Skip to content


Binding - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: binding Year: 1934 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.281 seconds)
Dec 18 1934 (PC)

Sumeshar Bind and ors. Vs. Baldeo Sahu and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-18-1934

Reported in: AIR1935All390; 157Ind.Cas.51; 159Ind.Cas.683

orderrachhpal singh j 1 this is a revision application by the defendants arising out of a suit instituted by the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 1934 (PC)

Jahan Singh Vs. Dr. Hardat Singh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-01-1934

Reported in: AIR1935All247; 152Ind.Cas.487

..... the mortgagee and the mortgaged property had been sold was not binding on the family because there was no legal necessity for the ..... instituted a suit for a declaration that the mortgage was not binding upon them the only question for consideration was whether in that ..... unless the mortgage is to discharge antecedent debt it would not bind the estate the fourth rule is that antecedent means antecedent in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 1934 (FN)

Lynch Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-04-1934

..... reduce gratuities deemed excessive but congress was without power to reduce expenditures by abrogating contractual obligations of the united states to abrogate contracts in the attempt to lessen government ..... for suits against the united states footnote 10 congress as if to emphasize the contractual obligation assumed by the united states when issuing war risk policies conferred upon beneficiaries .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 1934 (PC)

Mullankandiyil Kundangat Chalil Krishnan and ors. Vs. Kandangat Chalil ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-20-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Mad38; 152Ind.Cas.17

..... courts below have found that the aforesaid mortgages are valid and binding on the tavazhi tarwad and in respect of those mortgages ..... circumstance alone is sufficient by itself to treat the alienation as binding on the tavazhi ignoring any evidence to the contrary would ..... particular case one of the tests usually applied in determining the binding character of an alienation of this kind is whether the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1934 (FN)

Home Building and Loan Assn. Vs. Blaisdell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-08-1934

..... contracts against impairment presupposes the maintenance of a government by virtue of which contractual relations are worthwhile a government which retains adequate authority to secure the peace ..... of the federal constitution in directly preventing the immediate and literal enforcement of contractual obligations by a temporary and conditional restraint where vital public interests would otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1934 (PC)

Sajjanpal Singh and ors. Vs. Mt. Harnaraini Kunwar

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-21-1934

Reported in: AIR1935All285; 157Ind.Cas.192

..... 8 the learned subordinate judge found that the award was not binding upon the plaintiff respondent mt har naraini kunwar because the arbitrators ..... go into the question whether the agreement and the award were binding upon the plaintiff respondent mt har naraini kunwar in the case ..... with the spes succession is on his behalf or bind him by any contractual agreement in respect thereof in the case of imrit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 1934 (PC)

Thakur Prasad Vs. Kasturi NaraIn Shukla

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-29-1934

Reported in: AIR1935All364

..... the gorakhpur court on 21st february 1930 held that the agreement was binding on the decree holder and dismissed the application for execution the decree ..... construed by the court below and it was rightly held to be binding on the decree holder 2 that is this court held that ..... holds that the order of this court dated 4th february 1932 is binding on the decree holder and that it cannot go beyond that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 1934 (PC)

Rati Lal Nanji and ors. Vs. Uttam Lal Sarcar and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-16-1934

Reported in: AIR1935Cal275,155Ind.Cas.842

..... decree in money suit no 207 and the subsequent proceeding thereof are not binding on the plaintiffs or either of them 3 that the sale in ..... in money suit no 207 and the sale in execution thereof are binding on the plaintiffs it is to be noticed in this connexion that ..... in the firm but any representation by one of the partners will not bind the other partner nanji if defendant 1 had only cared to look .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 12 1934 (PC)

Hiranand Khushiram Kirpalani Vs. the Secretary of State for India

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-12-1934

Reported in: AIR1934Bom379; (1934)36BOMLR820; 153Ind.Cas.142

..... contention is that the city of bombay municipal act 1888 does not bind him as representing the crown and that contention was upheld by ..... 71 which deals with easements other than the easement of light does bind the crown because the crown is mentioned therein but that section ..... 305 of the city of bombay municipal act 1888 did not bind the crown although there was in the english public health act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1934 (PC)

(Kaveripakkam) Bangarammal Vs. Lydia Kent and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-05-1934

Reported in: AIR1934Mad605; 152Ind.Cas.546

..... as benami or nominal was valid and that the sale is not binding upon the plaintiff who has been given a declaration accordingly the ..... allowed by the article for a declaration that the transaction is not binding upon him 7 the second question raised with regard to the ..... mortgages of 1913 and these having been executed by the father were binding upon them they were discharged out of the sale price and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //