Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ranjit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand

Ranjit Kumar Gupta vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Oct 10, 2011
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/921796

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

C-101, Vasundhara Apartments, Dwarka, New Delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. Regarding property at L-4, Connaught Place, New Delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. Since the defendant is willin...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjit Kumar Gupta

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 6771 of 2011 ranjit kumar gupta versus the state of jharkhand coram: . opposite party honble mr. justice h.c. mishra :mr. r. m. singh :a. p.p. ..... petitionerfor the petitioner for the state----4/10.10.2011 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. petitioner has been made accused for the offence under sections 304b of the indian penal code, in connection with c 1 case no. 640 of 2010. though, there is allegation against the petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, but from the impugned order, it appears that earlier a police case was instituted and after investigation the police had submitted the final form assigning the reason to be mistake of facts. subsequently, on the basis of complaint petition the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner ranjit kumar gupta is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, jamshedpur in connection with c 1 case no. 640 of 2010.(h. c. mishra, j)umesh/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6771 of 2011 Ranjit Kumar Gupta Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA :Mr. R. M. Singh :A. P.P. ..... Petitioner

For the Petitioner For the State

----4/10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 304B of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with C 1 Case No. 640 of 2010. Though, there is allegation against the petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, but from the impugned order, it appears that earlier a police case was instituted and after investigation the Police had submitted the final form assigning the reason to be mistake of facts. Subsequently, on the basis of complaint petition the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Ranjit Kumar Gupta is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with C 1 Case No. 640 of 2010.

(H. C. Mishra, J)

Umesh/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial