Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhuneshwar Mahto Alias Dablu Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5484 of 2013 ------- Bhuneshwar Mahto @ Dablu Mahto . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Atanu Banerjee For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No. 19 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 120 of 2011, for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 427, 435 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 10 / 13 of the U.A.P. Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. From the F.I.R. it appears that one J.C.B. was burnt by the members of the extremists group and the driver has stated that the petitioner was one amongst the culprits. There is no overt act alleged by the driver against this petitioner. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingl...
Mallu Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2243 of 2013 Mallu Yadav .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.S. Dayal For the State: Mr. Shekhar Sinha ,APP 3/31.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Dukha Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 1008 of 2010 Dukha Mandal ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Appellant : Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhayay, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. I.A. No. 5224 o07. 31.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that prayer for bail of the appellant was earlier rejected by this Court. It is also submitted that the appellant is in custody from 07.08.2008, thus he has served nearly five years ( few days less) half of the sentence awarded to him. Learned counsel for the State has opposed but he has not disputed the period of custody of the appellant. Considering the fact that the appellant has practically served half of the sentence awarded to him during the pendency of the appeal, the appellant, above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of ...
Sukhwa Lomga Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5521 of 2013 ------- Sukhwa Lomga @ Sukuwa Lomga . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. K.P.Choudhary For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Goilkera P.S. Case No.16 of 2009, corresponding to G.R No.140 of 2009, S.T. No. 93 of 2012 / 123 of 2011, for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 302, 120(B), 398, 427 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, Section 13 of the U.A.P. Act and Section 3 & 4 of the Explosive Substance Act. Three persons belonging to extremists group were apprehended by the police and while they were being taken away, there was a land mine explosion followed by encounter between the police party and the extre...
Murli Marandi and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No.5226 of 2013 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 869 o1. Murli Marandi 2. Som Tudu 3. Sukal Tudu Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellants: None For the Respondent: Mr. Sekhar Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 04/Dated: July, 31, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This matter has been placed before this Court for the reason that a letter has been written from jail by the appellants which has been referred through the Superintendent, Central Jail, Dumka to this Court vide his forwarding letter dated 10th July, 2013. This letter has been given this I.A. Number and there is a prayer for suspension of sentence, or, final hearing of the Criminal Appeal.2) When the matter is called out, no body appears for the appellants. Counsel for the State is present.3) Counsel for the State-A.P.P. submitted that this appellant is in jail since 2003 and their pra...
Shyam Lal Mahto and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2114 o1. Shyam Lal Mahto 2. Yugal Vishwakarma .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Arbind Kumar For the State: Mr. S.K. Srivastava ,APP 3/31.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Sonu Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5515 of 2013 ------- Sonu Kumar Singh . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Md. Shahid Anshari For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.98 of 2012, corresponding to G.R No.4000 of 2012, S.T. No. 854 of 2012, for the offence under Sections 395 / 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to road dacoity and soon after the occurrence the petitioner was apprehended after a chase and was also identified by the victims. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner Sonu Kumar Singh, is hereby rejected. (H.C.Mishra, J.) D.S....
Rina Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3309 o1. Rina Devi 2. Manish Paswan .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay For the State: Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ,APP 2/31.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Jai Kishan Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.353 of 2012 Jai Kishan .............................................. .Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ......Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Ms. Nitu Sinha 2/ 31.7.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Dhirjan Sahu Alias Dhrijan Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2650 of 2013 Dhirjan Sahu @ Dhrijan Sahu ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash For the State : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, A.P.P. ........ 4/31.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Dhirjan Sahu @ Dhrijan Sahu is moved by Sri Mohit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Abhishek Kumar, learned Additional PP. for the State. Sri Abhishek Kumar, learned Additional PP for the State submits that this case is under Section 3/4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Thus, as per Section 18 of the said Act, this application is not maintainable. Sri Mohit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of first information report, no offence under Section of the 3/4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) A...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »