Skip to content


Binding - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: binding Year: 1938 Page 1 of about 479 results (0.035 seconds)
Feb 28 1938 (FN)

St. Paul Mercury Indem. Co. Vs. Red Cab Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-28-1938

a contract of insurance with the petitioner evidenced by a binder whereby the petitioner insured the respondent against loss or expense

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 1938 (PC)

Vadavalli Narasimha Rao and ors. Vs. V. Ayyanna Rao

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-07-1938

Reported in: AIR1939Mad794; (1939)1MLJ445

an offence under section 430 indian penal code had been committed because the act of bunding up the channel did not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1938 (FN)

United States Ex Rel. Willoughby Vs. Howard

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-03-1938

united states ex rel willoughby v howard 302 u s 445 1938 u s supreme court united states ex rel...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 1938 (FN)

Schriber-schroth Co. Vs. Cleveland Trust Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-07-1938

schriber schroth co v cleveland trust co 305 u s 47 1938 u s supreme court schriber schroth co v...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 1938 (PC)

Maneklal Kalidas Shah Vs. the Yorkshire Insurance Company Limited

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-02-1938

Reported in: AIR1939Bom161; (1939)41BOMLR353

..... life statement of age by assured admission of age by insurance company admission binding on company admission not so binding if induced by fraud onus of proof in the case of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 1938 (PC)

R. Shanmuga Rajeswara Sethupathi, Raja of Ramnad Vs. Chidambaram Chett ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-27-1938

Reported in: (1938)40BOMLR767

..... to enforce the two mortgages but failed on the ground that the mortgages were not binding on the trust estate when the plaintiff sued next to enforce the three hypothecation bonds .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 1938 (PC)

Chockalingam Chettiar Vs. Meyappa Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-28-1938

Reported in: AIR1939Mad228; (1938)2MLJ287

..... him of interest which was after the retirement of jayangondan would bind only himself and not the other partners of the firm eventually ..... am assuming for the purpose of this discussion that they were binding upon a i am also assuming that the learned judges who ..... be unnecessary and the exclusion of illegal and immoral but legally binding debts would be illogical they would be as liable as their .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1938 (FN)

Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson Vs. Brand

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-31-1938

..... contract between appellee and appellants for the reason that a contract which does not bind both parties binds neither of them this proposition is undoubtedly supported by the law of contracts but ..... which the respondent relies is distinguishable because the statute there involved did not purport to bind the respondent by contract to the payment of retirement annuities and similar legislation in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 1938 (PC)

Midnapore Zamindary Co. Ltd. Vs. Chandra Singha Dudhuria and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-29-1938

Reported in: AIR1939Cal1

..... covenants contained in the putni patta and consequently of the contractual rights of the defendants being affected by the entry would ..... therefore hold that the stipulations contained in this patta are binding on the plaintiffs and that they are precluded by this ..... the controversy between the proprietors and the patnidars about their contractual rights or the breach thereof the cause of action against .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1938 (PC)

Manmatha Nath Sett Vs. Gobindalall Sett and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-05-1938

Reported in: AIR1939Cal135

..... land acquisition judge made in respect of the said compensation money binding on the actual reversioners of debendra mohan sett including the ..... the widow bona fide for the benefit of the estate may bind the reversioners even though they were not parties thereto they ..... or to prevent wrongful alienation operates as res judicata and binds the whole body of reversioners but none of the transactions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //