Jharkhand Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raju Chandrabanshi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5671 of 2011 ------Raju Chandrabanshi Petitioner -VersusThe State of Jharkhand CORAM : ...... Opposite Party -----HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr.Arbind Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr.M.B.Lal, A.P.P. -----5/ 10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Ranka P.S case no.61 of 2010 corresponding to G.R No. 852 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 364, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation against the petitioner and others to have abducted the victim for ransom. From the case diary, it appears that there are sufficient materials against the petitioner. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner Raju Chandrabanshi is hereby rejected.(H.C.Mishra, J.)B.S/...
Ranjit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6771 of 2011 Ranjit Kumar Gupta Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA :Mr. R. M. Singh :A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State----4/10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 304B of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with C 1 Case No. 640 of 2010. Though, there is allegation against the petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, but from the impugned order, it appears that earlier a police case was instituted and after investigation the Police had submitted the final form assigning the reason to be mistake of facts. Subsequently, on the basis of complaint petition the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Ranjit Kumar Gupta is ...
Shambhu Ganjhu @ Shambu Ganjhu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6789 of 2011 ------Shambhu Ganjhu @ Shambu Ganjhu .. -VersusThe State of Jharkhand CORAM : ...... Opposite Party -----HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr.D.K.Chakraverty, Advocate For the State : Mr.P.K.Sahay, A.P.P. -----2/ 10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Khelari P.S case no.38 of 2005 corresponding to G.R No.1620 of 2005, S.T No.269 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to the dacoity, in which, wrist watches and other articles were taken away by the culprits. The case was instituted against unknown. From the impugned order, it appears that two wrist watch were recovered from the house of the petitioner which were identified by the witnesses in T.I.Parade. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer fo...
Dharmendra Singh @ Dharmendra Kumar Singh and ors Vs. State of Jharkha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2204 of 2011 -----...... ... Petitioners Opp. Party1. Anil Jha 2. Sanjay Paswan @ Sanjay Kumar Paswan Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: -----....HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY -----For the Petitioners : Mr. Dilip Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----06 /10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are accused in connection with Excise Case No.10 of 2011 corresponding to T.R. Case No.1497 of 2011 registered under Sections 47(A)/55/18 of the Excise Act, pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat. It reveals that 512 liters of country-made liquor and 81.870 liters of foreign liquor have been recovered from the house of Lal Bahadur Das whereas these petitioners managed to escape. It is submitted that nothing incriminating was recovered from the possession of these petitioners and they have no concern with the recovery of liquor, as alleged. Learned counsel for...
Shiv Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6749 of 2011 Shiv Kumar Singh Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. R.M. Singh A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 2/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under SectionsProsecution. 420/467/468/471/477/379/411/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(ii) of the Coal Mines and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, in connection with Mandu P.S. Case no.31 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 467 of 2011. The petitioner is the owner-cum-driver of the truck, which is alleged to be involved in transporting coal under fake registration number. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Shiv Kumar Singh is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) wi...
Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju Singh and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7276 of 2011 1. Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju Singh 2. Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Dharmendra Singh.....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA :Mr. Dilip Kumar Jaiswal :A. P.P.For the Petitioners For the State----2/10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 420, 468, 472, 473, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Nawadih P.S. Case No. 36 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 416 of 2011. One truck loaded with materials intended for packing spurious liquor as foreign liquor was recovered by the police and two persons were apprehended. The apprehended persons disclosed the names the petitioners. The petitioners were not apprehended at the spot. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners ...
Anuj Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.6597 of 2010 Anuj Kumar Singh ................................... VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others...................Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD PetitionerFor the Petitioners : Mr. S.K.Tiwary For the State : J.C to S.C.I 5/ 10.10.11. Let this matter be listed on 16.11.2011 awaiting service report. Meanwhile, petitioner would be at liberty to take steps for service of notice under registered cover with A/D upon respondent no.4,for which requisites must be filed by 14.10.2011.(R.R.Prasad, J.)ND/...
Shahid Khan @ Sahid Khan @ Mukhiya Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6254 of 2011 ------Shahid Khan @ Sahid Khan @ Mukhiya Petitioner -Versus...... Opposite Party -----CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr.D.K.Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Mr.T.N.Verma, A.P.P. -----3/ 10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Kasmar P.S case no.60 of 2010 corresponding to G.R No.1112 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 302, 120 'B', 201 of the Indian Penal Code. One dead body of an unknown person was recovered and the case was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner accordingly prays for bail. From the impugned order, it is apparent that the petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement. In t...
Subodh Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5933 of 2011 ------Subodh Kumar Singh Petitioner -Versus...... Opposite Party -----CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr.Indrajit Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr.Amitabh, A.P.P. -----3/ 10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Koderma, Telaiya P.S case no.204 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No. 411 of 2011 for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Though there is direct allegation against the petitioner to have assaulted the deceased, who is his own brother, but from the case diary, it appears that the occurrence had taken place in a Saloon and the barber who was present at the place of occurrence , has stated that the petitioner was in his saloon when the deceased came and he assaulted the petitioner. Thereafter, in course of altercation, petitioner assaulted the deceased with the scissors which was k...
Lalit Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1395 of 2007 Lalit Kumar Agrawal ... ....PetitionerVs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: For the State: 4/10.10.2011: Mr. Rajan Raj APPAfter some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner Permission accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.seeks permission to withdraw this application at this stage.( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »