Correctly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: correctly Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.028 seconds)Solid and Correct Engineering Works Vs. C.C. and C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-19-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC614Tri(Mum.)bai
1 these seven appeals arise out of the common order passed by the commissioner of central excise ahmedabad i these...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Decided on: Sep-05-2002
Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(JP.)653
..... auditors the observation of the learned departmental representative are not correct in respect of various allegations as referred in the ..... remedy of appeal we accordingly hold that the appellant had correctly invoked the jurisdiction for seeking relief before us and ..... 145 while maintaining that the books of account maintained are correct and complete and the profit could alone be estimated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs, Chennai Vs. Pos Hyundai Steel Mfg.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jan-11-2002
Reported in: (2002)(81)ECC156
..... and bill of entry had only 51 packages which was the correct weight and number of packages therefore the department wanted only ..... 6 98 itself therefore both the authorities have rightly appreciated and correctly noted the facts and found the bill of entry to ..... since exchange rate gross weight bill of lading number were not correctly mentioned and as per the original manifest there were 56 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGouranga Lal Chatterjee and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: [2002]253ITR678(Cal)
orderasok kumar ganguly j 1 in this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the decision of the tender evaluation committee...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Punjab and anr. Vs. Megh Raj Garg
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-06-2002
Reported in: (2003)134PLR84
satish kumar mittal j 1 this regular second appeal has been filed by the state of punjab as well as...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPorter Vs. Nussle
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-26-2002
porter v nussle 534 u s 516 2002 october term 2001 syllabus porter et al v nussle certiorari to the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPunjab Communications Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Sep-12-2002
Reported in: (2003)84ITD505(Chd.)
issue we are of the view that commissioner appeals has correctly deleted the addition of rs 7 12 000 made by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Agarwal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2002
1 this is an appeal by assessee against the assessment order under section 158bc of the it act relating to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUtkal Steels Ltd., Utkal Alloys Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cuttack
Decided on: Mar-14-2002
Reported in: (2002)82ITD120Ctk
weight cross section at both ends has to be measured correctly along with length of each piece and then the correct
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoint Cit Vs. Pact Securities and Financial Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2002
Reported in: (2003)86ITD115(Hyd.)
..... the rejection of accounts when the assessing officer himself has observed that the accounts are correct and complete and in accordance with the guidelines of the institute of chartered accountants of ..... lease adjustment account though the assessing officer has explained the lease terminal adjustment account rather correctly at page 5 of his order according to the counsel for the assessee he erred .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial