Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 305 results (0.695 seconds)R.R. Delavai Vs. the Indian Overseas Bank and Others
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-19-1990
Reported in : AIR1991Mad61; [1994]81CompCas446(Mad)
..... constitution of india and the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 the said act will be referred to hereinafter as act 56 of 1971 arts 148 and 149 of ..... locus standi he invited my attention to the provisions of the comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 and the documents referred to in the affidavit filed in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmarjeet Kaur Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-21-1990
Reported in : 43(1991)DLT262
appointed by the central government on the advice of the comptroller and auditor general of india and the audited accounts are and the audited accounts are submitted to the comptroller and auditor general of india no additions or alterations to the articles the chairperson is to preside over the meetings of the general body and participate in the control and management of the an office implies the conception of tenure duration emoluments and duties and obligations fixed by law or some rule having the of the chairperson also flows from the fact that the powers and functions of the social welfare board are entwined with appointment to an office under the state is that the conditions of service such as tenure emoluments post retrial benefits etc appointment of the petitioner is merely a contract of personal service and no writ petition would lie for enforcement of such the state to account for its actions in its manifold activities by staling reasons for such action the bench has referred
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. V.S. Acharya Vs. Returning Officer and Deputy Commissioner
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-22-1990
Reported in : ILR1990KAR2546
that the performance of his functions was controlled by the comptroller and auditor general of india answered the question in the that the company for which he was appointed as an auditor was a government company within the meaning of the indian of the constitution section 8 h n nagamohan das j general rules of succession in case of males petitioners claim that their remuneration the council in exercise of its powers authorities duties and functions shall so far as is practicable be guided the administration of the institute and shall have all the powers necessary to carry out his functions subject to the overall instructions issued by the central and state governments rules regulating conditions of service of teaching and non teaching staff of the state government itself that the procedure laid down in civil services classification control and appeal rules as applicable to servants of a government company within the meaning of the indian companies act 1956 and 100 of the shares was held by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-24-1990
Reported in : 43(1991)DLT179
director finance in fcil and wrote certain letters to the comptroller auditor general his parent cadre who in turn took the his emoluments drawn by him immediately before absorption the comptroller auditor general on the same date forwarded that letter to the of 31st august 1982 annexure g the assistant comptroller auditor general personnel vide annexure h wrote to the petitioner that the adversely but which are necessary in the execution of their duties these acts may lend themselves to misconstruction and suspicion as india government of india on behalf of fcil has the power to appoint the top officers including the directors and to finance but it is a letter laying down terms and conditions of the appointment of the petitioner as director financed by case about retention of lien while he was in foreign service is ccl and such averment has not specifically been denied petitioner are void on the principle that fraud vitiates any action further the condition precedent under rule 37 of central civil
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSida Nitinkumar Laxmankumar Laxmanbhai and anr. Vs. Gujarat University ...
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : May-17-1990
Reported in : AIR1991Guj43; (1990)2GLR808
one or two we can t have heaven crammed see comptroller and auditor general of india v k s jagannathan 1986 two we can t have heaven crammed see comptroller and auditor general of india v k s jagannathan 1986 2scr17 16 is precluded from contesting the election if necessary for the general seat the supreme court observed that election recognizes no compartment as according to observation made by court as against this powerful and influential section of the society asserts in almost elitist of opportunity includes the right of the underprivileged to claim conditions comparable to or compensatory of those enjoyed by the privileged compared with another post and with the posts in other services of the government vi the selection of the seats posts 16 of constitution of india section 115 of indian evidence act 1872 and section 32 of gujarat university act 1949 educationally
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGude Lakshmi Basava Poornima Vs. State of A.P.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-27-1990
Reported in : 1991(1)ALT368
time so that rent controller can take necessary action for service of notice of deposit under sub rule 4 of rule prescribed while deposit of rent in terms of provisions of act and the rules amounts to valid tender of rent to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKumaraswamy Vs. Smt. Gangu Bai
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-06-1990
Reported in : 1991(1)ALT420
time so that rent controller can take necessary action for service of notice of deposit under sub rule 4 of rule however be no order as to costs all india services act 1951 sections 8 11 a p buildings lease rent and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunisami Naidu Vs. C. Ranganathan
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-30-1990
Reported in : AIR1991SC492; (1991)1MLJ42(SC); (1991)2SCC139
by the view of the union government there are also powers in the administrator to act in derogation of the advice and the language of section 44 of the union territories act 1963 on the other shows that the administrator is similarly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs Satwant Narang Vs. Appropriate Authority, I T Dept., New Delhi
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-14-1990
Reported in : (1991)92CTR(Del)163
when the statute does not give not give any such power to the court there is no worthwhile explanationn as to issue a no objection certificate under section 269ul of the act thereforee before acting upon the statement for transfer of property
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kilkotagiri Tea and Coffee Estates Co. ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-16-1990
Reported in : [1990]183ITR145(Ker)
2 of the second schedule to the companies profits surtax act 2 the short question that arises for consideration is whether appellate tribunal cochin bench for compliance contempt of courts act 1971 sections 20 2 b j b koshy a k basheer
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT