Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anand Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5722 of 2013 Wakil Kumar .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Shailendra Jit For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 30.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) PS case No. 58 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 366A of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from written report that Rabina Kumari, daughter of the informant, was abducted by the petitioner with intention to marry. It is submitted that the victim Rabina Kumari has been examined under section 164 Cr P.C in which she has stated that she is in love with the petitioner and she had left home out of her sweet will. She was neither abducted, nor compelled by the petitioner to stay at any place. Her parents have agreed to solemnize her marriage with the petitioner after 2/3...
Tapuka Alias Bhonj Sawaiyan and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5470 o1. Tapuka @ Bhonj Sawaiyan 2. Motai Sawaiyan @ Modey Sawaiyan ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sristidhar Mahato, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 4/ 31.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 341, 342, 364, 302, 201, 114 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, but charge has been framed under Sections 302, 201, 149 and 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 16 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 75 of 2008, S.T. No. 143 of 2008.. The petitioners are in custody since 18.2.2000 and though there is allegation against them, but it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that other co-accused Moreng Singh Gagrai @ Joday, who was also in custody since 13...
Dinanath Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3018 of 2013 Dinanath Prasad .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Arbind Kumar For the State: Mr. S.K. Srivastava ,APP 2/31.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Dipu Alias Dipak Kachhap and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5513 of 2013 ------- 1. Dipu @ Dipak Kachhap 2. Prakash Kachhap . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioners : : M/s. Pawan Kr. Pathak For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 65 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 1198 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 376/ 511/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R. it appears that there was an attempt to commit rape upon the informant, but the rape could not be committed and she was saved. The petitioners managed to flee away, who have been named by the apprehended co-accused. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, Dipu @ Dipak Kachhap & Prakash Kachhap, are dir...
Bittu Vishwakarma Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2402 of 2013 Bittu Vishwakarma .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kumar For the State: Mr. Tapas Kabiraj,APP 3/31.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Shyamdeo Singh Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4057 of 2012 Shyamdeo Singh .......... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ........ Respondents ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner :Mr. A.K. Das Mr. Arbind Kumar For the State : Mr. Sumir Prasad For the Ranchi University: Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta. ------ I.A. No.5113 o4. 31.07.2013: In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No.4057/2012 in terms of order dated 2.7.2013 passed in W.P.(S) No.4052/2012 (Doodh Nath Tiwary vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.) It has been submitted that the facts and points involved in this matter are exactly identical to the said case of Doodh Nath Tiwary (supra) and this case may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has supported the said contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. The writ petition is being disposed of by...
Anil Singh Alias Anil Kumar Singh and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5517 of 2013 ------- 1. Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh 2. Mandip Singh . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioners : : M/s. Renu Bala For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Manika P.S. Case No. 96 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 661 of 2012, S.T. No. 51 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 364 A, 511, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. There was an attempt to abduct the informant for ransom, but he was saved. The co-accused was apprehended and the petitioners have been named by the apprehended co-accused. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh & Mandip Singh, are directed to be released on bail, ...
Sukh Jiwani Tuti and ors Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4610 of 2013 with I.A. no.5402 o1. Sukh Jiwani Tuti 2. Sabana Perween 3. Achla Kujur . Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioners : Mr.Amit Kr.Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P. VI ----- 2/31.07.2013 In I.A. no.5402 of 2013, the petitioners have prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) NO.4610 of 2013 in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(S) no.2194 of 2013{Ravindra Kumar Ojha & Ors. Vrs. State of Jahrkhand & Ors.}. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the State, submitted that the writ petition itself can be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid case. In the writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction on the respondents to grant Grade-I scale to them from the dates of their respective joining and all consequential benefits i.e. the promotion from Grade-I to Grade-IV, V etc. T...
Pyari Mohan Chatterjee Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.2860 of 2012 Pyari Mohan Chatterjee @ Peyari Mohan Chatterjee.. .Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ...................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.V.K.Tiwari For the State :A.P.P 6.31.7.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on account of certain reason, draft of Rs.10,000/- could not be deposited before the Registrar General of this Court, though requisites for issuance of notice has already been field. However, the draft would be deposited before the Registrar General by 10.8.2013. On deposit of the draft of the aforesaid amount before the Registrar General, notice be issued. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in Complaint Case no.584 of 2006, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Mahesh Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5550 of 2013 ------- Mahesh Yadav . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Rashmi Kumari (A.C.) For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Koderma (S.C./ S.T.) P.S. Case No. 04 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 123 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 323/ 341/ 504/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the S.C. / S.T. (POA) Act. There is allegation against the petitioner to have assaulted the informant and abused him in the name of his caste. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Mahesh Yadav, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »