Answer - Judgment Search Results

C. Ramaiah Reddy Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (2003)87ITD439(Bang.)

..... the then learned vice president reframing the question into three thus recommending it for being answered by constituting a special bench the hon ble president has approved the aforesaid questions and ..... constituted a special bench ultimately resulting in the present members as constituents thereof surviving to answer the aforesaid three questions 17 2 i have already dealt with the objection raised by .....

Miller-el Vs. Cockrell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 44 boggess questionnaire question 58 allowed potential jurors to circle yes or no in answering the following question do you have any moral religious or personal beliefs that would ..... 367 rand the black veniremen who were given the graphic formulation by contrast gave ambiguous answers on their juror questionnaires expressing hesitation rather than philosophical opposition to the death penalty .....

Amarbir Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)135PLR661

..... vigilance bureau highlighted the following irregularities committed by the commission i the screening of answer sheets of competitive examination reveals that the favoured and tainted candidates were helped in ..... who were interviewed for selection for appointment by direct recruitment and by nomination the answer sheets of the petitioners and some other candidates showing over writing and cutting on .....

Jai NaraIn Modi Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR2003Raj340; RLW2004(1)Raj373; 2004(1)WLC201

..... the petitioner that there was difficulty in submitting the tender has also been contested the answering respondent has submitted that a committee was constituted to enquire into the allegations similar ..... allegations of mala fide and connivance therefore cannot stand for acceptance of tender of the answering respondent no amount of doubt can annul a legally justified acceptance because after passing .....

Shri C. Raman Reddy Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (2004)268ITR49(Bang.)

..... the then learned vice president reframing the question into three thus recommending it for being answered by constituting a special bench the hon ble president has approved the aforesaid questions and ..... constituted a special bench ultimately resulting in the present members as constituents thereof surving to answer the aforesaid three questions 17 2 i have already dealt with the objection raised by .....

Hariharan Vs. State by Deputy Superintendent of Police Cb Cid

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(1)CTC38

..... any criminal proceeding except prosecution for giving false evidence by such answer the provisions of proviso to s 132 evidence act clearly ..... therefore it is clear that a person who gave incriminating answers when examined as witness on the summons from court cannot ..... have promptly put her in the dock because of her incriminating answers overlooks section 132 proviso the prosecution was not bound to .....

In the Goods Of: Tara Sundari Ghosh (Decd.) and in Re: Rajendra Nath G ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(3)CHN288

..... indicates how the will was prepared and executed it transpires from the answer given by pw 1 to question no 97 that prior to making ..... her disposition in the will he has drawn my attention to the answers given by dw 2 sadhana banerjee to question nos 140 141 and ..... received her share of the assets and properties to her satisfaction her answer was that her mother could not do this she has further stated .....

Mid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)87ITD537(Mum.)

..... on behalf of the department before us there was no satisfactory answer to the question from the assessee s side the agenda ..... interested only in assets eligible for 100 per cent depreciation the answer is obvious the assessee was interested only in those assets which ..... by mr sahai the learned cit departmental representative which was not answered satisfactorily on behalf of the assessee is as to how the .....

The Icici Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit, Special Range 36

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... on behalf of the department before us there was no satisfactory answer to the question from the assessee s side the agenda note ..... should be interested only in assets eligible for 100 depreciation the answer is obvious the assessee was interested only in those assets which ..... minor points separately or in detail 157 in the result we answer the question referred to the special bench in the affirmative and .....

Chavez Vs. Martinez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 431 u s 801 806 1977 public employees may constitutionally be discharged for refusing to answer potentially incriminating questions concerning their official duties if they have not been required to surrender ..... made no effort to dispel the perception that medical treatment was being withheld until martinez answered the questions put to him there was no attempt through miranda warnings or other .....