Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pyari Mohan Chatterjee Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Pyari Mohan Chatterjee vs State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008849

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pyari Mohan Chatterjee

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p.no.2860 of 2012 pyari mohan chatterjee @ peyari mohan chatterjee.. .petitioner versus state of jharkhand and another ...................opposite parties coram: honble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner : mr.v.k.tiwari for the state :a.p.p 6.31.7.13. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on account of certain reason, draft of rs.10,000/- could not be deposited before the registrar general of this court, though requisites for issuance of notice has already been field. however, the draft would be deposited before the registrar general by 10.8.2013. on deposit of the draft of the aforesaid amount before the registrar general, notice be issued. let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in complaint case no.584 of 2006, pending in the court of judicial magistrate, 1st class, bokaro. ( r.r. prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.2860 of 2012 Pyari Mohan Chatterjee @ Peyari Mohan Chatterjee.. .Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ...................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.V.K.Tiwari For the State :A.P.P 6.31.7.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on account of certain reason, draft of Rs.10,000/- could not be deposited before the Registrar General of this Court, though requisites for issuance of notice has already been field. However, the draft would be deposited before the Registrar General by 10.8.2013. On deposit of the draft of the aforesaid amount before the Registrar General, notice be issued. Let this matter be listed on appearance of opposite party no.2. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in Complaint Case no.584 of 2006, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial