Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dembo Tudu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 2185 of 2011 and I.A. No. 3351 of 2013 in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1207 of 2005 Dembo Tudu ...... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ...... Respondent -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY -------- For the appellant: Mr. Dilip Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State: A.P.P. -------- st Order No. 08: Dated 31 July, 2013 Per D.N.Patel, J.1. Both the interlocutory applications bearing I.A. No. 2185 of 2011 and I.A. No. 3351 of 2013 have preferred under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence, awarded to this applicant (original accused) in Sessions Case No. 297 of 2004/ 143 of 2004.2. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the evidence on record, there is a prima facie case against this applicant. As the Criminal Appeal is pending, we are not much analyzing the evidence on record, but, suffice it to say that the depositions of the prosecution witn...
Dip Narayan Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5526 of 2013 ------- Dip Narayan Das . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Purnendu Kr. Jha For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 30 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 307 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 406, 419, 420, 120(B), 468/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R. it appears that the other co-accused persons had taken some money from the informant on the pretext of getting job and of getting some loan. It is alleged that on the date of occurrence the petitioner came to the informant and impersonated himself as a Bank Manager. He was apprehended and produced before the police. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitione...
Rama Mahto Alias Ram Kumar Sinha and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6708 o1. Rama Mahto @ Ram Kumar Sinha @ Ram Kumar Mahto 2. Ajay Keshari @ Ajay Kumar Keshri ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 3/ 31.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 30(ii) of the Coal Mines Act and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 321 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 4646 of 2012. The petitioners are alleged to be involved in illegal mining and transaction of coal. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Rama Mahto @ Ram Kumar Sinha @ Ram Kumar Mahto and Ajay Keshari @ Ajay Kumar Keshri , on bail. Accordingly, the petitione...
Mukhtar Ansari Alias Mukhtar HussaIn Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2251 of 2013. ----- Mukhtar Ansari @ Mukhtar Hussain Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Sanjeev Thakur For the State : Sri G.S.Prasad, A.P.P. ----- 03/31.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Mukhtar Ansari @ Mukhtar Hussain is moved by Sri Sanjeev Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri G.S.Prasad, Addl.P.P. for the State. F.I.R. and case diary reveals that petitioner implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14/08/2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction ...
Ranjit Sardar Alias Petu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5538 of 2013 ------- Ranjit Sardar @ Petu Sardar . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Tapas Roy For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur (R.I.T.) P.S. Case No. 169 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 566 of 2011, for the offence under Sections 302/ 34/ 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The case relates to the murder of the father of the informant and the petitioner was seen fleeing away from the room where the deceased was found in an injured condition and subsequently he died. It also appears that from the possession of the petitioner, one fired cartridge and pistol had been recovered and the petitioner had confessed his guilt stating that with t...
Baleshwar Prasad Singh Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4071 of 2012 Baleshwar Prasad Singh .......... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ........ Respondents ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner :Mr. A.K. Das Mr. Arbind Kumar For the State : Mr. R. Mukhopadhyay For the Ranchi University: Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta. ------ I.A. No.5111 o3. 31.07.2013: In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No.4071/2012 in terms of order dated 2.7.2013 passed in W.P.(S) No.4052/2012 (Doodh Nath Tiwary vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.) It has been submitted that the facts and points involved in this matter are exactly identical to the said case of Doodh Nath Tiwary (supra) and this case may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has supported the said contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. The writ petition is being dis...
Md Lukman Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5528 of 2013 ------- Md. Lukman . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Ranjan Kumar Singh For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 56 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 535 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307, 379/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation against the petitioner and the other co-accused to have assaulted and injured the informant and his father. The impugned order shows that there is land dispute between the parties and there is case and counter-case between the parties for the same occurrence. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Md. Lukman, is direc...
Mrs Fulaso Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Mahto
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI FirstAppealNo.105of2012 With I.A.No.1834of2012 Mrs.PhulasoDevi .... .... .... Appellant Versus VijayKumarMahto .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant :Mr.NehruMahto,Advocate FortheRespondents : st OrderNo.05 Dated,31 July,2013 Heard learned counsel for the appellant on the applicationforcondonationofdelaybeingI.A.No.1834of2012. In view of the facts stated in the application, I.A. No.1834of2012isallowedandthedelayiscondoned. ListthiscaseforAdmissionaftertwoweeks. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
Surendra Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5535 of 2013 ------- Surendra Sahu . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Pandey Neeraj Rai For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 32 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 2066 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There is allegation against the petitioner to have subjected his wife to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Surendra Sahu, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to ...
Dila Bauri and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.5140of2013 In Cr.Appeal(DB)No.750of2004 DilaBauriandothers Appellants Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellants : Mr.A.N.Deo,Advocate FortheRespondent : Mr.PankajKumar,A.P.P. 14/Dated:31 st July,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that appellant no. 5, namely,MahendraSinghexpiredon28thJanuary,2012.Deathcertificateisalso annexed at Annexure1 to the interlocutory application and, therefore, it is submittedthatthisappealforappellantno.5hasbeenabatedbecauseofdeath ofappellantno.5.2. LearnedcounselfortheStateisseekingtimetofileanaffidavitofthe SuperintendentofPolice,DistrictDhanbad.3. Thematterisadjournedtobelistedon19thAugust,2013.4. Thisappealisnottobetreatedaspartheard. (D.N.Patel,J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Ajay/...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »