Correctly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: correctly Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.053 seconds)Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Vs. Solid and Correct Engine ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-08-2010
Reported in: 2010(175)LC8(SC),2010(3)LC1635(SC)
t s thakur j 1 these appeals under section 35l b of the central excise act 1944 arise out of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGanga Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-06-2010
r b misra j 1 in the present writ petition the petitioner has made mainly the following prayers i that...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSplendor Landbase Ltd. Vs Delhi Pollution Control Committee.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2010
1 whether reporters of the local news papers be allowed to see the judgment yes2 to be referred to the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Shrikrishna Jagannath Laskhare
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-2010
of the rules it is obligatory upon the department to correctly record the date of birth of an employee in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Gnanasekaran. Vs. the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome H ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-2010
value set out in the instrument has been set forth correctly 8 the provision does not provide for any time limit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNischintapur Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. Subrata Sen. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-05-2010
the court the short question involved in this appeal is whether the court of appeal can interfere with the decision...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChirayinkeezhu A. Babu Vs. Delimitation Commission
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-01-2010
Reported in: 2010(2)KLJ957
t r ramachandran nair j 1 the important question that is raised in this writ petition is with regard to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubrata Sen and anr. Vs. Nischintapur Tea Company Limited and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-11-2010
sanjib banerjee j 1 a piquant situation has arisen with the parties claiming that there was an obvious mistake in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. Mumbai. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-12-2010
..... the tribunal noted that the assessing officer had not examined the correctness of the claim of the assessee with reference to the ..... method arises if the assessing officer is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of the ..... on which interest was paid where the assessee has failed to correctly apportion the expenditure the assessing officer has to adopt the prescribed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJefferson Vs. Upton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-24-2010
570 f 3d 1283 1301 1309 ca11 2009 that court correctly stated the applicable framework under 2254 d pre aedpa questions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial