Answer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: answer Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 5,184 results (0.074 seconds)Nidhi Kaim Vs. State of M P and Ors Etc
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-12-2016
..... other candidates resorted to unfair means in large scale by adopting planned strategy in answering their question papers it was revealed that the appellants and other candidates in connivance ..... proximity in examination centre copied from each other the committee examined their answer papers and found that answers were matching with each other their results were accordingly cancelled which led .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohit Panwar and Others Vs. Airports Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2016
..... 1 each belong to up and andhra pradesh 2 answering pattern the answering pattern of the petitioners who appeared in the ..... point that the nature of statistics including the correct answers wrong answers does support irregularities he may be right in suggesting ..... nameresidential addressmarks obtained in written examwrong answerssl no of wrong answers having same option of the candidates who have scored .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnil Kumar and Others Vs. Registrar General High Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2016
..... supra on the permissible extent of judicial review of an answer key first the answer key must be presumed to be correct and must be ..... what notice of dishonor is sufficient 25 option 1 is the correct answer and the argument that even option 2 is available and therefore ..... of possession by b was under a jural relationship with c the answer would have beencorrect 38 as regards the last question we find .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSumit Kumar and Another Vs. High Court of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-09-2016
..... objective type with the stipulation that there would be 25 negative marking for an incorrect answer 4 the preliminary examination had 200 objective type multiple choice questions and candidates were ..... eligibility requirement was 55 marks 5 by public noticed dated 26th december 2015 the model answer key for the preliminary examination was released and objections were invited the two petitioners .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Jayalakshmi and Others Vs. Teacher Recruitment Board, rep by its Ch ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
..... the present case 31 when the experts have categorically stated that the final key answers are correct answers i do not find any reason to discredit their opinion 32 in these ..... final key in respect of chemistry which reads as hereunder question no of d serieskey answer of the petitionertentative keyfinal key13add54abb61dcc103cdd49abb further the member secretary has stated that the petitioners .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.K. Selvendran, Minor Vs. The Director of Government Examination, Che ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-05-2016
..... arise however the learned senior counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner had correctly answered the three questions in issue and officials of the respondents ought to have given full ..... would be arbitrary as indicated above the scope for interference in matters of evaluation of answer papers is very limited for compelling reasons and apparent infirmity in evaluation the court step .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
..... precedents we have thus identified certain broad steps for our discussion before attempting to answer the specific questions 5 on the above subjects learned eminent counsel appearing before ..... subjects relevant on questions falling for our considerations fifthly our conclusions and sixthly our answers fourth part contains following subjects a legislative history and debates in constituent assembly on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSagar Sanjeev Dua Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2016
..... students the objections once received are placed before the experts who after examining the various answers give their view it is contended that several objections were received by the respondents ..... information bulletin for neet 2016 specifically stipulates that there is no provision for rejecting reevaluation answer sheets 12 furthermore a coordinate bench of this court in atul kumar verma supra .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjay Kumar M. Singh Vs. Basant Bhoruka
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-18-2016
..... cannot own the said suit property 14 3 the plaintiff in his cross examination question answer 21 and question answer 22 admitted that he was aware that tci was the owner of the property and ..... original plaintiff mr j p karwa assigned any reason for such dis agreement the plaintiff answered the same in the negative therefore the original plaintiff though available has chosen not to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
..... mandatorily required to be obtained and therefore is condition precedent question no 3 a is answered accordingly 3 b whether prior recommendations of mczma are necessary before change of reservation zoning ..... in respect of questions no 10 and 11 are overlapping we deem it appropriate to answer these questions together before we consider case of the petitioners as regards violation of principles .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial