Binding - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: binding Year: 1943 Page 1 of about 393 results (0.057 seconds)Secretary of State Vs. T.R.M.T.S.T. Thinnappa Chettiar and Others
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Apr-15-1943
sir madhavan nair this is an appeal from a decree of the high court of judicature at madras dated 26th...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.C. Pollard Vs. Satya Gopal Mazumdar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-24-1943
Reported in: AIR1943Cal594
as a court is satisfied that the alleged offence was committed if at all while the officer was acting or purporting
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPalmer Vs. Hoffman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-01-1943
palmer v hoffman 318 u s 109 1943 u s supreme court palmer v hoffman 318 u s 109 1943...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmil Vs. Hanley
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-15-1943
petitioner contends that 2 a 21 and 69d make it obligatory on the respondent as a nonbankruptcy receiver to account to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaghunath Keshav Khadilkar Vs. Poona Municipality and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-16-1943
Reported in: AIR1945Bom7
..... examinations declaration of results general instructions and method of admission etc this brochure is binding on the applicants as well as the authorities this brochure or admission notification issued ..... the process of admission and maintenance of standards of education had notified a legal binding document specifying dates and schedule for various matters in relation to admission of students .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Government Telephones Board Ltd. Vs. Hormusji Manekji Seerval
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-30-1943
Reported in: AIR1943Bom825; (1943)45BOMLR633
..... whether court can inquire into merits of scheme opinion of majority of shareholders how far binding on court exercise of the powers of compulsory purchase the import of section 153b of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThakorebai Shrinivas Khemraj Vs. the Central Bank of India, Limited
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-27-1943
Reported in: AIR1944Bom35; (1943)45BOMLR976
..... the family are regarded under rule 1 as sufficiently before the court so as to bind them by an order for sale they must be regarded also as sufficiently before the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahomed Siddique Yusuf Vs. Official Assignee
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-24-1943
Reported in: (1945)47BOMLR522
..... and 8 order of adjudication act of insolvency certain tranfer held act of insolvency order binding on transferee who is third party appeal by transferee person aggrieved extension of time for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMoulvi Ali HossaIn Mian and ors. Vs. Rajkumar Haldar and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-02-1943
Reported in: AIR1943Cal417
..... person the solenama further provided that the stipulation would be binding not only on the contracting parties but on their heirs ..... their refusal all the terms of the compromise were made binding on the executants their heirs and representatives four of the contracting ..... assignee therefore the company must admit that it somehow binds the land but if it binds the land it creates an equitable interest in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlla Venkataramanna Vs. Palacherla Manqamma and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-05-1943
Reported in: AIR1944Mad457
..... the latter was no party to it not because such judgment binds him as res judicata but because the claim against which ..... only the question whether the charge created under the indemnity bond binds defendant 2 s interest in the properties which are joint family ..... appellant for discharging antecedent debts of defendant 1 and was therefore binding on defendant 2 s interest in hypotheca as already stated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial