Skip to content

Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 18 2013

Shambhu Das Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4898 of 2013 Shambhu Das .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. A.K.Choudhary For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 18.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Madhupur PS case No. 148 of 2012 for the offence registered under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner has been prosecuted in a case of motor cycle theft. It is submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and he has been implicated in this case on the basis of his confession made before police. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. It appears that the learned Sessions Judge has refused prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground of criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Admittedly, nothing incriminating has been recovered f...


Jul 18 2013

Baijnath Pandey Vs. Co Operative

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1813 of 2013 Baijnath Pandey .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. L.K.Singh For the Respondents - Mr. J.C to G.P-II ----- 2/18.7.2013 I. A. No. 4889/2013 In this application, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No. 1813/2013 in terms of the order dated 6.2.2013 passed in W.P.(S) No. 7214/2012 (Chandra Shekhar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.). It has been submitted that the petitioner's case is exactly identical to the case of the petitioner of the said writ petition and this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has not controverted the said contentions. In view of the above, W.P.(S) No. 1813/2013 is being disposed of by separate order. This application stands disposed of. (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J) W.P.(S) No. 1813 of 2013 In ...


Jul 18 2013

Asgar Ali Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2497 of 2012 Asgar Ali . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Dey, Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate ----- 08/18.07.2013: This application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 06.09.2012 passed in Mahuatand P.S. Case No.45 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No.782 of 2012 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after the case was lodged, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre, District Legal Services Authority, Tenughat where the parties got their matrimonial dispute resolved. One of the terms and conditions of the settlements was that the petitioner has to pay Rs.8,000/- every month but whenever the daughters of t...


Jul 18 2013

Sabita Kumari Vs. Human Resource Development

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2422 of 2013 Sabita Kumari .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. R.P.Srivastav For the Respondents - Mr. J.C to G.P-II ----- 2/18.7.2013 I. A. No. 4888/2013 In this application, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No. 2422/2013 in terms of the order passed in W.P.(S) No. 3910/2012 (Prabhaker Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.). It has been submitted that the petitioner's case is exactly identical to the case of the petitioners of the said writ petition and this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned J.C to G.P-II appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection in disposing of this case with similar order, as has been passed in the said case. In view of the above, this writ petition is being disposed of by separate order. This application stands disposed of. (NARE...


Jul 18 2013

Sheo Prasad Singh Munda Vs. Human Resource Development

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2423 of 2013 Sheo Prasad Singh Munda .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. R.P.Srivastav For the Respondents - Mr. J.C to G.P-II ----- 2/18.7.2013 I. A. No. 4890/2013 In this application, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No. 2423/2013 in terms of the order passed in W.P.(S) No. 3910/2012 (Prabhaker Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.). It has been submitted that the petitioner's case is exactly identical to the case of the petitioners of the said writ petition and this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned J.C to G.P-II appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection in disposing of this case with similar order, as has been passed in the said case. In view of the above, this writ petition is being disposed of by separate order. This application stands disposed...


Jul 18 2013

Sudhir Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.4821of2013 SudhirKumarSinha Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.DilipKr.Prasad,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 03/18.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals from the F.I.R. that petitioner has been running a nursing training school in the name of Budha A.N.M. Nursing Training School, Ormanjhi.ItisallegedthatIndianNursingCouncilhasnotgivenanyaffiliation tothesaidtrainingschoolbutbycreatingaforgedletteritwasshownthatthe said training school has duly been authorised. The petitioner has taken admissionofcandidatesandrealisedfeesfromthembuttheywerenotprovided anycertificate,evenaftercompletionoftraining. ItissubmittedthatpetitionerhassurrenderedbeforetheCourtbelowon 09.04.2013andsincethenheisincustody.Itisapparentfromthecasediary thatthepetitionerhasmadecorrespondencewiththeStateGovernmenttorun thesaidnursingtrainingschool.Hehasnotcreatedanyforgeddocument. Learnedcoun...


Jul 18 2013

Tarsious Topno Alias Suiya Munda Alias Sijiyu Vs. the State of Jharkha ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5306 of 2013 Tarsious Topno @ Suiya Munda @ Sijiyu...... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/18.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement of the co-accused. It is also submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is also contended that the petitioner is in custody from 27.08.2012 i.e. nearly 11 months. Learned counsel for the State has opposed but he has not disputed the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He has further sub...


Jul 18 2013

Manoj Das Alias Manoj Kr Srivastava Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jul-18-2013

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.RevisionNo.552of2012 ManojDas@ManojKumarSrivastava .... .... .Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.RinkiDevi .... .... ....Opp.Parties CORAM:HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.DeveshKrishna,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. FortheO.P.No.2 :Mr.RajeshKumarSingh,Advocate 16/18.07.2013 Asalastindulgencegiventotheparties,putupthiscase on24thJuly,2013at1.40p.m.inChamberunderthesameheading. Till then, interim order dated 26th February, 2013 shall continue. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial