Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 5,322 results (0.116 seconds)

State of Gujarat Vs. Jaman Haji Mamad Jat and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1584; (2007)2GLR1165

..... (d), 25(1)(aa), 25(1)(b)(c)(f) of arms act, sections 4(b), 5 and 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908, section 3 of criminal law amendment act, sections 3 and 6 of indian passport rules (entry into india), section 13(2) of foreigners act amended section 14 and section 6(1-a) of indian wireless and telegraphic act.2. the accused nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 were ..... )(b)(c)(f) of arms act, sections 4(b), 5 and 6 of explosive substances act, 1908, section 3 of criminal law amendment act, sections 3 and 6 of indian passport rules (entry into india), section 13(2) of foreigners act amended section 14 and section 6(1-a) of indian wireless and telegraphic act. however, they were acquitted for the offence under section 489(a) read with section 34 of the indian penal .....

Rukhsar Ahmad Wani Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(1)JKJ382

..... petitioner says that the detention order suffers from non-application of mind of the detaining authority besides being unwarranted and unconstitutional as it offends section 13 of public safety act and article 22(5) of constitution of india. learned counsel submits that there was no material worth the name justifying detention of the ..... and to spread scare and alarm among the general public with the plan to cause killings, destruction of property by causing explosions and by using lethal/fire arm weapons. whereas, you were acting as a courier and harbour of militants at your residence at udhampur for the last three years and has also ..... the source or material, unless, however, the detaining authority exercises his power to dispense with the requirement of disclosing grounds of detention under section 13(2) of the public safety act, in public interest, renders the detention unconstitutional for it deprives the detenue his light of making an effective representation against his detention.8. .....

Sanjay Sonkar Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007CriLJ954

..... each and to pay a fine of rs. 1000/- each in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months each for the offences under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act.2. sanjay sonkar preferred criminal appeal no. 5 of 2005 challenging his order of conviction and sentence and at the time of hearing of ..... collected by pratul chandra sarkar and himself, he submitted charge sheet against both sanjay sonkar @ drum and mahabir singh under section 302/34 of the ipc and also under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act.6. the learned trial judge, after framing charges against both the appellants, called upon the prosecution to examine its witnesses ..... consideration would be whether the learned additional sessions judge was legally and factually justified in convicting both the appellants under section 302/34 of the ipc and also under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act for the death of sew sankar misra.24. we find from the judgment impugned in these appeals that the .....

Aloke Nath Dutta and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(13)SCALE467; (2007)1Crimes321; 2007(1)KCCRSN23(SC); (2007)12SCC230

..... mamata dutta are concerned, the only evidence against them was the judicial confession of mrinal dutta. the same was admissible against them only under section 30 of the indian evidence act.section 30:69. it is not in dispute that apart from general evidence in regard to commission of forgery etc., only evidence of involvement ..... of the high court to award death penalty, observed:the very idea of attacking and overpowering a sovereign democratic institution by using powerful arms and explosives and imperiling the safety of a multitude of peoples' representatives, constitutional functionaries and officials of government of india and engaging into a combat with security forces ..... admissibility in evidence. if the confession appears to the court to have been caused by any inducement, threat or promise such as is mentioned in section 24, evidence act, it must be excluded and rejected brevi manu. in such a case, the question of proceeding further to apply the second test does not arise .....

The Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Standard Fireworks Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)211CTR(Mad)99

..... valuation date is 31.03.2001. no wealth-tax return was filed by the assessee under section 16(1) of the wealth-tax act ('act' in short). the revenue had information to the effect that the assessee having taxable wealth. hence, notice under section 17 was issued to the assessee calling for the wealth-tax return. in response to the notice ..... the revenue submitted that the authorities below failed to note that, in the land at velachery, chennai, there were three magazines (fireworks godown) and when the assessee surrendered explosive licence in respect of one magazine and renewed only in respect of two magazines, the c.w.t.(a) ought to have held that the magazine in respect of ..... . as per the agreement dated 25.05.2001, the purchaser is entitled to enter the land only after the agreement date. further, the assessee has renewed its two explosive licences upto 31.03.2002. merely because one licence was surrendered, that too, after the end of the valuation date, it could not be held that the land .....

Javed @ Java Ahmed Mohammed Akbar Bhatt and ors. Vs. the State of Maha ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1386

..... been committed by the accused. according to the well known commentary on the indian penal code by ratanlal & dhirajlal the ingredients required to be proved for an act to constitute an offence under section 122 are: (i) there must be a collection of men, arms or ammunition; (ii) such a collection should be with the intention of either ..... often said that the number of force, the manner in which they are arrayed, armed or equipped is immaterial. even a limited number of persons who carry powerful explosives and missiles without regard to their own safety can cause more devastating damage than a large group of persons armed with ordinary weapons or firearms. then, the other settled ..... and design to wage war against the established government exists or the offence falls short of it.for instance, the firepower or the devastating potential of the arms and explosives that may be carried by a group of persons - may be large or small, as in the present case, and the scale of violence that follows may .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Subash and Company

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... or damage to the case property by fire or accident and further the accident had taken place due to negligence of insured or criminal act of servant and further the vehicle is damaged due to fire or explosion or accident. since, the accident had taken place due to negligence of crane driver and not the truck tanker driver, so, ..... against the back side of the tanker and, thus, caused the accident and petrol started leaking from the tanker and spread over the road. upon his statement case under section 279, 337, ipc bearing no. 18/97 was registered by the police. thus, according to the version contained in ex. c-2, accident had been caused by the ..... the said vehicle provided that fire or accident has arisen on account of negligence of the insured or negligence or criminal act of his servants and further provided that the vehicle is damaged by such fire or explosion or accident, and a claim in respect thereof is admitted under the motor comprehensive insurance policy covering the vehicle. the .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kashmiri and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(2007)ACC559; 2008ACJ138; (2007)146PLR550

..... other motor vehicle the tanker had fallen on one of its sides on slopping ground resulting in escape of highly inflammable petrol and that there was grave risk of explosion and fire from the petrol coming out of the tanker. in the light of the aforesaid circumstances the learned judges of the high court have rightly concluded that the ..... due to motor vehicle accident. the hon'ble supreme court in para nos. 3 6 & 37 of the said judgment has held as under:36. was the accident involving explosion and fire in the petrol tanker connected with the use of tanker as a motor vehicle? in our view, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, this ..... bakhtwar. it was further claimed that in order to occupy the truck, his murder was committed by poisoning him. on these allegations the claim petition was filed under section 163-a of the act claiming total compensation of rs.ten lacs along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of accident till its realisation. it was claimed that the deceased .....

Chemfab Alkalis Limited, Rep. by Its Company Secretary Mr. S. Ramanuja ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)1MLJ338

..... petroleum products in tanks in connection with pump outfit for fuelling motor conveyances in form xiv of the petroleum rules, 2002, is granted by the petroleum and explosives safety organisation for which a 'no objection certificate' from the district authority is required under rule 144 of the petroleum rules, 2002. having received the 'no ..... of 5 metres within the boundary of the premises as prescribed by the rules, 2002. the safety distance is only 3 metres as per schedule iv, sub-section (c) of the petroleum rules, 2002. 16. the vent pipes of the underground tanks installed in the premises have observed 4 metres safety distance in ..... further stated that the petitioner's factory, being a 'hazardous establishment', is functioning under various licences of the state government of pondicherry covered under the various acts & rules. the said factory is adopting all precautionary measures as per the directions of the state government of pondicherry and the officials of the state government .....

R.D. Bohet S/O Sh. Bhoop Singh, Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi, Govt. of Nc ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... many of whom are under trials with previous convictions, convicts involved in murder rape and other heinous offences convicts involved in offences under the arms act and explosive act as also the ndps act and further tada and pota under trials, dangerous prisoners like those involved in the attack on parliament on 13th december 2001 and other death sentence ..... though the ccs (cca) rules, 1965 have not taken enough provisions and stringent measures to call for the presence yet under the commission of inquiries act, 1952, section 4 provides as a power of commission to summon and enforce the attendance of any person from any part of india to depose on oath, failing ..... authority has given detailed and cogent reasons for arriving at a decision in this regard. the order is based on violation of the provisions of section 9 of the delhi prisons act, 2000 that provides that the officers (of the jail) shall not have business dealings with the prisoners. the disciplinary authority has clarified that .....