Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: delhi Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.131 seconds)Rajesh Kumar, Prop. Surya Trading Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, I. Tax
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-03-2005
Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Del)377; 117(2005)DLT559; [2005]275ITR641(Delhi)
incidental to the aforesaid audit including the remuneration of the auditors shall be determined by cit c iii new delhi and specified authority direct the assessedssto get accounts audited by an accountant defined in explanationn below section 288 2 of the act to the assessedssagain any arbitrary or unjust exercise of the power by the assessing officer it is not the case of signifies conjunction and not disjunction in other words the twin conditions of nature and complexity of the accounts and the interests accounts of the assesseds to be complex by having the services of a special auditor at hand special audit can also petitioners under the provisions of section 132 1 of the act various documents and books of account were seized the assessment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Dan Singh Bawa and ors. Vs. Ndmc and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-24-2005
Reported in : 2005(81)DRJ473
or denying the petitioners any facilities such as water or power for construction purposes or for any other purpose connected therewith compliance of certain conditions imposed by the committee since these conditions were not complied with by you the sanctioned plans were a double basement to meet the needs of both the services and car parking in order to consider the sanction of delhi municipal committee a body constituted under the punjab municipal act 1911 6 under the perpetual lease deed plot could be with the plans sanctioned by the ndmc on 23 7 1971 or denying the petitioners any facilities such as water or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Transport Corporation Vs. Jagdish Chander
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-03-2005
Reported in : 120(2005)DLT664; (2005)IIILLJ390Del
of reinstatement in law quando lex est specialist ratio autem generalise generaliteralex est intelligenda the industrial law is a special law the management the workman was irregular and irresponsible towards his duties the workman misbehaved with the passengers in the bus on protection to the workmen against any exploitation it also vests powers of wide discretion in the court so as to enable section 2 of section 33 deals with alteration in the conditions of service or the discharge or punishment by dismissal or its order dated 19 5 93 removed the workman from service on the same day one month s wages as contemplated of the employer under section 33 2 b of the act the workman is entitled to receive all benefits including full section 11 of the act by amending act 47 of 1971 the tribunal or the labour court thus was empowered to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Subhash Chand Vs. Govt. of Nct and anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-03-2005
Reported in : 117(2005)DLT527; 2005(82)DRJ346
denied or contained no reference to the labour court could generally be questioned on the ground of delay alone and a the statute book today does not materially affect the existing powers of the government to make a reference under section 10 government would have to apply its mind to certain basic conditions while considering the request of the persons covered under the dealing with industrial disputes in regard to non public utility services even when government is acting under section 12 5 so an administrative act and not a judicial or quasi judicial act 9 the scope and scheme of sections 10 and 12 act by section 3 of the industrial disputes amendment act 1971 with effect from 15th december 1971 the purpose of this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shri Sardar Singh
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-03-2005
Reported in : 118(2005)DLT63; 2005(80)DRJ611; [2005(105)FLR1124]; (2005)IILLJ430Del; 2006(1)SLJ222(Delhi)
by the presiding officer labour court in exercise of its power under section 10 of the act 6 there can be exception made is in case of sudden illness there also conditions are stipulated non observance of which renders the absence unauthorised is that the employee is deemed to have continued in service entitling him to all the benefits available this being the award of the labour court is set aside industrial disputes act 1947 section 10 1 c termination on the charge of act 1950 read with the delhi transport laws amendment act 1971 having perpetual succession and common seal the corporation is involved
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Rachna Kapila Vs. University of Delhi and anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-03-2005
Reported in : 117(2005)DLT460; 2005(80)DRJ300; 2006(1)SLJ184(Delhi)
will be expected to do teaching research work and other duties as may be assigned to you from time to time for a fixed period unless there is a finding that power under a particular clause has been misused or vitiated it in the scale of rs 2200 4000 the terms and conditions of her appointment will be same as contained in the the age of sixty years and is still in the service of the college or institution by virtue of the provisions d degree is enclosed for your kind information and necessary action 7 despite these events by memorandum the so called contractual
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSep. Jai Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-07-2005
Reported in : 119(2005)DLT66; 2005(2)ESC1355; 2006(1)SLJ256(Delhi)
7121355 js pen dated 18 4 1992 approached the controller general of defense accounts ccda r k puram new delhi as mechanical engineers eme he accepted combatantisation under the terms and conditions of service laid down in goi ministry of defense letter pension and could draw disability element only in addition to service gratuity under ai 184 69 the disability element was also where the individual has rendered sufficient service pension i e actual service is 15 years or more 20 years or more c 1 of 16 3 d ao dated 31 12 1971 with varied terms of engagement of 18 years of service
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Airlines Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-25-2005
Reported in : 2006(3)SLJ461(Delhi)
is a special act and the air act is a general act and thereforee the provisions of the standing orders act inter linked payment of wages is part of terms and conditions of service both of them are part of bread and payment of wages is part of terms and conditions of service both of them are part of bread and butter legislations as to become part and parcel of the standing orders act on its enactment or is it a case of legislation words from lord wilberforce s opinion in prenn v simmonds 1971 2 all er 237 in the same opinion lord wilberforce
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReunion Engg. Co. Limited Vs. National Building Construction Corporati ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2005
Reported in : 2005(1)ARBLR574(Delhi); 120(2005)DLT252; 2005(82)DRJ204
learned counsel for the respondents on supreme court in prabhat general agencies v union of india 1971 2scr564 and it is the contract relates and that in the course of his duties as such he had expressed views on all or any facilitate arbitration and to effectuate the awards cannot exercise appellate powers over the decision wrong or right the decision is binding the contract designs drawings specifications estimates instructions order or these conditions or otherwise concerning the works or execution or failure to the appointment is not made within fifteen clear days after service of the said notice the court may on the application act and not the scope of s 12 of the act under section 12 of the act the court to appoint supreme court in prabhat general agencies v union of india 1971 2scr564 and it is submitted that in view of law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Bharat Steel Tubes Pvt. Ltd.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-19-2005
Reported in : 121(2005)DLT65
a particular transfer from the life insurance fund to the general department was without consideration and the transfer was not reasonably is clearly proved before the court the court has ample power under sections 446 2 a b d and 468 read and has virtually abandoned the same in a most dilapidated condition prayer is also made in ca no 1168 2002 to conferred on small causes court under the bombay rent control act 1947 the owner of the premises would have to seek is important to be emphasised is that the act of 1971 is not a distinct code which has created its own
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT