Correctly - Judgment Search Results

Tennard Vs. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Co ...

Court: US Supreme Court

tennard v dretke director texas department of criminal justice correctional institutions division 02 10038 2004 tennard v dretke director texas...

Perala Kishan Rao (Correct Name Is Perala Kista Rao) Vs. Sripuram Bhad ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: III(2004)BC550

orderp s narayana j 1 heard sri bankatlal mandhani learned counsel representing the revision petitioner and sri sampath prabhakar reddy...

Rubab M. Kazerani Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)97TTJ(Mum.)698

full value of the consideration received by the assessee was correctly disclosed at rs 5 50 00 000 the assessee cannot

Tarlok Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner Co-operation and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)138PLR355

rajive bhalla j 1 the petitioner by way of the present writ petition seeks the issuance of a writ in...

The State Vs. C. Ronald and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2005)1CALLT296(HC)

the facts themselves he was sure that the facts were correctly recorded in the document we are unable to agree with

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201

constitution 135 we also hold that mahanadi coalfield was not correctly decided in asmuch as india cement ltd and orissa cement

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Divine Light Mission

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2005]278ITR659(Delhi)

b c patel c j 1 for the asst yr 1966 67 onwards these references appeals are before the court...

Gulzara Singh and ors. Vs. Devinder Singh and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)138PLR330

counsel for the appellant next contended that the decree was correctly drawn in this case according to the khasra numbers mentioned

Ms. Rubab M. Kazerani Vs. the Jt. Commissioner of I.T.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)91ITD429(Mum.)

full value of the consideration received by the assessee was correctly disclosed at rs 5 50 00 000 the assessee cannot

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Jyotsna Alankar Bhandar

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cuttack

Reported in: (2005)92TTJCtk443

..... the financial year 1971 72 which lead to the conclusion that reliability authenticity or correctness of such records were fully doubtful as per learned departmental representative as the ..... not satisfactory regarding excess gold found as belonging to the customers the ao has correctly invoked provisions of 69a while making the addition 30 learned departmental representative further submitted .....