Correctly - Judgment Search Results

indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217

..... disease unhygienic living conditions low caste and consequential isolation and in accordance with correct principle i e with reference to the continuing ill effects of historical discrimination ..... economic level shall be denied reservation amongst the aforementioned backward classes of citizens correctly identified to be qualified for reservation preference may be legitimately extended to the .....

Mrs. Sarojini Ramaswami Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC2219; JT1992(5)SC1; 1992(2)SCALE257; (1992)4SCC506; [1992]Supp1SCR108

murti marg new delhi the statement made by mr sibal correctly reflects my position sd v ramaswami21 7 199213 on production

Wright Vs. West

Court: US Supreme Court

determine whether the court of appeals for the fourth circuit correctly applied our decision in jackson v virginia 443 u s

Hotel Balaji and Others, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Oth ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC1048; JT1992(6)SC182; 1993(37)KarLJ204; 1992(2)SCALE924; 1993Supp(4)SCC536; [1992]Supp2SCR182; [1993]88STC98(SC)

9 of haryana act and section 13aa of bombay act correctly its reasoning cannot be brought in here to contend that

Jugal Kishore Prabhatilal Sharma and Others Vs. Vijayendra Prabhatilal ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC864; 1993(1)ARBLR488(SC); 1992(2)SCALE893; (1993)1SCC114; [1992]Supp2SCR118

s ranganathan j 1 all these applications can be disposed of by a common order they arise out of awards...

Laxama Reddy and ors. Vs. the State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1992(2)ALT169

property is 0 2124 standard holding and the same was correctly computed in the holding of her husband narasimha reddy who

Keeney Vs. Tamayo-reyes

Court: US Supreme Court

..... finding that respondent was properly served by his trial interpreter and that the interpreter correctly fully and accurately translated the communications between respondent and his attorney app 51 the ..... that state courts committed constitutional error advances comity by allowing a coordinate jurisdiction to correct its own errors in the first instance it reduces the inevitable friction that results .....

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operative Housing Society Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993(2)BomCR329

was the result of a mutual mistake and did not correctly reflect the terms found in agreement dated 26 10 1950

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court: US Supreme Court

is legally right by asking two questions 1 was roe correctly decided 2 has roe succeeded in producing a settled body

FranklIn Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

the sequence of events will occur but as the court correctly notes ante at 797 800 the president s role in