Skip to content


Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: supreme court of india Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.134 seconds)
Aug 28 2006 (SC)

B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC3106; JT2006(8)SC293; 2006(6)KarLJ457; 2006(8)SCALE710; (2006)11SCC731

relating to financial irregularities of the board and that the comptroller and auditor general submitted a report for the year ending financial irregularities of the board and that the comptroller and auditor general submitted a report for the year ending 31 3 been properly filled up would be thrown open to the general pool is wholly unfounded but the high court of delhi attaining superannuation as 31 01 2004 is relieved from his duties on the afternoon of 31 01 2004 10 he was in the field occupied by that subject matter the two powers and functions must be kept distinct and separate this dispute person to whom an offer of temporary employment under these conditions was made in the context of the note put up several negotiations with the petitioner union in regard to the service conditions of the employees of the 2nd respondent board since contractual appointment trade unions act 1926 chapter iii industrial dispute act section 2 q q karnataka urban water supply and drainage

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 2006 (SC)

Ajay Goswami Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Reported in : AIR2007SC493; 2007(2)ALD70(SC); 2006(14)SCALE317; (2007)1SCC143

ajay goswami relied on two judgments of this court in comptroller auditor general of india and anr v k s jagnathan goswami relied on two judgments of this court in comptroller auditor general of india and anr v k s jagnathan 1986 of various legislative norms regulations to protect the society in general and children in particular from obscene and prurient contents are so far as that role is concerned one of the duties of the media is to preserve and promote our cultural its observations implemented by the erring parties lack of punitive powers with press council has tied its hands in exercising control given facility to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity and that childhood and youth are required in the performance of our most basic responsibilities even service in the armed forces it is the very foundation of under section 1 3 of the act to bring the act into force keeping in view the facts brought on record

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2006 (SC)

S.S. Rana Vs. Registrar, Co-operative Societies and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2006

Reported in : JT2006(5)SC186; 2006(4)SCALE638; (2006)11SCC634; 2006(3)SLJ334(SC)

documents the registrar and subject to any restriction prescribed an auditor arbitrator or any person conducting supervision or inspection or audit by those entitled to inspect audit them i to convene general meetings j to convene the annual general meeting in due servant so deputed shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as may be prescribed xxx xxx xxx70 access to documents acting as a statutory authority in the purported exercise of powers conferred on him by the cooperative societies act the writ the bye laws framed under the act the terms and conditions of an officer of the co operative society indisputably are herein preferred an appeal against the said order terminating his services before the administrator on or about 2 12 1993 however if it is demonstrated that any mandatory provision of the act or the rules framed thereunder have been violated by it rules known as the himachal pradesh co operative societies rules 1971 some of which are relevant for the purpose of this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2006 (SC)

U.P. State Sugar Corpn. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sant Raj Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-12-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC2296; (2006)IIILLJ509SC; (2006)4MLJ618(SC); 2006(6)SCALE205; (2006)9SCC82; 2007(1)SLJ84(SC)

acquisition act 1971 to provide in the interest of the general public for the acquisition and transfer of certain sugar undertakings the respondents original petitioners have failed to establish that their duties responsibilities and functions are similar to those of the non the application selection s b sinha cyriac joseph jj criterion powers of the committee relaxation in selection of anganwadi workers held is terminated or until his remuneration or other terms and conditions of services or revised or altered by the corporation under not possessed of the qualification of degree in science his services were taken over in terms of the provisions of the were taken over in terms of the provisions of the act with effect from the date of nationalisation of the sugar in the said act was defined to be 3rd july 1971 in terms of section 3 of the said act on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2006 (SC)

V.C., Banaras Hindu University and ors. Vs. Shrikant

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-12-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC2304; 2006(4)ALD102(SC); 2006(6)SCALE66; (2006)11SCC42; 2006(3)SLJ275(SC)

the employee concerned had sufficient explanation for not reporting to duties after the period of leave had expired or failure on to the provisions of the act which includes all appointments powers duties and affairs of the university section 18 of the is not disputed that the matters relating to terms and conditions of services as also disciplinary action are governed by the the order of the government involves a termination of the service when the incumbent is willing to serve the regulation involves other clauses contained in section 17 or 18 of the act any modification amendment substitution thereof was required to be carried rajasthan 1966 iillj140sc and deokinandan prasad v state of bihar 1971 illj557sc stating i may first refer to the decision of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2006 (SC)

Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur Vs. Om Prakash Dubey

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-05-2006

Reported in : AIR2007SC893; 2007(1)AWC422(SC); [2007(112)FLR810]; (2007)ILLJ1026SC; RLW2007(3)SC1804; 2006(13)SCALE266; (2007)1SCC373; 2007(3)SLJ31(SC); 2007AIRSCW589; 2007(1)KCCRSN6

be a time bound one it was not meant for generating employment it was meant for providing technical education to the force no regularisation is permissible in exercise of the executive powers of the government under article 162 thereof in contravention of appointed by the corporation on daily wages the terms and conditions of their appointment are not known it is however not for short the act indisputably the terms and conditions of service of its employees are governed by statutory rules yet again fiat and such a course is not permissible because an act done in the exercise of the executive power of the jurisdiction under section 12 of the contempt of courts act 1971 without arriving at a finding as to how the corporation

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 2006 (SC)

Indian Airlines Ltd. Vs. Prabha D. Kanan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-10-2006

Reported in : AIR2007SC548; JT2006(10)SC334; (2007)IILLJ113SC; 2006(12)SCALE58; (2006)11SCC67; 2007AIRSCW103; 2007(2)AIRKarR56(SC)

terms of s o 32 the order made by the general manager is unsustainable 6 the validity or otherwise of the framework of the constitution and power mingled with obligations and duties enjoined with rights are matters of constitutional adjustment at any under the 1953 act survives and consequently the exercise of powers under regulation 13 shall be void ab initio 30 our mention them section 8 only protects the remuneration terms and conditions and rights and privileges of those who were in air fair treatment the conferment of absolute power to terminate the services of an employee is an antithesis to fair just and arriving at a conclusion is a reasonable apprehension that the act on the part of the employee would be detrimental to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2006 (SC)

i.i.T. Kanpur Vs. Umesh Chandra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2006

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR420]; JT2006(5)SC326; 2006(5)SCALE182; (2006)5SCC664

perusal of the said advertisement it would appear that no general qualification was fixed therefore a person having no educational qualification of proto type glides and to discharge various related administrative duties for running the center persons with higher category of flying to the public at large subject to their fulfilling certain conditions in this regard 5 that it is specifically stated and the committee noted that capt chandra had joined the institute service on 18 1 1980 as a junior pilot instructor he administration and working of the institute section 27 of the act contemplates framing of statutes providing for the matters enumerated in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 2006 (SC)

P.D. Agrawal Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC2064; [2006(110)FLR1]; JT2006(5)SC235; (2006)IILLJ877SC; 2006(5)SCALE54; (2006)8SCC776

undergone a sea change d in ajit kumar nag v general manager pj indian oil corporation ltd haldia and ors air2005sc4217 superiors you also displayed gross negligence in performance of your duties b by your acts you disobeyed the lawful and reasonable of dismissal from service this court may not exercise its power of judicial review there is authority for the proposition that the part of the appellant herein 12 the terms and conditions of the employees of the respondent bank are governed by misconduct and then to turn round and contend that his services should have been terminated on the ground that he was implied by the very nature and impact of the order action the court or the tribunal should make a distinction between

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2006 (SC)

Nagar Mahapalika (Now Municipal Corpn.) Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2006

Reported in : AIR2006SC2113; [2006(109)FLR1092]; JT2006(5)SC318; (2006)IILLJ748SC; 2006(5)SCALE145; (2006)5SCC127; 2007(1)SLJ118(SC)

in the prescribed manner 3 that without prejudice to the generality of the provision of sub sections 1 and 2 such the service as well as the officers and servants performing duties and functions of those posts under sub clause 1 of by the state government section 111 of the adhiniyam confers power on the state government to make appointments where any authority a letter dated 19 12 1985 subject to the following conditions 3 only ad hoc appointments are to be made on they having been appointed on daily wages their disengagement from services cannot be construed to be retrenchment under the provisions of with the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act was thus illegal he however had unjustly been directed to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //