property and attempting to commit murder of jagdish yadav on 21st november, 2001. in village turshadih within ..... imprisonment for seven years. the said appellant, pran yadav, was further convicted for the offence under section 3/4 of explosive substance act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years under section 3 of explosive substance act. however, no separate sentence was passed under section 4 of the explosive substance act. both sentences were ordered to run concurrently. other appellant nos. 2 to 7 were convicted for .....
Tag this Judgment!