Skip to content


Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: karnataka Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.116 seconds)
Nov 13 2002 (HC)

The Management of Bata India Limited Vs. Workmen of Bata India Limited ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR269]; 2003(1)KarLJ488; (2003)IILLJ68Kant

establishment concerningwhich such reference has been made it may by general or special order make provision a for requiring the employer the workman employed therein depends ii any industry which supplies power light or water to the public iii any industry which to work or continue to work on such terms and conditions as may be specified in the order and c for declared by the state government to be a public utility service for the purpose of this act 2 an order made provisions of section 9 or 10 of karnataka general clauses act since 30th day falls on sunday presentation of dispute on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2002 (HC)

Gopichander M.L. Vs. Andhra Bank

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-2002

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ570Kant

memo the apex court in the case of deputy inspector general of police v k s swaminathanreported in 1997 iillj1011sc in bank which indicates that you have failed to discharge your duties with diligence devotion honesty and integrity thus you have committed of companies belonging to shri g radhakrishna beyond your discretionary powers without obtaining prior permission from the competent authorities the cheques character depending on the nature of the office and the conditions governing it if the act of relinquishment is of unilateral expiry of three months notice period as required under the service regulations of the bank by yet another letter dated december of the office and the conditions governing it if the act of relinquishment is of unilateral character it comes into effect

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 2002 (HC)

B. Suresh Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-27-2002

Reported in : ILR2003KAR1830; 2002(5)KarLJ202

hold civil posts of state not is i whether the duties which the employees of psc are required to perform are exercise on and from the appointed day all the jurisdiction powers and authority exercisable immediately before that day by all courts termination from service their liability for transfer and all other conditions of their services are as provided for under the rules service commission to conduct the examination for appointments to the services of the state and also to assist the state in of gazette notification issued under section 16 2 of the act produced at any stage will have to be accepted as

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2002 (HC)

S. Umapathy and anr. Vs. the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-21-2002

Reported in : ILR2002KAR2205; 2003(2)KarLJ472

and sell or transfer developed property owners of land executed power of attorney in favour of one of the partner the purely a discretion and not a part of the service conditions the authority relied upon by sri subba rao is not grant of an advance increment is not a condition of service it is only an incentive paid to the employees they rao learned senior counsel argued that if the respondents have acted erroneously and if the petitioners are not guilty of any 1999 the second petitioner joined the board on 29 2 1971 as junior assistant and subsequently he was promoted as assistant

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 2002 (HC)

M.S. Ganesh and ors. Vs. H.K. Subramanya and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-27-2002

Reported in : ILR2002KAR4123; 2003(5)KarLJ306; (2004)ILLJ246Kant

provided he possessed the qualification for appointment prescribed under the general recruitment rules that would mean that a person who was person who in its opinion is able to discharge the duties of such post on such terms and conditions as may were framed by the state government in purported exercise of powers under sections 3 and 8 of the karnataka state civil acts of the appropriate legislature may regulate the recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts appropriate legislature the state legislature enacted the karnataka state civil services act 1978 act for short to regulate the recruitment and are left at the midstream indeed it would be an act of cruelty at this stage to ask them to appear

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 2002 (HC)

Factory Manager, Rajashree Cements Vs. Naeem Pasha and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR285]; ILR2002KAR4817; 2003(1)KarLJ274; (2003)ILLJ781Kant

well recognized legal principle 24 a domestic tribunal is in general composed of layman and the powers exercised by an enquiry domestic tribunal is in general composed of layman and the powers exercised by an enquiry officer though may be stated as the workman indulged in the act of damaging the air conditioning by violent act was not proved in exercise of powers industrial disputes act ordered for reinstatement but denied continuity of service and back wages 8 aggrieved by the said award both strict and sophisticated rules of evidence under the indian evidence act may not apply all materials which are logically probative for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2002 (HC)

C. Doddappa Vs. Tungabadra GramIn Bank and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-15-2002

Reported in : II(2003)ACC43; 2003(1)KarLJ448

of this accident i must notice that the bank was generous in providing all the benefits available to the petitioner they occurs to an employee when he is performing bank s duties and the mishap is not attributable to any negligence on in character 8 petitioner s counsel referred to the service conditions of the canara bank in the matter of accident while retrospective in character 8 petitioner s counsel referred to the service conditions of the canara bank in the matter of accident leave on the facts of this case they justify their action in the matter 6 heard the learned counsels 7 counsels

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 2002 (HC)

Mrs. Leeladevi Rao Vs. K.U. Hari Rao

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-2002

Reported in : I(2003)DMC375; 2003(1)KarLJ379

brother had considerable influence with the authorities being the director general of police in bangalore two days after the marriage of f a no 3535 of 1995 and in exercise of powers under section 13a of the hindu marriage act 1955 pass mentally harassed and physically tortured her and that her health condition was such as would not allow her to cohabit with wife or resort to section 13a of the hindu marriage act 1955 to pass a decree for judicial separation instead section started his matrimonial life at rangoon he lived there till 1971 whereafter the family shifted to brunei and continued there up

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 2002 (HC)

M.G. Maheshwara Rao and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-18-2002

Reported in : ILR2002KAR3848; 2004(3)KarLJ187

was violative of rule 3 2 b of the kcs general recruitment rules 1977 which provides that notwithstanding anything contained in unfit for promotion on account of incapacity to discharge the duties attached the promotional post he need not be promoted therefore who is also the appointing authority in purported exercise of power under rule 3 of the kat conditions of service rules purported exercise of power under rule 3 of the kat conditions of service rules 1992 effected the following promotions on officiating possesses an equivalent qualification 2 must have put in a service of not lessthan three years in the cadre of junior file an application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act the following observations are relevant often in service matters the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 2002 (HC)

South India Corporation Limited Vs. the Karnataka Power Corporation Li ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-28-2002

Reported in : ILR2002KAR3038; 2003(2)KarLJ321

which no reasonable tribunal would have reached or abused its powers when the government is trading with the public the democratic intention of excluding applicants from zone of consideration or such conditions result in monopoly in favour of any person the argument against the common order dated 15 2 2002 nair coal services limited nagpur and anr v karnataka power corporation limited bangalore domestic airlines on consideration the supreme court held that the action of public sector undertaking was neither arbitrary nor illegal 18

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //