Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: supreme court of india Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.113 seconds)State of U.P. Vs. Ram Kanth Alias Rama Kant and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-08-2002
Reported in : JT2002(6)SC526
to provide canteen services to its employees even the profits generated from the urcs are not credited to the consolidated funds was justified sections 18 189 rules regulating to terms and conditions of service of civilian employees of air force unit run on the part of the central government to provide canteen services to its employees even the profits generated from the urcs and ramdhani arrived at the spot before however any further action they said to have discussed among themselves that since ram
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Bhagwan Roy and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-31-2002
Reported in : JT2002(6)SC523
to provide canteen services to its employees even the profits generated from the urcs are not credited to the consolidated funds evidence act sections 18 189 rules regulating to terms and conditions of service of civilian employees of air force unit run sections 18 189 rules regulating to terms and conditions of service of civilian employees of air force unit run canteen paid and 148 of indian penal code section 3 of evidence act sections 18 189 rules regulating to terms and conditions of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPradeep Kumar Biswas and ors. Vs. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-16-2002
Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1197; JT2002(4)SC146; 2002(3)SCALE638; (2002)5SCC111; [2002]3SCR100; (2002)2UPLBEC1798
csir are required to be audited by the controller and auditor general and placed before the table of both houses of industrial research anddevelopment and i any other activities to promote generally the objects of the resolution mentioned in a above 45 of mandamus was available for enforcement of statutory duties or duties of a public nature thus a statutory corporation with regulations notification dated 31 10 1986 issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section 2 of section 14 of the the csir cannot lay down or change the terms and conditions of service of its employees and any alteration in the it could operate effectively through natural persons constituting its civil service and they were found adequate to discharge governmental functions which as a legal principle that a societyregistered under the societies act or a company incorporated under the companies act is by minutely examined the provisions of the international airport authority act 1971 he found out the following features of ia i the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWest Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. C.E.S.C. Ltd. Etc. E ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-03-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC3588; [2003(1)JCR194(SC)]; JT2002(7)SC578; 2002(7)SCALE217; (2002)8SCC715
on the basis that the accounts audited by the statutory auditors should be accepted by the commission at its face value another company is managing with such low rates this sort general newspaper objection has no place in any court of law enactments involved in the procedure of tariff fixation and the duties and obligations of the commission and the high court under the commission shall without prejudice to the generality of its powers keep in view the principles enumerated in sub clauses a the commission to frame regulations providing for the terms and conditions for fixation of tariff in exercise of this latter power provide for the procedure for the filing of affidavits pleadings service of notice and the right of participation under regulation 32 of sections 44 3 and 76 2 of the 1948 act it held that since the award of the cea is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJhareswar Prasad Paul and anr. Vs. Tarak Nath Ganguly and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-08-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC2215; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)100; 2002(4)ALD64(SC); 2002(2)ALT(Cri)122; 2002CriLJ2935; 2002(2)Crimes430(SC); JT2002(Suppl1)SC290; 2002(4)SCALE546; (2002)5SCC352; [2002]3SC
of securing the feeling of confidence of the people in general for true and proper administration of justice in the country assistants that they were holding ex cadre posts that the duties and responsibilities discharged by the writ petitioners were not similar exercising contempt of court jurisdiction that it has exceeded its powers in granting substantive relief and issuing a direction regarding the issue directing the respondents and each one of them to act in accordance with law and to promote the lower division for the judiciary is undermined the contempt of courts act 1971 has been introduced under the statute for the purpose of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDirector of Settlements, Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. M.R. Apparao and ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-20-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC1598; 2002(6)BomCR367; JT2002(3)SC304; 2002(3)SCALE122; (2002)4SCC638; [2002]2SCR661
dealing with the eviction the court however observed that the general observations in those two decisions upon which reliance was placed may come within the expression for any other purpose the powers of the high courts under article 226 though are discretionary with certain restraints and within some parameters one of the conditions for exercising power under article 226 for issuance of a v state of u p 1997 3scr774 was pressed into service it was found out that in prem nath sharma s not have the subsisting legally enforceable right under the very act itself in the aforesaid circumstances we have no hesitation to settlement the aforesaid ordinance was replaced by act 3 of 1971 on 16 1 1971 amending sections 41 44 50 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChairman, State Bank of India and anr. Vs. All Orissa State Bank Offic ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-06-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC2279; [2002(94)FLR338]; JT2002(4)SC537; 2002LabIC2153; (2002)IILLJ562SC; (2002)3MLJ48(SC); 2002(4)SCALE423; (2002)5SCC669; [2002]3SCR797; 2002(3)SCT1127(SC); 2002(
association 7 the respondent no 1 association represented through its general secretary filed the writ petition raising grievance against unjust unfair different form its recognition recognition of a union confers rights duties and obligations non conferring of such rights duties and obligations the concept of recognized union and it being clothed with powers of sole bargaining agent with exclusive right to represent workmen the grievances of any individual member relating to his service conditions and to represent an individual member in domestic inquiry or any individual member of the petitioner association relating to his service conditions in a regulated prescribed manner and further to appear legislature and section 2a was introduced in the industrial disputes act 1947 by which it was made distinctly clear that the undertaking or industry other than recognized union section 22 of 1971 act confers some specific rights on such non recognised unions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Shah Goverdhan L. Kabra Teachers Col ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-23-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC3675; 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)384; [2003(1)JCR34(SC)]; JT2002(8)SC269; RLW2003(2)SC177; 2002(7)SCALE435; (2002)8SCC228; [2002]SUPP3SCR220; 2002(4)SCT885(SC); 2002(2)LC1506
and b shall be published in the official gazette for general information 3 once the recognition of a recognised institution is be applied not only in cases of conflict between the powers of two legislatures but in any case where the question section 17 to mean to be a provision dealing with conditions of service of an employee under the state government 10 parliament cannot make law prescribing qualification for entry into the service under the state government and such law can be made but it means to harmonics or secure relationship for concerted action a legislation made for the purpose of coordination of standards
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.T.C. Limited Vs. the Agricultural Produce Market Committee and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-24-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC852; 2002(1)ARBLR112(SC); [2002(2)JCR177(SC)]; JT2002(1)SC294; 2002(1)SCALE327; (2002)9SCC232; [2002]1SCR441; (2002)1UPLBEC814
act dealing with sale and purchase of sugar cane the general act namely the market committee act will have no application 29 of the state list which are as under 45 duties of excise on tobacco and othergoods manufactured or produced in 246 of the constitution deals with the distribution of legislative powers as between the union and the state legislature with reference tobacco in the places specified therein and on terms and conditions mentioned therein the moot question is whether the word industry fail to understand how this decision can be pressed into service for ascertaining the true import and content of the expression bench different state legislatures have enacted agricultural produce and markets act for regulating sale and purchase of the agricultural produce within learned additional solicitor general also contended the case of harakchand 1971 2 scc 779 is in consonance with the principle of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKaiser-i-hind Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. National Textile Corporation (Mah ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-25-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC3404; 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)314; 2002(6)ALT8(SC); JT2002(7)SC339; (2003)1MLJ129(SC); 2002(7)SCALE95; (2002)8SCC182; [2002]SUPP2SCR555
president to the state act having been obtained in a general way state act would prevail over the central act 100 to areas or acts outside the besides those formalities the powers actually exercised by the president at any rate under articles and if he is satisfied that judging by the local conditions a particular state should be permitted to make a provision can be got evicted by the prescribed summary procedure after service of notice to the occupier of the alleged unauthorized occupation is no specific mention of its repugnancy to the central act under consideration before us in the letter dated 15 12 from 20th june 1979 has made the public premises act 1971 wholly enforceable as held by the division bench judgment of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT