Binding - Judgment Search Results

Surya Properties Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bimalendu Nath Sarkar and o ...

Court: Kolkata

..... 2 h of the west bengal premises tenancy act 1956 includes all classes of tenants contractual and statutory holding tenancies for manufacturing or other purposes and also tenants for fixed periods ..... it would be opportune here to consider how such tenancies arc terminated so far as contractual tenancies are concerned the duration thereof and the termination of such tenancies are governed by .....

Hedley Byrne and Company Limited Vs. Heller and Partners Limited

Court: House of Lords

..... they would be liable if they were negligent although there being no consideration no enforceable contractual relationship was created in the absence of any direct dealings between one person and ..... principle and in accordance with earlier authorities mr gardiner for the appellants agrees that outside contractual and fiduciary duty there must be a relationship of proximity 8212 that is donoghue .....

Jaswantlal Linabhai Vs. Nichhabhai Vallabhbhai and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1964Guj283; (1964)0GLR161

..... the opinion of courts has been brought out itis stated an obiter dictum is an expression of opinion on a point which is not ..... the supreme court on that question then the opinion would be binding upon us in our opinion the aforesaid observations in the privy ..... opinion was deliberately or advisedly given even if amounted to an obiter dictum it was an opinion which was expressed by the privy council .....

Loganathan Minor and anr., by Next Friend and Guardian A. Sundaram Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1964Mad327

..... the promissory note was an avyavaharika debt and hence not binding on the plaintiffs and that the execution of the promissory ..... subordinate judge was whether the debt under the promissory note was binding on the plaintiffs and whether the suit promissory note executed ..... debt itself incurred by their father is illegal and not binding on them being ayyavaharika debt they contended that the liability .....

Locomotive Engineers Vs. Louisville and N. R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 8 subsection m makes awards of the adjustment board final and binding upon both parties to the dispute except insofar as they shall ..... adjustment board the logic of chicago river is that final and binding awards of the adjustment board are enforceable in favor of or ..... in which the board s decisions are expressly not final and binding the legislative history is not merely uninstructive as to today s .....

Machinists Vs. Central Airlines

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the carriers and their employees by the railway labor act binding and their breach redressable in the federal courts such as ..... statute and the federal law which must determine whether the contractual arrangements made by the parties are sufficient to discharge the ..... and that the federal law would look with favor upon contractual provisions affording some degree of finality to system board awards .....

Thakur Dan Singh Bisht Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1964All128

..... question as to whether or not the respondent could plead a binding contract against the appellant on the basis of the letters and ..... air1960pat159 held that a contract entered into in order to be binding end enforceable against the state government must be made in strict ..... not deal with the question as to whether or not a binding contract between the government and a private individual can be culled .....

The Jaipur Udyog Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1965Raj162

..... therefore they shall have to be given greater sanctity than to those which are mere contractual obligations he has contended that such obligations can be abrogated only by a legislative measure ..... the company to claim exemption under the provisions of the agreement in our opinion no contractual obligation whether devolving on the government by virtue of the constitutional provisions or otherwise can .....

The Official Receiver Vs. Iswar Baldev Jiu and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1963Cal647

..... the general body of shebaits 15 are the said leases still binding on the defendant deities and or the debutter estate 16 has ..... against such a transferee for a declaration that the sale was not binding after quoting order 40 rule 1 the acting chief justice ranganekar ..... his life it would seem therefore that an alienation will not bind the institution in the absence of necessity or benefit even during .....

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. A.R. Chacko

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1964SC1522; (1964)ILLJ19SC; [1964]5SCR625

..... is difference between an award being in operation and an award being binding on the parties the different provisions made by the legislature in ..... award does not cease to be effective for it continues to be binding thereafter on the parties until notice has been given by one ..... of operation of the award and the period for which it remains binding on the parties may elapse in respect of both of which .....