Jharkhand Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naresh Baidya (Jain) and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHICr.M.P.No. 1636 of 2007 ----1. Naresh Bdidhya (Jain) 2.Kishor Baidhya @ K.K.Jain . ... ..... . Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr....,. ...Petitioners Opp.Party.-----CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Ananda Sen For the State : A.P.P. -----07/10.10.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw this application with a liberty to raise all the points before the appropriate forum. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.( Prashant Kumar,J.)Raman/...
Awadh Vishwakarma @ Awadh Bishwakarma @ Chenga Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal ( DB) No. 386 of 2011 Awadh Vishwakarma @ Awadh Bishwakarma @ Chenga Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent -------Coram: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. MERATHIA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------For the Appellant : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr.Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ravi Prakash, APP -------Order No. 4 Dated the 10th October, 2011 Heard the parties on the prayer for bail. It is submitted that P.W-2-Informant did not see the actual occurrence and P.W--5 is merely a chance witness and according to paragraph 13 of P.W-8-I.O., the statement of P.W-2-Rajendra Kumar Singh was dictated by him. On the other hand, Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the State, opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that similar grounds were taken when the prayer for bail of co-convict-Babua Pandey was rejected on 12.07.2011 vide Cr. Appeal ( DB) No. 363 of 2011 and that if the evidence of P.W-8-I.O. is read as a whole along with the evidence of P....
Nand Lal Rana Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6778 of 2011 Nand Lal Rana ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr. M.K.Sah, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nitu Sinha, A.P.P.------THE2/ 10.10.2011Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for The petitioner has been made accused for the offence underthe Prosecution. Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Markacho P.S. Case No. 78 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 689 of 2010. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have committed rape upon the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the witnesses who have been examined in course of trial, have turned hostile. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Nand Lal Rana, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. H...
Shakuntla Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.1517of2008 ShakuntlaDevi ... Petitioner VersusTheStateofJharkhand&others...; Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: M/sDilipKr.Prasad,A.K.Pathak,Advocates FortheState: Mr.AjitKumar,AAG. th 06:Dated10October,2011 1. 2. Rule. CounselfortherespondentswaivesnoticeofRule.(D.N.Patel,J.)VK...
Md.Salim Ansari and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6783 of 2011 1. Md. Salim @ Md. Salim Ansari 2. Arjun Singh ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioners : Mr. B.M.Tripathy, Sr. Advocate & Mr. N.K.Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S.Sahay, A.P.P.------THE2/ 10.10.2011Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for The petitioners have been made accused for the offence underthe Prosecution. Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 30(ii) of the Coal Mines Act and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 86 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 2025 of 2011. Trucks loaded with illegally mined coal were apprehended by the police and the petitioners are the driver and cleaner of one of the trucks. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Md. Salim @ Md. Salim Ansari and Arjun Singh, on bail. Accordingly, th...
Gopal Krishna Hazra and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1425 of 2007 Gopal Krishna Hazra & Anr ... ....PetitionersVs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: For the State: 5/10.10.2011: Mr. Ananda Sen Mr. S.N. Rajgarhia, APPAfter some argument, learned counsel for the petitionerseeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the points taken in this application at the appropriate stage before the trial court. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is permitted to be withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Smt. Prabha Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 85 of 2004 Smt. Prabha Sharma v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors CORAM: ... ....Petitioner..Opposite PartiesHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: For the State: M/s. Karnpriya Chy APP18/10.10.2011:Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to takefresh steps for issuance of notice upon O.P. No. 2 on his present and correct address through registered post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within a week, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. In the mean time, interim order dated 02.04.2004 shall continue.( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Bablu Yadav @ Bablu Kumar Yadav and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal ( DB) No. 792 of 2006 Bablu Yadav @ Bablu Kumar Yadav @ Anr. Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent -------Coram: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. MERATHIA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : APP -------Order No. 4 Dated the 10th October, 2011 I.A. No. 910/2011 This I.A. has been filed for bail on behalf of appellant no. 2 but it appears from the order sheet that no one appeared to press this I.A. on 8.8.2011, 24.8.2011 and on 7.9.2011. In the circumstances, I.A. No. 910 of 2011 stands rejected for non prosecution. ..Appellants( R.K. Merathia, J) ( P.P. Bhatt, J)Rakesh/...
Bholeshwar Prasad Narayan Sinh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.6284of2008 BholeshwarPrasadNarayanSinha... Petitioner VersusTheStateofJharkhand&others...; Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:M/sSujitNarayanPrasad,B.Burman FortheJharkhandState:J.C.toG.PII FortheBiharState:Mr.S.P .Roy FortheA.G.:Mr.S.Srivastava th 07:Dated10October,2011 1. Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writpetitionreservinglibertywiththepetitionertofileafreshpetitionbefore appropriateCourtorForum. 2. 3. 4. Permission,assoughtfor,isgranted. Thiswritpetitionisdisposedofaswithdrawnreservinglibertywith Interimrelief,ifany,standsvacated.thepetitionertofileafreshpetitionbeforeappropriateCourtorForum.(D.N.Patel,J.)VK...
Sushanto Kundu @ Sushanto Tundu @ Susanta Kr. Kundu Vs. State of Jhark ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2864 of 2011 -----Sushanto Kundu @ Sushanto Tundu @ Susanta Kr. Kundu ...... Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Jitendra Kr. Dubey CORAM: .... ... .... ...Petitioner------Opp. PartiesHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pankaj, Advocate For the Opp. Party : A.P.P. ----02 /10.10.2011 As prayed, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.(D.N. Upadhyay, J.)NKC...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »