Answer - Judgment Search Results

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sakthi Finance Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)210CTR(Mad)300; [2007]291ITR83(Mad)

..... from lessees towards sales tax represented only contingent deposits is answered in the negative in favour of the revenue and against ..... expression plant and accordingly confirming the order of the tribunal answered the reference in favour of the assesses and against the ..... supra hence the reference with regard to the second issue is answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against .....

Shri Bhupathi Rao Narra S/O Vs. the Secretary, Staff Selection

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

..... as specified in the notification as well as in the answer sheet his answer sheet was rejected by the computer a xerox copy of ..... roll numbers were wrongly coded by the candidates and accordingly the answer sheets were not valued through the computer treating them as invalid ..... and accordingly marking code was to be done failing which the answer sheet would be rejected and since the applicant did not .....

Uttecht Vs. Brown

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reasonable doubt that there are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency if you unanimously answered yes to this question the sentence would be death otherwise the sentence would be life ..... a juror who would not be considered so impaired unless he delivered only perfectly unequivocal answers during the unfamiliar and often confusing legal process of voir dire and was willing to .....

Smt. Shyamabai W/O Shriram Sharma (Since Deceased), Vs. Ramkisan S/O P ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)ALLMR189

..... proved that they are bonafide purchasers without notice of litigation answer not proved 6 i have heard advocate chauhan holding for advocate s ..... considering the controversy on merits question no a is thus answered in the affirmative 10 though agreement at exhibit 34 mentions time for ..... to him question number d e above are thus answered in negative i e against plaintiff and in favour of defendant present .....

<td Class=btext Bgcolor=#ffffff><span Class=boldtxt>parties :</Span> S ...

Court: House of Lords

..... whole averments and pleas about proportionality remitted to proof before answer the first division decided nevertheless to hear argument on this ..... the pii certificates had been lodged had been produced in answer to calls in specifications of documents approved by the court ..... scottish ministers the only respondents in the present proceedings are answerable for the alleged acts or defaults of the prison .....

Sempra Metals Limited (formerly Metallgesellschaft Limited) (Responden ...

Court: House of Lords

..... practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by community law 195 this answer establishes the principles by reference to which english courts must approach sempra s claim domestic ..... concerned have benefited as a result of the advance payment of tax by sempra the answer involves no requirement that the remedy should take any particular form an impression confirmed .....

Beggs (Ap) (Respondent) Vs. Scottish Ministers (Appellants) (Scotland)

Court: House of Lords

..... within the scottish executive it is the scottish ministers not the civil servants who are answerable for any breach of the undertaking this principle applies without exception irrespective of the various ..... they would not grant the respondent s crave that the ministers should appear personally to answer for their breach of undertaking nevertheless the court concluded that while the ministers should .....

M.K. Bansal S/O Shri T.R. Bansal Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... is evidence that applicant had gone to delhi to substitute his answer books simultaneously along with the other two candidates for which ..... relied on the fact that there are striking similarities in the answers given by some candidates in appendix iii a irem examination ..... and some from delhi centre yet there was similarity in their answers it was therefore essential to investigate how such a thing .....

Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and ors. Vs. Presiding Officer and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR773; 2007(3)BomCR646

..... found that respondent no 4 had indulged in malpractices while undertaking work of valuation of answer papers for higher secondary examination conducted by board in march 1992 hence all his honorarium ..... evaluation of all students on uniform basis respondent no 4 board is has been taking answer papers evaluated through different teachers identity of examinee student assessing teacher is kept secret by .....

Stack (Appellant) Vs. Dowden (Respondent)

Court: House of Lords

..... beneficial joint tenants unfortunately we lack precise findings on many of the factors relevant to answering that question because the judge addressed himself to looking at the parties entire course of ..... in which the beneficial interest is held certainty simplicity and first impression suggest a positive answer perhaps particularly where a home is bought almost exclusively by means of a mortgage more .....