Answer - Judgment Search Results

FranklIn Vs. Lynaugh

Court: US Supreme Court

..... was permitted to consider evidence presented at the guilt phase in the course of answering the special verdict questions the jury was specifically instructed to decide whether the evidence ..... supported affirmative answers to the special questions beyond a reasonable doubt app 15 emphasis added because of .....

Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1988(18)ECC358; 1988(19)LC131(Delhi); 1989(39)ELT211(Del)

..... of circumstances the equation personal and social which have a bearing on making an answer substantially innocent but ineffect guilty in import however fanciful claims unreasonable apprehensions and vague ..... that their lordships held that the accused person cannot be forced to answer question merely because the answers thereto are not implicative when viewed in isolation and confined to that .....

Mills Vs. Maryland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... arguably is construable as suggesting that the jury could leave an answer blank and proceed to the next step in its deliberations a ..... that the jury should proceed to the balancing stage leaving its answer to that circumstance blank the court directed that each juror weigh ..... circumstance not agreed to by all 12 they could leave that answer blank the jury exercised that option with respect to one .....

Pierce Leslie India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1988)71CTR(Kar)183; [1988]174ITR626(KAR); [1988]174ITR626(Karn); 1988(2)KarLJ147

..... court by order dated july 1988 174itr623 kar this court answered the question in the affirmative and against the assessee thereafter ..... books by the assessee the rajasthan high court declined to answer the reference thereafter when the application was made before the ..... to prevent miscarriage of justice 17 for the aforesaid reasons we answer the first question as follows this court has got inherent .....

Awadeesh Nema and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1989MP61

..... the candidates were told that they had to indicate their answers in the answer sheet and not in the test booklet now the ..... given to candidates printed on the question paper before proceeding to answer that question paper it was not disputed on behalf of ..... any other instructions to the contrary given anywhere and a separate answer sheet was admittedly provided to candidates along with the question .....

Indian Tea Packeting Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1988(18)ECC180

..... apart from repeating and reiterating their stand as taken initially denied the contentions of the answering respondents that blending of tea or packaging thereof is a process incidental or anciallary to ..... the said determination was on a reference where the specific question was required to be answered the submissions as above were also made by mr bhattacharjee while distinguishing the case of .....

Taylor Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... their testimony petitioner s counsel made an oral motion to further amend the discovery answer to include wormley counsel explained that wormley had probably seen the entire incident that ..... that the defendant was personally responsible for the discovery violations this question is not answered by merely pointing out that discovery like compulsory process serves truth seeking interests compare .....

Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1988)71CTR(Kar)166; ILR1988KAR2012; [1989]175ITR220(KAR); [1989]175ITR220(Karn); 1988(3)KarLJ460

..... with the view expressed by the madras high court accordingly i answer the second question in the affirmative and against the revenue iii ..... chemical ltd 1984 145itr416 kar against the revenue and is therefore answered in the affirmative and against the revenue 5 i now proceed ..... to deduction under section 37 of the act 35 i therefore answer the question as follows 36 on the facts and circumstances of .....

S.A. Jaffar Vs. the University of Gulbarga

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1989Kant174

..... records pertaining to the case of the petitioner together with answer papers in petrology and minerology and geophysics hydrogeology and drilling ..... the statements of objections filed and hold the had the answer scripts been produced this court would have found facts ..... and therefore arbitrarily deliberately they have withheld the production of answer scripts as the same are not forthcoming and as the .....

City Municipal Council Vs. C. Ramu

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1989KAR2138

..... the same do not call for interference 26 we accordingly hold and answer the point raised for determination in this appeal in the negative ..... much as no arguments were advanced on that issue therefore it was answered in favour of the plaintiff issue no 4 relating to notice ..... be estopped from contending to the contra accordingly point no 6 is answered in the affirmative point no 8 46 it is contended on .....