Skip to content


Answer - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: answer Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 408 results (0.064 seconds)
Feb 12 1986 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Motor Industries Co. Ltd.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-12-1986

Reported in: (1986)54CTR(Kar)312; [1988]173ITR374(KAR); [1988]173ITR374(Karn)

..... the income tax department appearing for the revenue has urged for answering question no 1 in favour of the revenue on the very ..... supply system of the assesses 11 sri srinivasan in urging for answering this question in favour of the revenue was bitterly critical of ..... in computing the business income 22 sri srinivasan in urging for answering this question in favour of the revenue has strongly relied on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1986 (SC)

State Bank of Travancore Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-08-1986

Reported in: AIR1986SC757; (1986)2CompLJ126(SC); (1986)50CTR(SC)290; [1986]158ITR102(SC); 1986(1)SCALE34; (1986)2SCC11; [1986]1SCR25; 1986(2)LC208(SC)

..... court following the decision herein took a similar view and answered a similar question against the assessee for the subsequent year ..... though regularly employed determine accrual of real income since the answer to the second question has been already indicated in the ..... high court confirmed the ultimate conclusion of the tribunal by answering the relevant question referred to it in favour of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 28 1986 (TRI)

Sri Mahalakshmi Finance Corpn. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Jul-28-1986

Reported in: (1986)19ITD494(Hyd.)

..... of vizianagaram hereinafter called the ninth partner represented by father and natural guardian thanikachalam answer both the above partnership deeds are correct except change in serial numbers of the ..... dhanasekharan is a partner in shri mahalaxmi finance corporation vizianagaram what is your reply answer shri dhanasekharan is not a partner in the firm of shri mahalaxmi finance corporation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 1986 (TRI)

income-tax Officer Vs. Panchganga Sahakari Pani

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on: Feb-25-1986

Reported in: (1986)16ITD183(Pune.)

..... prescribed applications under the bombay irrigation act or were the applications made by the members answer the assessee society is required to pay water charges to the government not under the ..... the water falls within the words or other articles intended for agriculture is concerned our answer is in the affirmative for agriculture besides implements seeds and livestock the agriculturist also needs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 1986 (FN)

Celotex Corp. Vs. Catrett

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-25-1986

..... the district court in particular petitioner noted that respondent had failed to identify in answering interrogatories specifically requesting such information any witnesses who could testify about the decedent ..... opposing affidavits the judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings depositions answers to interrogatories and admissions on file together with the affidavits if any show .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 12 1986 (HC)

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Laxmi Cotton Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-12-1986

Reported in: [1987]65STC119(Bom)

..... matter as the question referred in that regard has already been answered by this court the coal in question was obtained from collieries ..... the supplementary statement is received the high court can proceed to answer the question in view of this decision of the supreme ..... there is no material on the record of the tribunal to answer the question raised although the material comprises a single document .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 1986 (HC)

Meenakshi Ashokbhai Doshi Vs. Ashok Dhirajlal Doshi

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-06-1986

Reported in: 1989(1)BomCR156

..... amendment of the written statement the respondent can have no answer to the petitioner s demand for divorce evidently therefore the ..... new advocate meaning thereby miss bandukwala the witness has very appropriately answered the question by stating that she had taken out the ..... in the cross examination the only inference can be that the answer to that question would be inconvenient or damaging for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 1986 (HC)

Vedprakash Devkinandan Chiripal and Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-03-1986

Reported in: AIR1987Guj253; (1987)2GLR1345

..... 4 1986 and granted stay as prayed for since the division bench felt difficulty in answering the question of maintainability of the special criminal application under art 226 of the constitution ..... to be placed before the appropriate court for proceeding further in accordance with law 60 answer accordingly criminal detention section 7 1 of prevention of black marketing and maintenance of supply .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 1986 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bengal Jute Mills Co. Ltd. (No. 1)

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-24-1986

Reported in: [1987]165ITR646(Cal)

..... p ltd s case 1978 111itr1 sc for the above reasons we answer the said question in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee ..... the imposition of interest in appeal 35 following the said decisions we answer question no 3 also in the affirmative and in favour of the ..... of the assessee on the evidence on record we are unable to answer question no 2 and we remand the matter to the tribunal for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1986 (HC)

Udaipur Soap Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Oct-23-1986

Reported in: (1987)60CTR(Raj)26; [1987]167ITR613(Raj)

..... firm to make an application in form no 11a as such the answer to question no 1 is in the affirmative 31 the remaining ..... questions are dependent on the answer to question no 1 being in the affirmative question no 2 consists ..... was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue 50 question no 4 is answered in favour of the department and against the assessee in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //