Answer - Judgment Search Results

Pillsbury Co. Vs. Conboy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the purposes of the use immunity statute regardless of whether had the witness answered voluntarily his answers could have been used against him in a later criminal trial the ..... believe respondent nevertheless retained his fifth amendment privilege if conboy had voluntarily answered petitioners deposition questions his answers would have been directly or indirectly derived from his prior testimony .....

Amalendu Santra Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1984Cal330

..... according to the respondents out of 75 questions the petitioner had given 39 correct answers 33 incorrect answers and he had also left three questions unanswered by not attempting two questions and ..... after proper evaluation of his merit by granting him full marks for correctly answered questions irrespective of model answers and irrespective of the impugned results of the test 2 while issuing this .....

West Bengal Board of Examination for Admission to Engineering, Medical ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1984Cal52,87CWN1050

..... same he got 3 marks towards the end of the answer script he answered the remaining portion of 4 ka but he was given ..... including the added writ petitioners aggregating about 50 54 that the answer scripts of these unsuccessful candidates were not properly assessed mr arun ..... in any examination may file a writ petition alleging that the answer scripts have not been properly assessed by the examiners or that .....

Jitendra Nath Banerjee and ors. Vs. West Bengal Board of Examination f ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1983Cal275

..... and lawful practice it will be evident if all the relevant documents including answer scripts tabulation sheets selection papers and connected marksheet are produced before this hon ..... fromhigher concentration to lowerconcentration through a semipermeable selectively permeable membrane but the correct answer wouldbe from any standard book as follows if two solutions of different concentrations .....

Kolender Vs. Lawson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... carrying identification could depending on the particular officer be required to answer a series of questions concerning the route that he followed to ..... even conceivable that the mere fact that a suspect refuses to answer questions once detained viewed in the context of the facts that ..... from a suspect during a valid terry stop and the suspect answers who i am is just none of your business surely the .....

Umesh Chand Vinod Kumar and ors. Vs. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and a ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1984All46

..... own interests are not affected and where its members do not answer the description of little indians 17a another exception to the ..... to file separate writ petitions against each mandi samiti 45 our answer to the referred questions is as follows q 1 whether ..... papers be laid before the concerned bench with this opinion and answers i constitution writ petition by association of persons article 226 of .....

Baidyanath Basak and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1986(9)ECC109,1988(17)LC781(Calcutta),1987(30)ELT198(Cal)

..... noticed involves an assumption that the person summoned will be asked questions which he cannot answer truthfully without incriminating himself and that he possesses some documents which will incriminate him ..... this clause guarantees immunity against self incrimination viz no one can be compelled to answer any questions that would expose him to criminal liability or penalty or forfeiture 28 .....

Gannon Norton Metal Diamond Dies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1987)61CTR(Bom)25; [1987]163ITR606(Bom)

..... bench while applying the principles enunciated therein and the question was answered in favour of the assessee 49 similar observations are to ..... decisions it would appear to us to be unnecessary to answer question no 2 although we have indicated our views thereon ..... earlier accordingly the questions referred to us are answered as under question no 1 both the amounts were deductible .....

Baidyanath Basak and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1983CriLJ1542

..... noticed involves an assumption that the person summoned will be asked questions which he cannot answer truthfully without incriminating himself and that he possesses some documents which will incriminate him ..... nation this clause guarantees immunity against self incrirnination viz no one can be compelled to answer any questions that would expose him to criminal liability or penalty or forfeiture 28 .....

Princess Usha Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (1983)35CTR(MP)31; [1983]144ITR808(MP)

..... to the contentions advancedon behalf of the parties we now proceed to answer the question referredby the tribunal to this court question no 1 6 ..... interest in the property of the assessee trust question 2 8 the answer to this question turns on the construction of section 77 of ..... against the revenue 11 question no 4 in view of our aforesaid answers it must be held that the tribunal was not justified in .....