Binding - Year 2003 - Judgments

Apr 01 2003 (SC)

Arm Group Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Waldorf Restaurant and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-01-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC4106; [2003(3)JCR59(SC)]; JT2003(3)SC450; 2003(3)SCALE499; (2003)6SCC423; [2003]3SCR222

..... 31 12 1951 allenberry company respondent no 3 herein was the contractual tenant of the original landlord on 12 8 1953 allenberry co ..... respect of the premises demised though the sub lease is not binding upon the landlord according to the agreement of lease the legislature ..... premises as sub tenant it is argued that this admission is binding on the appellant we have been taken through relevant parts of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2003 (HC)

A'Bad Municipal Corporation Vs. Dena Bank

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)2GLR1117

..... application for fixation of the standard rent and may therefore be liable to pay the contractual rent to the landlord but the hypothetical tenant to whom the building is hypothetically to ..... of the standard rent and the landlord was consequently entitled to continue to receive the contractual rent cannot therefore affect the applicability of the decisions in the life insurance corporation s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 2003 (HC)

Moran Mar Baselious Marthoma Mathews Ii Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-28-2003

Reported in: 2003(1)KLT780

..... petitioners maintain that the law declared by the supreme court is binding on all courts within the territory of india the civil and ..... the decision of their lordships of the supreme court is not binding on the parish churches the petitioners have no right to interfere ..... declaration given by their lordships was that the constitution of 1934 binds all the churches however sofar as the rights of the parish .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 03 2003 (HC)

Siddalingeshwar and ors. Vs. Virupaxgouda and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-03-2003

Reported in: AIR2003Kant407; ILR2003KAR2559; 2004(2)KarLJ28

..... following the mandatory procedure prescribed under rule 3b a decree in a representative suit can bind non parties only if the procedural safeguards prescribed for representative suits are complied with similarly ..... of a relevant statutory provision therefore the said decision rendered per incurium is not a binding precedent re question iii 20 the children of virupaxgouda as the members of joint family .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 14 2003 (HC)

Premavathy @ Rajathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Gove ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-14-2003

Reported in: 2004CriLJ1475; 2004(2)CTC10

..... learned counsel therefore says that the supreme court has declared a binding law under art 141 holding that the placement of the foreigners ..... in kalavathy s case it was a declared law and was binding under art 141 of the constitution of india for better understanding ..... incurium and such decisions which are per incurium would have no binding force we have also seen the full bench decision of this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2003 (HC)

Golden Colour Lab and Studio and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Commerci ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-30-2003

Reported in: ILR2003KAR4883; [2003]134STC570(Kar)

..... there is a need to make a distinction between a mere obiter dictum which is a passing remark and observations made by the ..... point raised considered in detail and decided after examination will be binding as the law declared under article 141 eventhough it was ..... act is unconstitutional for want of legislative competence continues to be binding on the respondents iii as a consequence it is declared that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2003 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohanlal Aggarwal

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-05-2003

Reported in: (2004)1GLR637; [2004]53SCL330(Guj)

..... contract between two individuals not involving any public interest or statutory regulation of contractual freedom 23 1 the standardised prospectus of the mediclaim insurance policy a copy ..... contract of mediclaim insurance business prudence theory does not warrant escapement from the contractual obligations these government insurance companies therefore cannot arbitrarily refuse the cover which is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2003 (TRI)

Peerless General Finance and Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-07-2003

Reported in: (2003)79TTJ(Kol.)915

..... supra is therefore not acceptable accordingly to the learned counsel the cbdt circulars instructions are binding upon the tax authorities and may be given effect by the tribunal and the courts ..... of the constitution unequivocally indicates that the law declared by the supreme court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of india the aforesaid article empowers the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2003 (TRI)

Peerless General Finance and Vs. Jt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-07-2003

Reported in: (2003)85ITD215(Kol.)

..... supra is therefore not acceptable according to the learned counsel the cbdt circulars instructions are binding upon the tax authorities and may be given effect by the tribunal and the courts ..... of the constitution unequivocally indicates that the law declared by the supreme court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of india the aforesaid article empowers the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 2003 (TRI)

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-27-2003

Reported in: (2004)49SCL117SAT

..... counsel for the defendants strongly objected to our looking into those judgements which are neither binding precedents nor had persuasive value judgements of the district courts of the united states of ..... candidly submitted that those judgements have not been produced before this court because of their binding nature or persuasive value but for the very limited purpose of establishing that such orders .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Binding - Judgment Search Results