Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: allahabad Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.982 seconds)Raja Ram Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jul-10-2002
Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2459; [2002(94)FLR1121]
to the submissions made across the bar the terms and conditions of service of permanent employees are laid down in statute consequential benefits parties are directed to bear their own costs service continuation of service statute 13 2 of statutes of indian institute of technology statute framed under the institute of technology act 1961 prescribes the age of superannuation of a confirmed appointee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Dec-16-2002
Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2224; (2003)1UPLBEC489
a particular public purpose section 4 compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held renewal of lease in favour of 21 5 2002 thereby rescinding the appointment and terminating the services of the petitioner is the government order aforestated 3 learned acquire a particular land land acquisition is not purely ministerial act to be performed by executive no direction in nature of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEss Bee Packagers (P.) Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-31-2002
Reported in : 2003(2)AWC1054; II(2003)BC305; [2003]117CompCas366(All)
company for financial year 1997 98 were finalised by adopting auditor s report in annual general meeting convened in the month act 1956 provides for placing of annual accounts before annual general meeting by the board of directors of the company there a particular public purpose section 4 compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held renewal of lease in favour of company or upon its own knowledge as to the financial condition of the company these three sources have been provided in issued to them on 17 4 2002 upon which the service is deemed to be sufficient 3 since the matter does in public interest land acquisition is not a purely ministerial act to be performed by the executive and therefore no mandamus
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShahjade Vs. Chairman, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, U.P., Luck ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Apr-23-2002
Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1698; (2002)2UPLBEC1587
at par in other mandi samities paid same scale functions duties and powers of sachiv of various mandi samities were similar in other mandi samities paid same scale functions duties and powers of sachiv of various mandi samities were similar no classification no effect on the powers duties and functions and other conditions hence there is no reason to deny the pay scale can be posted in any mandi samiti in the centralised service rules no pay scales have been provided to any category
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnant Kumar Tiwari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Etc. Etc.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-21-2002
Reported in : (2002)2UPLBEC1327
counsels in the other writ petitions and the learned advocate general as well as learned chief standing counsel in opposition of a particular public purpose section 4 compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held renewal of lease in favour of equipment of any basic school or normal school on such conditions as it thinks fit g to receive grants subventions and and other employees under section 6 b the tenure of service remuneration and other terms and conditions of service of officers in the writ petitions 13 a bare perusal of the act of 1972 u p basic education act 1972 it reveals is regulated by the provisions of the basic education act 1971 and 1981 rules thus nothing has left to be provided
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatya NaraIn Shukla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Nov-01-2002
Reported in : (2003)1UPLBEC580
cases as may be specified by the central government by general or special order 2 a confidential report shall also be and he has got the satisfactory intelligence for discharging his duties and is fit for the promotion how can in such a particular public purpose section 4 compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held renewal of lease in favour of of the accepting authority and also lays down the certain conditions under which accepting authority shall not accept and countersign the of the petitioner who is a member of indian administrative services in the panel for the post of additional secretary and acquire a particular land land acquisition is not purely ministerial act to be performed by executive no direction in nature of 2 scc sic nareshwar lal joshi v state of rajasthan 1971 1 slr 1655 snkhdeo v commissioner amravati division 1996 5
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaveen Gun House and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Dec-13-2002
Reported in : AIR2003All187; 2003(2)AWC894; (2003)1UPLBEC709
construction it is well recognised cannon of construction that a general power should not be so interpreted as to nullify a entry 44 of list iii mentions stamp duties other than duties or fees collected by means of judicial stamps but not of constitution of india deals with the distribution of legislative powers as between the union and the state legislature with reference manufacture sale repairs etc of arms and ammunitions and the conditions have been laid down under section 5 of the arms grant or renew licences under rules made under the anns act further it is evident from the provisions of the arms v divisional joint registrar cooperative societies nagpur and anr air 1971 bom 365 in which it was held by the bombay
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTU.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. U.P. Public Service Tribunal ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-03-2002
Reported in : [2001(88)FLR315]; (2003)IILLJ1119All
a particular public purpose section 4 compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held renewal of lease in favour of his poor performance and in accordance with the terms and conditions of his employment if findings were arrived at in inquiry employer is bound to disclose the reasons for termination of services of such employee in pavanendra narayan verma v sanjay gandhi in public interest land acquisition is not a purely ministerial act to be performed by the executive and therefore no mandamus in the erstwhile u p government roadways on march 19 1971 on temporary basis and subsequent to creation of the corporation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmarnath Dwivedi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jul-16-2002
Reported in : (2002)3UPLBEC2219
manager administration in turn addressed a letter to the secretary general manager co operative spinning mills amroha dated 6 10 1998 agreement was not got signed before he had joined his duties 19 in view of the above and on the same a particular public purpose section 4 compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held renewal of lease in favour of under the same management and to make those terms and conditions widely known to all the workmen before they could be dearness allowance in lieu thereof the employee could leave the service by giving three months notice and when he failed to were working in their esablishments the underlying object of the act was to introduce uniformity in conditions of employment of workmen
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAwadhrani (Smt.) Vs. Director of Education (Basic) and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-24-2002
Reported in : (2002)2UPLBEC1921
school and basic training certificate examination to lay down by general or special orders in that behalf norms relating to the the petitioner named as school mata the nature of these duties by themselves suggest that working hours of the petitioner starts and group d employees rules 1984 made in exercise of powers under sub section 1 of section 19 of the u the same remuneration and upon the same other terms and conditions of service as he would have held the same if have not been above to point out any rule or service condition which provide for part time employment under the state in public interest land acquisition is not a purely ministerial act to be performed by the executive and therefore no mandamus
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT