Answer - Judgment Search Results

Amalendu Santra Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1986Cal153

..... of his name from the selection list and requested the authority concerned for evaluating his answers nothing was done by the authority concerned in this respect hence an application under article ..... the petitioner in his supplementary affidavit are not in my opinion ambiguous and the key answers prepared by the respondents to those questions are not demonstratively wrong 17 therefore it appears .....

Wainwright Vs. Witt

Court: US Supreme Court

..... trial judge the court was required to impose the death sentence if each question was answered affirmatively a texas statute provided that a prospective capital juror shall be disqualified unless he ..... state of texas many capital sentencing juries are now asked specific questions often factual the answers to which will determine whether death is the appropriate penalty in such circumstances it does .....

Syndicate Bank Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1985)45CTR(Kar)68; [1985]155ITR681(KAR); [1985]155ITR681(Karn)

..... affirmative and weundertaking of the assessee company was decline to answer thesecond parta capital asset on which transfer capital of the ..... has havepart of the compensation amount could be to be answered in the neg ative attributed to the exempted assets likeagricultural ..... ontransfer of goodwill 6 whether the tribunal was justified in answers to these questionsnos 6 tolaw in holding that it was .....

D.L.F. United (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1986)53CTR(Del)356; [1986]159ITR339(Delhi)

..... not necessary to go into complete details for the purposes of answering the reference which was directed to be submitted at the instance ..... now necessary to examine each question separately for the purpose of answering the same the reasoning of the income tax officer and the ..... any way as the income of the assessed company we accordingly answer question no 2 in the negative in favor of the assessed .....

Bajaj Tempo Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (1985)14ITD1(Pune.)

..... oral and circumstantial evidence depends on the probabilities of getting correct answers to the following questions beyond any doubt the finding further ..... files and papers used to be there in the cupboard answer in the cupboard and in the filing cabinet the files ..... manager both of bajaj auto ltd and bajaj tempo ltd answer they were normal business files nothing important and confidential about .....

Wallace Vs. Jaffree

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the practice under review in fact conveys a message of endorsement or disapproval an affirmative answer to either question should render the challenged practice invalid footnote 43 the statement indicated ..... manifests a permissible purpose the court also relies on the admissions of governor james answer to the second amended complaint strangely however the court neglects to mention that there .....

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Shamsher Singh Bedi and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1986CriLJ293

..... 4 1983 an application for bail was moved by the answering respondent through his advocate the learned sub divisional judicial magistrate ..... the request of the deponent for bail holding that the answering respondent has alleged to have committed the offence punishable under ..... magistrate expressed earlier that no injury is attributed to the answering respondent under section 307 i p c the act of .....

Orient Enterprises Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)(5)LC2158Tri(Delhi)

..... addressed by the supplier you have no interest in the matter answer as the material was very old likely rejected and create ..... the consignment of 130 tons of skimmed milk powder from canada answer yes i have typed letters of orient enterprises addressed to the ..... any buyer in india for this consignment of skimmed milk powder answer since this consignment is handed over to m s bakefood products .....

Rohiniben Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1985)13ITD830(Mum.)

..... is easily and undisputably the date of their acquisition 15 the answer to the first question is provided in the various decisions of ..... shekhawati general traders ltd s case supra the delhi high court answered the first question referred to them in the affirmative and in ..... any person seeking to acquire them considered in this manner the answer to the second question whether equity share is available at a .....

Umesh Chandra Shukla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1351; 1985(2)SCALE103; (1985)3SCC721; [1985]Supp2SCR367; 1985(2)SLJ412(SC); 1986(1)LC311(SC)

..... papers which are outside the syllabus extremely stiff valuation of the answer books by an examiner or any other reason relevant to the ..... question papers or the valuation of the answer books the reason given by the high court for adding the ..... the question papers or any irregularities in the valuation of the answer books it may be that some candidates had obtained high marks .....