Jharkhand Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Meena Kumari Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHIMeena KumariCr.M.P.No. 1671 of 2007 ----. ... .... ...Petitioner Respondents. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors....,.-----CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR -----For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Chaturvedi For the State : A.P.P. -----07/10.10.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.( Prashant Kumar,J.)Raman/...
Jiten Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6801 of 2011 Jiten Mandal Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. Gautam Kumar A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 2/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under SectionsProsecution. 353/307/323/342/394 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case no.31 of 1999, corresponding to G.R. No.155 of 1999, S.T. No. 191 of 2006. It appears that the petitioner was on bail and while the petitioner was on bail, the case was committed to the court of Session. It also appears from the impugned order that the petitioner did not appear in the court and ultimately permanent warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner on 24.7.2010, in execution of which the petitioner was arrested. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner ...
Kuleshwar Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6600 of 2011 Kuleshwar Mahto Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 4/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 376 of theProsecution. Indian Penal Code, in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case no.48 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.1115 of 2011, S.T. No.353 of 2011. From the FIR, it appears that marriage between the informant and the petitioner was settled and thereafter the petitioner was in visiting terms with the informant and he also established sexual relation with her, but subsequently the petitioner refused to marry her. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is a compromise between the parties and the petitioner is ready to marry the informant. Learned counsel for the informa...
Noor Mohmad and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2187 of 2011 -----Noor Mohammad & Others ... Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rama Rana CORAM: .... ... ........Petitioners------.Opp. PartiesHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY -----For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----05 /10.10.2011 Petitioners are directed to make complainant as Opposite Party No.2. Issue notice to newly added O.P. No.2 through registered cover with A/D as well as through ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week. List the case after return of the notice.(D.N. Upadhyay, J)NKC...
Manoj Kumar Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2640 of 2011 Manoj Kumar PrasadVersus.. ...Petitioner Opposite PartyState of Jharkhand Coram :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAYFor the petitioner (s): Mr. A. SenFor the Opposite Party : Addl.P.P.10.10.2011Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by thecounsel for the State. petitioner in connection with Adityapur PS case No. 214/2010 registered under sections 135/138 of the Electricity Act. for the offenceIt is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner was found consuming electricity in his premises by diverting the connection from the Meter thereby causing loss to the tune of rupees four thousand to the Jharkhand State Electricity Board. It is submitted that the petitioner has deposited the aforesaid loss amount on 28.7.2010 and he has not caused any loss to the Electricity Board and the allegation levelled against him is false. Learned counsel for the State h...
Duryodhan Pd.Mahato @ Mithilesh Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal ( DB) No. 335 of 2011 Duryodhan Prasad Mahto @ Mithilesh Singh ..Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent -------Coram: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. MERATHIA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------For the Appellant : Mr. Nilendu Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : APP -------Order No. 4 Dated the 10th October, 2011 I.A. No. 756/2011 Heard. On being satisfied with the grounds, the delay of 34 days in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 756/2011 is disposed of.( R.K. Merathia, J) ( P.P. Bhatt, J)Rakesh/...
Vishwanath Das and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6817 of 2011 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Vishwanath Das Mahendra Das Rampravesh Das Ambika @ Amiriku Das @ Amiraku Das Shivashankar Das ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA :Mr. Arbind Kr. Jha :A. P.P.For the Petitioners For the State----2/10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 363, 366, 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 2011, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 767 of 2011. There is allegation against the petitioners to have attempted to kidnap the daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage but it appears that they were apprehended by the villagers on the spot and the girl could not be taken away. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners Vishwanath Das, Mahendra Das, R...
Ram Ayodhaya Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ContemptCase(Civil)No.823of2009 RamAyodhaya ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Opp.Parties Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers ... CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: Mr.SatishKumarKeshri FortheOpp.Parties: Sr.S.C.I&Mr.S.Srivastava; 09/Dated:10October,2011 th 1) CounselfortherespondentNo.1submittedthatallthenecessary papersforfixingthepensionaswellasgratuityhavebeensentto theAccountantGeneralOffice,Ranchi. 2) CounselfortherespondentNos.6&8submittedthatthepapers received from the Government are not complete and still some papers are required to be sent for which letter dated 28th September,2011hasbeenwrittentotheJointSecretary,Human ResourcesDevelopmentDepartment,Ranchi. 3) CounselfortheStatesubmittedthatthisletterwillberepliedand thenecessarypaperswillbesentonorbefore14thOctober,2011. 4) In view of the aforesaid submissions, matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 21st October, 2011 under the heading 'For Final Disposal'.Manoj/cp.0(D.N.Pa...
Anil Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.2825 of 2011 Anil Kumar .................................. .............. Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others...................Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASADFor the Petitioner : Mr.Umesh Kumar Choubey For the State : J.C to G.P.III 3/ 10.10.11. I.A.No.2285 of 2011 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier an order passed on 13.5.2011 as contained in Annexure 6A was sought tobe quashed but subsequently, that letter was withdrawn. Thereafter another order has been passed on 21.7.2011 as contained in Annexure 8 to the Interlocutory Application bearing no. 2285 of 2011 whereby the petitioner has been removed from the post of In-charge, Headmaster and in his place another person has been appointed and therefore, an Interlocutory application has been filed wherein prayer has been made to allow the petitioner to incorporate the prayer for quashing of the order as contained in said lett...
Kaum Mian Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6446 of 2011 Kaum Mian @ Ansari Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA :Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo :A. P.P. : Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State For the Informant----3/10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution and also learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code and added Sections 302, 201/34 IPC, in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 23 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 91 of 2011. There is allegation against the petitioner and the other co-accused to have called the deceased from his house and, subsequently, the dead body of the deceased was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and there is no other material against the petitioner except tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »