Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: mumbai Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 612 results (0.056 seconds)

Adnan Bilal Mulla Vs. the State Through D.C.B., C.i.D.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006BomCR(Cri)581

..... includes section 120-b, 121-a and 122 of ipc, as also sections 3, 4, 5 and 20 of pota. section 121-a ipc reads as follows;-section 121-a. whoever, within or without india conspires to commit any ..... conspiracy for waging war against the government, we have referred to sections applied in the charge-sheet, the details of which are furnished in the written submission exhibit a, under the head 'iv-sections apply'. the list indicates application of various provisions of prevention of damage of public property act, 1984, explosives substances act, explosives act and various provisions of indian penal code and pota. the list .....

Shri Vishan Shamlal Milwani and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)(109)ECC113

..... the goods. they did not have the capacity to manufacture the entire goods stated to have been clandestinely removed that their manufacture of fireworks is governed under the explosive act and so the production cannot be concealed and that they cannot work during night as electricity is not used in the premises as the heat generated by electricity can ..... possible for them to remove calendestinely finished goods valued at rs. 1.36 crores from the factory premises.10. as regards penalty it was submitted that penalty under section 11ac is not mandatory as has been held in a number of decisions and since no clandestine clearances have been effected the penalty is not imposable at all.11 ..... as in case of clandestine removal all facts cannot be similar and each case has to be judged on its own merits.15. as regards the mandatory penalty under section 11ac, we hold that the penalty is the maximum penalty provided and not equivalent penalty and we are inclined to reduce this penalty to rs. 5 lakhs only .....

Arti Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... the consignment does not contain any type of arms, ammunition, cartridges, shells, mines, radio active contaminated or any other explosive material. in the absence of such certificate the consignment was seized and confiscated under provisions of section 111(d) of the customs act, 1962 with an option to redeem the same on payment of fine of rs. 1,75,000/-. a penalty of .....

Amitabh Bachchan Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... machinery ltd. (supra)), the question was allowallibility of expenditure on technical know-how for five years. at page 688, the hon'ble delhi high court held that section 37(1) of the act requires that the expenditure should not be of a capital nature. the court held, the question whether a particular expenditure is revenue, incurred for the purpose of business ..... and spread over a period of sixteen years.31. the learned dr further relied upon the decision of the hon'ble calcutta high court in the case of indian explosives ltd v. cit wherein expenditure for constructing a building on land taken or licence for a period of ten years with an option for renewal for another ten years, ..... , shri y.p. trivedi and shri v.h. patil. according to them, this is to be treated as revenue expenditure and claimed to be allowable under section 37(l) of the act.8. assessing officer rejected assessec's claim on the basis of the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of empire jute co.ltd. v .....

Kesari Steels Ltd., Kotdwar Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)(113)ECC327

..... material is found in the consignment. this is not in dispute. the commissioner of customs found that the goods are liable for confiscation under section 111(d) of customs act, 1962 on the ground that the appellants have not produced pre-shipment certificate. therefore, the commissioner of customs, kandla in all the cases ..... and the exporter stipulating that the consignment does not contain any type of arms, ammunition, mines, shells, cartridges, radio active contaminated, or any other explosive material in any form either used or otherwise.4. in the present cases, importer did not furnish sale contract document, but however furnished pre-shipment certificate ..... 28 to the effect that: a) the consignment does not contain any type of arms, ammunition, mines, shells, cartridges, radio active contaminated or any other explosive material in any form either used or otherwise. waste/scrap/seconds/defective as per the internationally accepted parameters for such a classification. c) copy of the .....

Nandkishore S/O Mohan Lal Lahoti Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR103; 2006(6)MhLj552

..... power which has been delegated to the district magistrate cannot be exercised by the additional district magistrate. because the powers of granting consent under section 7 of the explosive substances act, 1908 have been delegated by the central government to the district magistrate.thus, the ratio in the above referred cases is clear that ..... collector. there was no prohibition on the commission to delegate the powers of hearing to the deputy collectors as is permissible under sub-section (2) of section 10a of the act, but the commission delegated these powers to the collectors. the collectors of districts aurangabad and parbhani in the present two matters further delegated ..... petitions on the ground that the state election commissioner did not delegate his powers to the sub divisional officers as authorized under sub-section (2) of section 10a of the act. the action of sub-divisional officers is tried to be justified on behalf of the respondents stating that the election commissioner himself .....

A.S. Shirsat Vs. State of Maharashtra and 12 ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR273; 2007CriLJ548

..... to the additional chief secretary, home department, bombay in a sensitive case involving a notorious gangster and pertaining to the illegal smuggling and concealment of arms and explosives. the joint commissioner of police proposed his name keeping in view the experience of the respondent no. 3 in such important matters as a prosecutor and forwarded shri ..... public prosecutors. rules 21 and 22 thereof read thus:' 21. appointment of special public prosecutor -(1) the remembrancer of legal affairs shall appoint under sub-section (8) of section 24 of the code of criminal procedure, any person, who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than ten years, as a special ..... nikam's consent to act as prosecutor in the said matter. the proposal for appointment of the respondent no. 3 as special public prosecutor was processed by various authorities of the state .....

Javed @ Java Ahmed Mohammed Akbar Bhatt and ors. Vs. the State of Maha ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1386

..... been committed by the accused. according to the well known commentary on the indian penal code by ratanlal & dhirajlal the ingredients required to be proved for an act to constitute an offence under section 122 are: (i) there must be a collection of men, arms or ammunition; (ii) such a collection should be with the intention of either ..... often said that the number of force, the manner in which they are arrayed, armed or equipped is immaterial. even a limited number of persons who carry powerful explosives and missiles without regard to their own safety can cause more devastating damage than a large group of persons armed with ordinary weapons or firearms. then, the other settled ..... and design to wage war against the established government exists or the offence falls short of it.for instance, the firepower or the devastating potential of the arms and explosives that may be carried by a group of persons - may be large or small, as in the present case, and the scale of violence that follows may .....

Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)101TTJ(Mum.)349

..... which right to trade on the floor of the stock exchange is acquired by the assessee. since it is an intangible asset within the definition of section 32 of the it act, the assessee is entitled for depreciation thereon. we, therefore, find no merit in the disallowance made by the revenue authorities. accordingly, we set aside ..... right to trade on the floor of the stock exchange through bse card, it is an intangible asset and the assessee is entitled for depreciation under section 32 of the it act. the learned counsel for the assessee, however, invited our attention to the following orders of the tribunal and the judgment of different high courts ..... bse) card owned by the assessee.2. during the course of the hearing, the learned counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the provisions of section 32 of the it act, with the submission that the depreciation is allowable on know-how, patent, copy rights, trademarks, license, franchise or any other business or commercial rights of .....

Aasu Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... like indentor's/trader's commission which generally in the textile trade is... which are relevant in determining the assessable value of the imported goods under section 14 of the customs act, 1962. keeping all these factors in mind it has been decided that in case the difference between the values indicated in the s.o. and ..... in the following paras may be taken into account by all commissioners of this zone while determining the correct assessable value of the said items under section 14 of the customs act, 1962. 2. for the last para of the standing order reading as the above practice of valuation of above items must be adopted by all ..... and allow the appeals.office of the chief commissioner of customs, new custom house, ballard estate mumbai- 400 001.sub.:- valuation of certain standard goods of section xi of customs tariff act - instructions regarding.it has been noticed that polyester chips, poy, pfy, psf, acrylic fibre, viscose staple fibre and silk are being assessed at varying rates .....