Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Onesh Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5778 of 2013 Onesh Mandal .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Gautam Kumar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 31.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Rajmahal PS case No. 129 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 498A/420/494/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner has been prosecuted for committing torture and treating the complainant with cruelty for want of more dowry. It is further contended that he has arranged his second marriage by keeping the complainant in dark and also getting some documents signed by her on false pretext. It is submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.5.2013. The allegation of demand of dowry is false and fabricated. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering matr...
Abid Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5537 of 2013 ------- Abid Ansari . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Asha Jha For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 09 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 83 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 395 / 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to dacoity in a factory and the case was instituted against unknown. The impugned order shows that the petitioner has been made accused in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Abid Ansari, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees T...
Lakshman Ram Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 4497 of 2012 With W.P.S. Nos. 4314, 4340, 4344, 4345, 4349, 4350, 4361, 4365 & 5416 of 2012 ------ 07/31-07-2013 Learned J.C. to A.A.G. prays for further two weeks' time to file an affidavit in compliance with the direction dated 13.05.2013 and also regarding the progress after the recommendation made by the Executive Engineer, Rural Development, Special Division, Hazaribagh dated 12.08.2011. Prayer is allowed. Put up this case on 22.08.2013. It is made clear that if affidavit is not filed by the said extended date, the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, the Superintending Engineer, Rural Development Special Circle, Hazaribagh and Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Hazaribagh, shall remain personally present in court on the next date fixed, for explaining the position. Let a copy of the order be given to learned counsel for the respondents. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Dipak Kumar Ram Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 1878 of 2013 Dipak Kumar Ram ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. S.N. Prasad, Advocate : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. II --- I.A. No. 4755 o05. 31-07-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.S. No. 1878 of 2013 in terms of the order dated 23.01.2013 passed in W.P.S. No. 5125 of 2006 ( Baleshwar Ravidas Vs. State & Ors). It has been submitted that the facts and the points involved in this case are exactly identical to the said case and this case is covered by the order passed in the said case. Learned J.C. to Sr. S.C. II, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has also supported the said submission. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. The writ petition is being disposed of separately. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P....
Subodh Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6528 of 2013 Subodh Kumar Singh ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the C.B.I : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate 04/31.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the C.B.I. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 13(2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court in B.A. No. 9238 of 2012 vide order dated 08.02.2013. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 21.06.2012 i.e. more than one year. It is also contended that one co-accused, namely, Shayam Sundar Prasad, who was remained in custody more than a year has been released on bail in ...
Padma Devi Alias Gudiya Devi Vs. Dhanesh Kumar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tr. Petition (Civil) No. 46 of 2012 --- Padma Devi @ Gudiya Devi ..... Petitioner Versus Dhanesh Kumar ..... Opp. Party --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Adv. For the Opp. Party : - -- 4/31.07.2013 In view of office report dated 10.4.2013 three weeks time is granted for removal of defects. Put up this case on 21.8.2013 In the meantime, ad-interim order passed earlier shall continue, till the next date of listing i.e 21.8.2013. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) Saket/-...
T.R.Verma and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.836 of 2002 T.N.Verma and another............. .......Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr.Nilesh Kumar For the State :A.P.P 39.31.7.13. As prayed for, let this matter be listed after two weeks so that efforts be taken by Mr.Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners to get the dispute which is there in between the petitioners and the opposite party no.2 resolved. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 14.8.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 8.4.2003 shall continue. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Daud Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5784 of 2013 Daud Ansari .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. A.K.Sahani For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 31.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Chowka PS case No. 21 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 3(Ka)/6/7 of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005. It reveals from self statement of Mahendra Ram that the petitioner was apprehended while he was carrying beef weighing 20 kgs, on his bicycle. It is submitted that the petitioner is in jail custody since four months against recovery of said beef weighing 20 kgs. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering nature of offence and the period of detention of the petitioner in custody, he( the petitioner above named) is directed to be release...
Punam Mahato Alias Poonam Mahato and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5781 o1. Punam Mahato @ Poonam Mahato 2. Madhu Mahato .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. A.K.Sahani For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 31.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused in connection with Kandra PS case No. 11 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from complaint that the deceased left home at about 8.00 a.m. in the morning on 28.3.2013 after informing his father (informant) that he is going to Pindrabera. At about 11.50 a.m., informant received a message that the motor cycle of deceased Devendra is lying near Shyen International school, but Devendra is not there. The Informant rushed to the place and found his dead body. Informant has raised suspicion against these petitioners because the deceased was ...
Junesh Marandi and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 5227 of 2013 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 947 o1. Junesh Marandi 2. Himeni Tudu Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellants: Mr. Krishna Shankar, Amicus Curiae For the Respondent: Mr. Hardeo Pd Singh, A.P.P. ------ 07/Dated: July, 31, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This application has been preferred by the appellants-accused, who are original accused No. 3 and 2 respectively, under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence.2) We have heard both sides and perused the record and proceedings of Sessions Case No.87 of 2000.3) Looking to the evidences on record, there is a prima facie case in favour of the appellants-accused. As the criminal appeal is pending, we are not much analyzing the evidences on record, but suffice it will be to say that looking to the evidences of the prosecution witness...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »