Binding - Judgment Search Results

Barrentine Vs. Arkansas-best Freight Sys.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that any controversy between the parties to the agreement be resolved through the binding contractual grievance procedures see n 5 supra they further note that local 878 processed ..... bargaining agreement make an employee s entitlement to substantive statutory rights subject to contractual dispute resolution procedures the national policy favoring collective bargaining and industrial self government .....

K.A. Lona Etc. Vs. Dada Haji Ibrahim Hilari and Co. and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1981Ker86

..... is whether the instrument is so drawn that in form it binds the firm it is not sufficient that the firm name is mentioned ..... third defendant was competent to execute the promissory notes so as to bind defendants 1 and 2 this finding is challenged by the learnedcounsel ..... or in any other manner expressing or implying an intention to bind the firm relevant portion of section 27 of negotiable instruments act .....

T.G. Srinivasa Murthy, Etc., Etc. Vs. Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. Etc., E ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1982KAR622; (1982)ILLJ268Kant

..... in the regulations have no statutory force and they were only contractual in nature therefore the contention of the petitioner that the ..... the nature of status it is much more than a purely contractual relationship voluntarily entered into between the parties the duties or ..... that is how the argument based on the contract and its binding character arises if a person while entering service executes a .....

Democratic Party Vs. WisconsIn Ex Rel. La Follette

Court: US Supreme Court

..... presidential preference or uncommitted status of the primary voters or if there is no binding primary the convention and caucus participants except that preferences securing less than the applicable ..... electoral statutes involved in this controversy are constitutional in full force and effect and binding on the petitioner and respondents that the presidential preference primary shall be conducted in .....

Biju Patnaik Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)3ITD693(Delhi)

..... under section 16a would the report of the valuation officer be binding otherwise if there were no circumstances justifying a reference to the ..... 1bb was procedural it was contended that rule 1bb was not binding on the valuation officer his contention was that rule 1bb became ..... case supra by the allahabad high court and which binds the wto also binds the valuation officers who are part of the machinery .....

Clayton Vs. Automobile Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that aggrieved employees exhaust internal remedies might lead to nonjudicial resolution of some contractual grievances for example an employee who exhausts internal union procedures might decide not ..... grievance exhaustion would advance the national labor policy of encouraging private resolution of contractual labor disputes in such cases the internal union procedures are capable of fully .....

Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. Vs. Hall

Court: US Supreme Court

..... proposition that the commission itself lacks affirmative authority absent extraordinary circumstances to abrogate existing contractual arrangements permian basin area rate cases supra at 390 u s 820 see united ..... that condition plaintiffs filing with the commission by failing to inform plaintiffs of its contractual arrangements with the united states government pursuant to article 2040 and this court .....

Kausar HuseIn Mohamed HushIn Vs. Mohamed Umer Bhota and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1982Bom91

..... the landlords by reason of being a lawful sub tenant on the tenancy of original contractual tenant being determined and had thereafter transferred possessionn thereof to the plaintiff and one mohamed ..... connection with the contention that the tenant s title had never been determined and his contractual title had merged with the statutory title and therefore even according to explanation to s .....

Karnataka State Financial Corporation Vs. Sri Nithyananda Bhavan and a ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1982Kant179; ILR1981KAR1347; 1981(2)KarLJ321

..... was a commercial transaction and 11 per cent interest was a contractual rate of interest agreed upon between the parties and the ..... the question is whether the corporation should be denied of this contractual rate of interest for the period during which the proceedings were ..... or the liability of the respondent to collect or pay the contractual rate of interest at 11 per cent before the parties .....

Dev Raj Dogra and Others Vs. Gyan Chand JaIn and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC981; 1981(29)BLJR412; 1981(1)SCALE663; (1981)2SCC675; [1981]3SCR174; 1981(13)LC641(SC)

..... where without delivering possession of the mortgaged property the mortgagor binds himself personally to pay the mortgage money and agrees expressly ..... that the leases were collesive transactions and were otherwise not binding on him the trial court dismissed the suit holding ..... that the leases were collusive transactions and were otherwise not binding on him this contention was negatived by this court .....