Correctly - Judgment Search Results
Hemend Dubey (Correct Name Is Hemendra Dubey) Vs. the State of Madhya ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2013
Criminal Revision No.535/2013 1.5.2013 Shri A. Usmani, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Akshay Namdeo, PL for the State. Heard finally....
Solid and Correct Engineering Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-24-2001
1. These seven applications relate to seven appeals arising out of a common order of the Commissioner. These Applications are...
Solid and Correct Engineering Works Vs. C.C. and C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-19-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC614Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These seven appeals arise out of the common order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-I. These are...
Department of Correctional Services and Another Vs. Police and Prisons ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: Mar-28-2013
On appeal from: the Labour Appeal Court, Cape Town (Murphy AJA, Waglay DJP and Davis JA sitting as court of...
Correctional Services Corp. Vs. Malesko
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-27-2001
S. 471 (1994), the Courts of Appeals had consistently and correctly held that corporate agents performing federal functions, like human agents
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Vs. Solid and Correct Engine ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-08-2010
Reported in: 2010(175)LC8(SC),2010(3)LC1635(SC)
T.S. Thakur, J.1. These appeals under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arise out of orders dated 19th...
Admitted It to Be Correct That on 13.6.2011 at the Time of Vs. Gurjant ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
CRM No.60289 of 2012 in/and CRM-A No.817-MA of 2012 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH...
“case Is Fixed for Filing Correct Address of the Vs. Ranjit Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
CRM not M-9144 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (259) CRM not...
it Is Correct That out of 700 Workers Working in Our Plot 150 Workers ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
Civil Writ Petition No.7345 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition...
“Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal Is correct in placing reliance upon th ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:01. 05.2013 CEA No.48 of 2012 M/s Oscar...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »