Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tripurari Pathak and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S).No.6146of2011 with I.A.No.5178of2013 TripurariPathak&Ors. .Petitioners. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioners : Mr.ShekharPrasadSinha,Advocate FortheState : J.C.toAAG 05/30.07.2013: InI.A.No.5178of2013thepetitionershaveprayedforfixing earlydateofhearingofthewritpetitionorforitsfinaldisposal. Thepetitionershavefiledthewritpetitionforadirectionon the respondents to take a decision on the recommendation madebytheVillageEducationCommitteeandBlockEducation Committee for appointment of the petitioners on the post of ParaTeacher. It has been submitted that the recommendation was made to the District Superintendent of EducationcumDistrict ProgrammeOfficer,Plamauasfarbackasintheyear2011,but noorderhasbeenpassedtilldateandthematterisstillpending beforehim.Learnedcounselsubmittedthatthepetitionersare unemployedyouthandtheirfateishanginginbalancedueto pendency of the matter before the Di...
imran Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1360 of 2013 Imran Khan .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan Mr. Asif Khan For the State: Mr. S.K. Dubey,APP 3/30.07.2013: This application has been filed for modification of order dated 28.09.2012 passed in B.A. No. 6945 of 2012 ( Annexure-1). It appears that by the said order, petitioner has been granted regular bail subject to the condition that petitioner shall produce a certificate issued by a Nationalized Bank to show that he has fixed deposited Rs. 50,000/- in the name of his son for 10 years. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody and informant who is ex-wife of petitioner, has not cooperated and because of that petitioner could not furnish the fixed deposit certificate and therefore he is still in custody. Accordingly, it is submitted that the petitioner may be enlarged on provisional bail so...
Birendra Saw Alias Birendra Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6026 of 2013 Birendra Saw @ Birendra Sao ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 04/30.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 21/22 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court in B.A. No. 876 of 2013 vide order dated 07.02.2013. It is also submitted that according to allegation made in the F.I.R. brown sugar and heroine have been recovered from the possession of Bhupendra Singh and Jitendra Saw and both of them have already been granted bail by another Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 3698 of 2013 vide order dated 07.05....
Shane Ali Alias Shaney Ali Alias Shaney Ali Khan Vs. the State of Jhar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5637 of 2013 Shane Ali @ Shaney Ali @ Shaney Ali Khan .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 05/30.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court in B.A. No. 9451 of 2012 vide order dated 17.01.2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the other co-accused, namely, Aslam Khan @ Raja has already been released on bail by another Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 4356 of 1999(R) vide order dated 07.07.1999. To support his contention, the aforesaid order has been annexed as Annexure-2 in this application. ...
Raja Hansda and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI I.A. No. 3832 of 2013 In Cr. (Jail) Appeal (DB)No. 848 o1. Raja Hansda 2. Nandan Hansda ....... Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand ....... Respondent ............. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ....... For the Appellants :Mr. Rahul Saboo, Amicus curie For the State :Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P ............ 08/Dated:30. h July, 2013 Oral Order: Per D.N. Patel. J.: I.A. No. 3832 o1. We have heard the counsels for both the sides for suspension of sentence under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. These applicants are original appellants in criminal appeal. They have been punished for life imprisonment for causing murder of the deceased for the offence punishable under Section 302 to be read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.3. This Court has received the record and proceedings of Sessions Trial No.30 of 2001. We have perused the same and herd the counsel for the sides at length.4. Looking...
Shishir Kumar Choudhary Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C)No. 3081 of 2013 Shishir Kumar Choudhary .... .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : M/s. Rita Kumari, Sarfaraz Akhtar, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikash Kishore Prasad, Adv. - -- 6/30.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State Government. Perused the materials placed on record. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State Government requested for four weeks' time to file counter affidavit in the case. Request is granted. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the present case in the mean time, status quo as on today shall be maintained by the parties with regard to the suit property. The petitioner is at liberty to file application for site inspection/inventory before the Sub-divisional Officer, Godda and upon receipt of such application the Sub-divisional...
Manish Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
[IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1437 of 2012 ----- Manish Kumar .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Priyanka Deo .. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM : HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Dilip Kumar Karmakar , Advocate. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. D. Chandra Ghosh., Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- C.A.V. ON:26. 06.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 07/2013 ----- Jaya Roy,J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner the learned counsel for the Opposite party no.2.2. The petitioner has filed this application for modification of the order dated 31.01.2012 passed in A.B.A. No. 2608 of 2011 whereby this Court has directed the petitioner to deposit an Account Payee Demand Draft amounting to Rs.7 Lakhs (Rupees Seven Lakhs) in the name of the complainant of this case in the Court below and return all the articles come under 'Stree-dhan' to the complainant, and surrender before the court below within the aforesaid period. ...
Rahul Kumar Singh Alias Rahul Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4281 of 2013 ------- Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Singh . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Rita Kumari For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 4/ 30.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 88 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 382 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act. From the F.I.R. it appears that the petitioner was apprehended on 24.3.2013 and from the house of the petitioner one country made rifle one fire arm like carbine and two cartridges were recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Singh, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(...
Dr Shashi Bhushan Prakash Mehta Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.23 of 2013 Dr.Shashi Bhushan Prakash Mehta.....Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand ......................... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State : A.P.P 7.30.7.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this application was filed for quashing of the order taking cognizance but subsequently, when the charge was framed, the order framing charge was challenged before this Court as there was no sufficient material to frame charge against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In this regard it was submitted that initially a case was lodged that one Md.Anish had killed Suchitra Mishra for assaulting her but the police during investigation turned the entire story of the prosecution and put accusation against the petitioner only on the basis of confessional statement said to have been made by this pe...
Mantosh Mahto Vs. M/S Damodar Valley Corporation
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2986 of 2012 --- Mantosh Mahto --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus M/s Damodar Valley Corporation through its Chairman & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents:M/sT.Kabiraj,Ananda Sen,A.K. Verma, Advocates --- 07/ 30.07.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner is seeking a direction upon the respondents, particularly respondent no. 3-The General Manager, Chasnala Colliery, Indian Iron and Steel Company, Sindri, Dhanbad to provide employment to the petitioner in lieu of acquisition of his land measuring 25 decimal situate at Plot Nos. 245, 281, 604, 120 and 121 of Khata No. 23, Mouza Hat Kaudra in the district of Dhanbad.3. From the submission of the parties as also the averments made in the writ application itself, it appears that the acquisition proceedings had started vide L.A. Case No. 10/1977-78 and thereafter...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »