Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: allahabad Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.326 seconds)Ram Sewak and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-23-2010
the supreme court or of a high court or the comptroller and auditor general or the chief election commissioner if an court or of a high court or the comptroller and auditor general or the chief election commissioner if an allegation of heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned addl advocate general u p for the state 4 learned counsel for the or b he engages in any paid employment outside the duties of his office or c he is unfit to continue public service commissions articles 315 and 323 deals with various powers of the commission there is a specific provision which is eligible for these posts 12 in the act the service conditions were to be determined by the regulations but there was may be one half of the members of every public service commission indicates only an approximation and cannot be read as aforesaid prevention of corruption act 1947 was replaced by another act known as prevention of corruption act 1988 hereinafter referred as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.K. Pathak. Vs. Food Corporation of India and Others
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-05-2010
reducing the petitioner in rank from a m d to ag i d with future ban on promotion the petitioner filed officer 11 regulation 59 of the regulation 1971 deals with action on the inquiry report regulation 59 is quoted below 59 petitioner further submits that under regulation 59 of the regulation 1971 in the event the disciplinary authority disagrees with the finding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKali Ram Vs. Mistri Udal
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-28-2010
always permissible if the facts and situation so warrants the general instructions guidelines being advisory in nature do not confer any 18 at the very outset we are to observe that service rules under which the selection is going to take place as the commission 2 in all the three writ petitions action of the commission of not allowing the petitioners to appear
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Abhishek Singh and Others Vs. State of U. P. and Others.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-28-2010
of the commission and the facts as mentioned in the general instructions has to be treated accepted to be just advisory principles agreed to by the commission where there are no service rules 54 notes for preliminary weeding of candidates shall be as the commission 2 in all the three writ petitions action of the commission of not allowing the petitioners to appear
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Pushpa Devi W.O. Late Vishnu Kumar and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Thr ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-07-2010
from the voter list is arbitrary mala fide exercise of power done with oblique motive and purpose only to deprive the p panchayat raj act 1947 hereinafter referred to as the act which provides as under provided that no such correction deletion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCm Ajuman Madarsa Arabia Khairul Madaris and Others Vs. State of U.P. ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-04-2010
secretary has issued a list of 378 members of the general body on the basis of aforesaid list the last election of management and election then the assistant registrar has a power to decide the same it is clear that a cogent under section 25 1 of the u p societies registration act as amended in 1975 it was liable to be decided
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Bari and Another. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jul-02-2010
to the aforesaid appointment letters and continued to discharge their duties as nyay panchayat resource coordinator up till now thereafter government scc 588 sanjay singh and another v u p public service commission allahabad and another 2007 3 scc 720 ashoka smokeless and who may not involve in the corruption and other activities and the teachers who have worked for a period of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavi Gaur at Ravindra Kumar Gaur Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-28-2010
would defeat the ends of justice if any of these conditions exists a juvenile can not be released on bail while to bail under section 12 of the of the juvenile act as of right unless it is shown that his release
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh Chandra Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Nov-16-2010
age of 60 years in accordance with the terms and conditions applicable at the time of their retirement petitioners were sanctioned after attaining the age of 60 years he retired from service on 31 08 2005 similarly petitioner of writ petition no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrij Raj Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-08-2010
whatever he did he did in discharge of his official duties therefore the complaint was not maintainable for want of the to the alleged election the petitioner is alleged to have acted in discharge of his official duties while holding the election
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT