Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: supreme court of india Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.587 seconds)Al Lsmail Haj Tour Vs. Union of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-08-2016
and profit and loss account duly audited by the statutory auditors tax audit report and income tax return itr for financial as the statement relied upon by the learned additional solicitor general is not an exhaustive statement of law on the subject responsibility to the pilgrims the government of india has ample power under the approved policy to deregister such ptos this aspect 5 years but with the exception of the terms and conditions contained under clause vii x xi and xii of annexure ptos did not in the past really provide the necessary services which they ought to have provided to the pilgrims past on the subject when it is demonstrated that the administrative action of the government of india is inconsistent with the text
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoard of Control for Cricket Vs. Cricket Aasociation of Bihar and Ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-21-2016
bcci shall defray the costs charges and expenses of the auditors iii the president and secretary of bcci shall within two report of the committee filed by mr ratnakar shivaram shetty general manager admn game development bcci in the sequence of events council would amount to governmental interference and might invoke an action of suspension from icc i therefore requested him that he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGhanshyam Sarda Vs. Sashikant Jha, Director M/S Jk Jute Mills Co. Ltd. ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-18-2016
representatives in the asc 5 while the matter stood thus auditors report dated 15 02 2013 for the period ending 31 of the prevalent opinion from the office of the advocate general bihar that the registering authorities if not parties to the the court from doing justice in exercise of its inherent powers it held that the object of rule 2 a of the same position as they stood immediately prior to the service of the interim order 20 in sujit pal supra a civil court would be against the express intent of the act and would lead to incongruous and undesired results this court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Venkata Prasad and Ors. Vs. High Court of a.P. and Ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-29-2016
accommodation on the basis of communication made by the registrar general the government accorded sanction of 44 additional courts with specific under rule 5 2 they perform similar functions discharge identical duties and bear the same responsibilities as direct recruits they are to scope of interference in policy matters in exercise of power of judicial review and many other aspects came to hold the promotional avenues on ad hoc basis became available the conditions in brij mohanlal i supra and brij mohanlal ii supra ii within the cadre of the ap state higher judicial service with one more vacancy to arise on the retirement of the cadre of district and sessions judges category ii by transfer and posted some of them to regular posts in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAvtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-21-2016
any suppression 11 this court in r radhakrishnan v director general of police ors 2008 1 scc660considered a case where the service for lower posts which are not sensitive nature of duties impact of suppression on suitability has to be considered by due consideration of rules instructions if any in exercise of powers in order to cancel candidature or for terminating the services accepted the offer of appointment subject to the terms and conditions mentioned therein with his eyes wide open para 9 of was no occasion for them to produce such bogus certificates service cards for getting employed in railway service therefore it is passing order under section 17 b of the industrial disputes act 1947 will not survive in view of the present order offer of appointment issued to him om dated 1 7 1971 of the cabinet secretary department of personnel new delhi in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of Patiala Vs. General Secretary, Staff Union and Ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-30-2016
no 8181 of 2013 state bank of patiala appellant vs general secretary staff union ors respondents judgment anil r dave j keeper in 1984 in the course of performance of his duties he was asked to look after a godown maintained by case and considering the evidence the labour court exercised its powers under section 11a of the industrial disputes act 1947 and to the employer such a person cannot be continued in service and in our opinion the order of dismissal was just of its powers under section 11a of the industrial disputes act 1947 18 we are not referring the judgments which have
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of J and K Vs. Vichar Kranti International and Anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-21-2016
ps c s 11 05 dated 11 08 2005 granting general permission authority to the officials of the education department and permission in writing of the prescribed authority in exercise of powers conferred by section 16 2 b of the act the need for constituting a committee of experts to scrutinize the conditions in public government hospitals in the state the high court that the circular of 11 august 2005 also covered the services of medical doctors 4 section 13 of the jammu and their area and in case of failure to stop such activities the matter shall be brought to the notice of the 10 of the jammu and kashmir government employees conduct rules 1971 which prohibits a government servant from taking up any assignment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJorsingh Govind Vanjari Vs. Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Ro ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-06-2016
2002 on 06 09 2001 when he was performing his duties as a conductor on bus no mh 20 j 4714 date of superannuation the appellant would be entitled to all service benefits except back wages which were limited to 50 per was found less by rs 56 had the second party actually recovered the amount from the very six passengers then rs with first party as a bus conducted since 05 04 1971 at chopda depot thereafter he was transferred to amalner depot
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Shankar Mishra Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-15-2016
headquarters dated 28 december 1988 bearing no a 15010 150 ag ps 2 c emphasising the factors which have to be provides safeguards against an unfair and improper use of the power vested in the authority especially when even independent of the given to the long service hard stations and difficult living conditions that the or has been exposed to during his service days excluding 188 days non qualifying service the minimum qualifying service for earning pension under rule 132 of the pension regulations
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaju Devade Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-29-2016
called as the evidence act as an exception to the general rule contained in section 60 of the evidence act which stating that she was in a fit physical and mental condition to give the statement as per the injury report and where inconsistencies in the dying declarations in relation to the active role played by one or the other accused persons exist
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT