Correctly - Judgment Search Results

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)18ITD64(Mum.)

..... completely ignore the niceties and difficulties involved in an attempt at accurate allocation but rest correctly and solely on adopting the same method of valuation for the opening and the closing ..... stock adopted by the assessee is consistently followed and results in ascertainment of true and correct profit 10 inviting our attention to the fact that the departmental authorities have rejected the .....

Bowen Vs. American Hosp. Ass'n

Court: US Supreme Court

abandoned that view thus the preamble to the final rules correctly states that when a non treatment decision no matter how

Sri Mahalakshmi Finance Corpn. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1986)19ITD494(Hyd.)

1 this is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the commissioner under section 263 of the income...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hiralal Shankarlal

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1987]165ITR124(Cal)

satish chandra c j 1 at the instance of the revenue the income tax appellate tribunal has submitted this statement...

Darden Vs. Wainwright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... murphy followed closely the day long questioning of other jurors but if that assumption were correct then the court should also assume that murphy anticipated being asked whether his beliefs would ..... habeas relief on the basis of his claim of prosecutorial misconduct magistrate paul game jr correctly recognized that this case essentially turned on the relative credibility of three witnesses mrs turman .....

Ford Vs. Wainwright

Court: US Supreme Court

from the prosecutorial arm of government and as justice marshall correctly notes the governor is t he commander of the state

Omrao Industrial Corpn. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in: (1987)20ITD739(All.)

..... different high courts to stress that the penalty on the facts of the case was correctly levied the assessee concerned submitted a written explanation which was considered by the commissioner appeals ..... assessee did not offer any explanation whatsoever in respect of various discrepancies the ito has correctly imposed the penalty relying on the decisions as in addl cit v swatantra confectionery works .....

Ram Autar Shastri Vs. Khurshid Alam Khan and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1987All279

orderb d agrawal j 1 election in the lok sabha constituency no 68 farrukhabad took place as part of the...

Hukam Singh Inder Mohan Singh Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1986)18ITD1a(Delhi)

the first ground of appeal in the assessee s appeal in respect of this year is regarding its status according...

Janta Traders Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(13)LC685Tri(Delhi)

1 m s janta traders 59 67 mirza street bombay 400 003 have filed an appeal being aggrieved from order...