Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 2 of about 5,300 results (0.105 seconds)

Feb 03 2006 (TRI)

Keltch Energies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

..... which were within time period, impugned order holding that no need to resort to provisional assessment as revenue also claimed higher duty when price increased, upheld - section 11b of central excise act, 1944 (para 4).as rightly contended by the learned advocate the facts of mrf case relied on by the commissioner (a) are distinguishable. hence, following ..... considered as reduction in price which the commissioner. (b) jaiswal equipments and holdings pvt ltd. v. cce, raipur 2005 (185) e.l.t. 306.cce, nagpur v. orient explosives pvt. ltd. and ors. - vide final order no. a/1085-1088/wzb/2005.utkal polyweave indus. pvt. ltd. v. cce, bhubaneswar 2001 (136) e.l.t. 818 ..... appeal against order-in-appeal no. 684/2001-c.e., dated 15-11-2002 passed by the commissioner of central excise (appeals), bangalore.2. the appellants manufacture explosives, an excisable commodity. they supply the product to m/s. coal india ltd. and other public sector undertakings. the prices are fixed on the basis of tender and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2006 (FN)

Pirelli Cable Holding NV and Others (Respondents) Vs. Her Majesty's Co ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Feb-08-2006

..... is important to have in mind how they come to arise at all. they arise from the explosive effect of community law on a prime feature of the legislation regarding groups of companies. on its face section 247 precluded non-resident parent companies from making a group income election. the netherlands convention was drafted ..... and the uk and italy did. the agreements themselves did not ipso facto become enforceable in our domestic law but section 788 of the 1988 act gave them that enforceability. sub-section (1) of section 788 declared that "if her majesty by order in council declares that arrangements specified in the order have been made ..... tax. what was unlawful was interfering with the pirelli parent companies' article 52 freedom of establishment by denying their subsidiaries a facility (the ability to avoid act by making a group income election) available to uk-resident parent companies' subsidiaries. the charge which was found proved was discrimination against other member state parent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2006 (SC)

Duncan Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC3699; 2006(2)AWC1162(SC); 2006(1)JKJ42[SC]; JT2006(2)SC294; 2006(2)SCALE284; (2006)3SCC129

..... behalf of' each of the manufacturers and enclosed a draft of the undertaking to be signed. finally, the letter stated:.your (m/s indian explosives ltd.) willingness to participate in the retention price scheme communicated, and undertaking the enclosed form duly executed by a competent authority on behalf of ..... appellant') is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling urea (a fertilizer). in 1993, the first appellant acquired the urea plant of m/'s indian explosives ltd. (a unit of ici india ltd.). the second appellant is a shareholder in the first appellant-company (hereinafter, collectively 'the appellants').4. in 1957 ..... notified fertilizers (including urea) as an 'essential commodity', under the essential commodities act, 1955 (hereinafter 'the ec act'). the fertilizer (control) order, 1957 (hereinafter 'the fertilizer (control) order') was made in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the ec act. the fertilizer (control) order has been revised from time to time. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2006 (TRI)

Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. (Appeals)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Feb-15-2006

Reported in : (2006)(108)ECC128

..... ) is also not correct in rejecting the appeal holding that the communication of the dy. commissioner is not an appealable order. as held in the case of indian explosive limited (supra), communication of the dy. commissioner has to be treated as a decision or an order passed by the adjudicating, authority and the same is appeable. the ..... order by the dy.commissioner and hence, the appeal filed before the commissioner is entertainable. the learned counsel further submits that the tribunal in the case of indian explosives limited reported in 1991 (56) e.l.t. 583 in an identical situation has considered conveying a decision against a letter to be a decision or order ..... passed by the adjudicating authority and to be appeable under section 35 of the central excise act. the learned counsel submits that the matter has to go back to the original authority with a direction to take their letter dated 9-1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2006 (HC)

A.C. Pavithran and Etc. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-15-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2702

..... 3 from the witness box is totally different from that of the prosecution version. even though the accused were initially charged for offences punishable under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive sub-stances act, 1908 also, when the final report was filed those offences were deleted. none of the persons who have witnessed the occurrence has been ..... sitting in the veranda of the shop of p. v. kumaran and engaged in a conversation. when he was about to reach the jeep stand he heard an explosion from the jeep stand and a jeep suddenly starting and proceeding towards thuvakkunnu. he also saw tharassiyal suni, tharassiyal pradeepan, kacheri suni, echilat chalil manu, kuniyal thankan, ..... and 537 of the code of criminal procedure 1898, which correspond respectively to sections 464 and 465 of the code, and held that in judging a question of prejudice, as of guilt, courts must act with broad vision and look to the substance and not to technicalities, and their main concern should be to see whether the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2006 (HC)

Federation of Gujarat Petroleum Dealers Association and 2 ors. Vs. Sta ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-20-2006

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1432

ORDER IN SCA Nos. 8117 of 2005 & 8118 of 2005.33. Though all the three matters are heard together, as far as main judgment is concerned, I have considered the facts of Special Civil Application No. 8116 of 2005 and I have given detailed reasons and disposed of the said matter. The other two matters i.e. Special Civil Application Nos. 8117 & 8118 of 2005 are also identical and raising same challenge. In view of the reasonings and conclusion in the main judgment, these two petitions i.e. Special Civil Application No. 8117 of 2005 and 8118 of 2005 are also disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged to the aforesaid extent in both the petition with no order as to costs....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2006 (HC)

Coal India Ltd Vs. Indian Explosive Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-21-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)CHN433

..... in the said letter, the following are mentioned as the references :(1) cil tender no. cil/c2d/sec.ii/bulk loading explosives/2005-06/26 dtd. 11.01.2005 and opened on 12.02.2005.(2) offer no. bulk loading explosives/iel/ts/2005-06/02 dated 12.02.2005.(3) the letter dtd. 11.04.2005 and subsequent ..... informed by reason. in appropriate cases, action uniformed by reason may be questioned as arbitrary in proceedings under article 226 or article 32 of the constitution....the state acts in his executive power under article 298 of the constitution in entering or not entering in contracts with individual parties. article 14 of constitution would be applicable to ..... without a remedy, but writ petition is certainly not that remedy.27. for suggesting that the coal india could not have added the supplementary clause. sections 10, 13 and 14 of the contract act were relied upon by sri ray as also the three reported decisions, they being 0065/1965 : [1966]1scr656 , bhagwandas goverdhandas kedia v. girdharlal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2006 (HC)

Adnan Bilal Mulla Vs. the State Through D.C.B., C.i.D.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-2006

Reported in : 2006BomCR(Cri)581

..... includes section 120-b, 121-a and 122 of ipc, as also sections 3, 4, 5 and 20 of pota. section 121-a ipc reads as follows;-section 121-a. whoever, within or without india conspires to commit any ..... conspiracy for waging war against the government, we have referred to sections applied in the charge-sheet, the details of which are furnished in the written submission exhibit a, under the head 'iv-sections apply'. the list indicates application of various provisions of prevention of damage of public property act, 1984, explosives substances act, explosives act and various provisions of indian penal code and pota. the list .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2006 (FN)

Scheidler Vs. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-28-2006

..... 848 , 854 (2000) (holding that by using the term affecting commerce, congress did not define the crime described in [18 u. s. c.] 844(i) as the explosion of a building whose damage or destruction might affect interstate commerce, and noting that the court must look to other qualifying language in the provision to define the offense). for ..... second question requires an entry of judgment in petitioners favor, we shall not answer the first or third questions. ii we first set forth the hobbs act s text. the relevant statutory section imposes criminal liability on [w]hoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in ..... the reference in the physical violence clause to actions or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section seems to mean acts or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to engage in robbery or extortion , for that is the only kind of behavior that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2006 (HC)

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Its Secretary, Department ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2412; 2006(2)CTC285; (2006)3MLJ160

..... on 18-10-2004, a case was filed in crime no. 1221/2004 under section 154 of code of criminal procedure for offences under sections 307, 323 i.p.c., read with sections 25 and 27 of indian arms act and 4 (b) of explosive substance act against her husband and three others, the fifth respondent has not deliberately registered f.i ..... .r. under section 302 i.p.c. against the third respondent herein, subsequently who are ..... and in particular experienced in conducting post-mortem of dead bodies whose death were caused by fire arms/explosives.13. in the proceedings no. roc.58187/04/c1 dated 19-10-20 04, the collector has ordered an enquiry under section 150(3) of police standing order into the death of veerappan and his close associates. accordingly, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //