Binding - Judgment Search Results

Allied Structural Steel Co. Vs. Spannaus

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for homeowners threatened with foreclosure although the legislation conflicted directly with lenders contractual foreclosure rights the court there acknowledged that despite the contract clause the ..... sought to regulate the minnesota legislature grossly distorted the company s existing contractual relationships with its employees by superimposing retroactive obligations upon the company substantially .....

J. W. Bateson Co., Inc. Vs. Board of Trustees

Court: US Supreme Court

..... payment bond as required by the miller act to protect those who have a direct contractual relationship with either the prime contractor or a subcontractor bateson then subcontracted a portion of ..... colquitt were not similarly protected against colquitt s default because they did not ave a contractual relationship with pierce or any other subcontractor footnote 5 this view of what was intended .....

Hargovind Dharamsey and Co. and Others Vs. Ruby and Co.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1979Bom89

..... that section 15 which inter alia prohibits transfers and assignment of tenancies applies only to contractual tenancies and not to statutory tenancies the notification under the proviso to section 15 ..... 1 would also therefore apply to only contractual tenancies of business premises this reasoning of the supreme court has however been expressly .....

Tata Chemicals Ltd. Vs. the Workmen Represented by Chemicals Kamdar Sa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC828; [1978(36)FLR339]; (1978)0GLR575; 1978LabIC637; (1978)IILLJ22SC; (1978)3SCC42; [1978]3SCR535

..... section 3 an arbitration award which has become enforceable shall be binding on the parties to the agreement who referred the dispute to ..... at in the course of conciliation proceeding under the act is binding not only on the parties to the industrial dispute but also ..... workman otherwise than in the course of conciliation proceeding shall be binding on the parties to the agreement whereas s 18 3 provides .....

M.M. Abbas Brothers and ors. Vs. Seth Chethandas Fathechand and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)1MLJ280

..... are supported by consideration and that the signature of moshin bhai binds them i shall first examine the question whether the promissory ..... consider the next point that the signatures of moshin bbai cannot bind these defendants as mentioned earlier two promissory notes were executed ..... his contention that the signature of moshin bhai did not bind them only as regards exhibit a 3 his contention was .....

Texmaco Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1979Cal44,(1981)1CompLJ356(Cal)

..... cent of the price guaranteeing orderly performance of texmaco s contractual obligations 4 thereafter at the request of texmaco the bank ..... guarantee that texmaco shall perform in an orderly manner their contractual obligations under the back to back contract and in the ..... of this guarantee period any wagons remain undelivered or the contractual guarantee period in respect of wagons has not expired the .....

Arakkal Rohini and anr. Vs. Arakkal Koottappanakkal A.K. Sethumadhavan ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1978Ker119

..... supported by family necessity or benefit and therefore not valid and binding for defendants 2 and 3 they were sought to be justified ..... as a whole can be made liable only for the debts binding on the illom once however it is granted that individual members ..... of the actual scope of the said decision and the mere obiter dictum nature of the observation therein regarding pious obligation being excluded by .....

Venkatesh Dhonddev Deshpande Vs. Sou. Kusum Dattatraya Kulkarni and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1791; (1979)1SCC98; [1979]1SCR955

..... the partition being a genuine one the subsequent sale is not binding upon the plaintiffs to whose share the suit land was allotted ..... which was offered as security for that loan would not be binding upon the plaintiffs as the plaintiffs were not borrowers within the ..... authority to borrow money for family purposes and such debts are binding on other coparceners and the liability of the coparceners in such .....

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... that article 21 presupposes that the law is a valid and binding law under the provisions of the constitution having regard to the ..... its intention but whether any particular act of parliament purports to bind british subjects abroad will always depend upon the intention of the ..... even outside india the universal declaration of human rights was not binding as law but was only a pious hope for achieving a .....

Flagg Bros., Inc. Vs. Brooks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... well be as my brother stevens dissent contends that t he power to order legally binding surrenders of property and the constitutional restrictions on that power are necessary correlatives in our ..... the sense that it prescribes the procedures that warehousemen must follow to complete a legally binding sale footnote 2 14 furthermore if the warehouseman has deviated from the statutory requirements the .....