Answer - Judgment Search Results

Maharaja Sayajirao University Vs. Ram Mangaram Mirchandani

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2002)1GLR861

p b majmudar j 1 the present special civil application is filed by the petitioner university challenging the order passed...

Penry Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... verdict form necessarily meant ignoring the command of the supplemental in 800 struction and answering the special issues in the mode prescribed by the supplemental instruction necessarily meant ignoring ..... the verdict form instructions indeed jurors who wanted to answer one of the special issues falsely to give effect to the mitigating evidence .....

S. Moorthy and ors. Vs. R. Sivanesan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ816

..... had either written xxxx s yyyy s or given fictitious names in the answer sheets while answering questions they mistakenly assumed that the said markings were contrary to the instructions ..... the instructions to candidates one was prohibited from writing any identifying mark in the answer book which would invalidate the candidate the controller of examinations incharge invalidated 255 candidates .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Balasaheb @ Ramesh Laxman Deshmukh

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(1)MhLj148

..... been committed by the witness as a result of such answer nor such answer will be available to anybody complainant in private case no ..... criminal proceeding except a prosecution for giving false evidence by such answer on going through the section it can be seen that ..... 841 bipin panchal v state of gujarat before compelling him to answer the question the only exception is prosecution for perjury giving .....

Ajit Singh Gill and ors. Vs. Arvind Khosla and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002(63)DRJ769

..... written statement it is alleged that suit property was purchased by answering defendant and defendant no 2 jointly from amrik singh pasricha ..... 25 000 was paid by the partnership firm creative fashions wherein answering defendant and defendant no 2 were partners in equal shares ..... put his lock at the entrance door on 27th january 1997 answering defendant sent a complaint to sho ps lajpat nagar stating .....

ioc Yarn Agency Vs. Samsons Processing Industries

Court: Kolkata

..... were raised on them they are issued the cheques the specific answer in this respect is given against question no 61 in cross ..... there was no agreement in between the plaintiff and defendant in answering question no 64 of cross examination in respect of forwarding ..... nirmal agarwal who happened to be accountant of the plaintiff in answering such question he stated that the claim amount under the demand .....

In Re: Xyz/Abc, Equity Fund

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

..... hypothetical question raised which also we do not propose to answer 39 we answer question no 1 in the affirmative and in favour of ..... the applicant company in india therefore the question no 3 is answered by saying that the facts stated may not make the investment ..... permanent establishment of the applicant in india question no 4 is answered in the negative on the facts stated in the application the .....

Mckune Vs. Lile

Court: US Supreme Court

..... determining whether there is compelled self incrimination but it does provide useful instruction for answering the latter inquiry sandin and its counterparts underscore the axiom that a convicted felon ..... does not permit the target of a criminal investigation to prevent his lawyer from answering a subpoena to produce incriminating documents we reached that conclusion because the person asserting .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.R. Metrani

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (2001)169CTR(Kar)149; [2001]251ITR244(KAR); [2001]251ITR244(Karn); [2002]120TAXMAN612(Kar)

..... presumption the assessee viz the hindu undivided family is not answerable for this claim counsel states that there should be a ..... question do you have a building at durgabail hubli under construction answer i have got one building at durgabail under construction question ..... his capacity as the hindu undivided family in these circumstances our answer to the reference is in favour of the revenue and .....

Quantum Information Systems Ltd. Vs. Electronics Trade and Technology ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001VAD(Delhi)185; 29(2001)DLT433; 2002(1)RAJ487

..... being carried out by the petitioner directly it was further agreed that the share of answering respondent towards renovation expenses which was to be paid by the petitioner would carry ..... claimed that the petitioner neither sent reply nor forwarded any account despite repeated reminders by answering respondent it is admitted that the letter dated 27th january 2001 terminating the agreement was .....