Correctly - Judgment Search Results

Sullivan Vs. Everhart

Court: US Supreme Court

sullivan v everhart 494 u s 83 1990 u s supreme court sullivan v everhart 494 u s 83 1990...

Soni Chemicals Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1991)(31)ECC451

1 the issue for decision in this case is whether correcting fluid and diluter packed in separate bottles and then...

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Bright Brothers Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1991)LC270Tri(Delhi)

..... duty of the departmental officers to collect the amount under the correct heading but if by mistake or otherwise an incorrect heading ..... circumstances of this case this also means that the officers had correctly taken into account the amount already paid on a tentative ..... one of legality of the department s action the goods were correctly classifiable under item 15a 2 cet during the material period and .....

P. Mariappan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)427MLJ1

order1 this writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge in w p no 11270 of...

Shree Nath Vs. Executive Engineer, U.P. Electricity Board

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1991(62)FLR54]; (1995)IIILLJ718All; (1991)2UPLBEC1187

conceives of a situation where the date of birth was correctly recorded that may not be amenable to any change subsequently

M.S. Abuthagir and ors. Vs. Peer Mohammed and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1992)1MLJ172

appraisal of facts appearing in this case the trial court correctly held that the emigrant muslims came from rajapalayam and other

Smt. Radha Gajapathi Raju Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1991]190ITR144(Mad)

abdul hadi j 1 in these tax cases under section 256 1 of the income tax act 1961 hereinafter referred...

Deepak Mahajan Vs. the Director of Enforcement and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1991CriLJ1124

..... reasons for dealing with both the applications the usual practice and the correct practice of the magistrates is to firstly read the case diary ..... s case supra has noticed it but in my view not correctly appreciated it in paragraph 14 of nagendra prasad s case supra ..... december 29 1960 she gave a second statement ex 2 and corrected certain inaccuracies in her first statement on january 2 1961 she .....

Kiran Sharma Vs. Shardha Nand Sharma

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 44(1991)DLT90; I(1991)DMC402

be disputed however we feel that this has not been correctly applied in the the facts of the present case this

M/S. Hindustan Polymers Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1676; 1989(24)ECC380; 1989(43)ELT165(SC); JT1989(3)SC674; 1989(2)SCALE411; (1989)4SCC323; (1989)4SCC323a; [1989]3SCR974

by the buyers 12 this position in my opinion was correctly approached in the decision of the bombay high court in