Jharkhand Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandrika Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 674 of 2008 Chandrika Singh ... ....PetitionerVs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: For the State: 3/10.10.2011: Mr. Krishna Murari APPLearned counsel for the petitioner is directed to takefresh steps for issuance of notice upon O.P. No. 2 on this present and correct address through registered post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within a week, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Returned copy, if available, may be used. In the mean time, interim order dated 3.11.2010 shall continue.( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Abraham Rowna Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 312 of 2008 Rookmania Devi... ...... ... ... ..... Petitioner RespondentsVersus Ideal Financing Industries & Anr. ..... ------CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----For the Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Ojha For the Respondent : Mr. Order No. 03 -----Dated 10th October, 2011The Office objection is that the petitioner has not submitted supplementary affidavit stating therein that he has not move restoration application earlier. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time. One week time is granted for filing supplementary affidavit. (Prakash Tatia, C J) (Jaya Roy, J)Alankar/Sudhir/-IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cv.) No. 89 of 2011 Abraham Rowna... ...... ... ... ..... Petitioner RespondentsVersus The Union of India & Ors ..... ------CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Sinha For the Respondent : M/s Faizur Rahman, C.G.C -----Dated 10t...
Prabhu Sahay Kander Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6809 of 2011 Prabhu Sahay Kander Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 2/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 414 ofProsecution. the Indian Penal Code under Section 25(1-B) (a) (I-AA) /26/ 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 (1)(11) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, in connection with Khunti P.S. Case no.11 of 2009, corresponding to G.R. No.33 of 2009. From the possession of the petitioner, one loaded country made rifle and three cartridges were recovered. The bail application of this petitioner was earlier rejected by order dated 28.5.2009 in B.A. No. 3174 of 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner remained in custody for sufficiently long period and accordingly prayed for bail....
Jainath Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6571 of 2011 Jainath Yadav Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. Md. Faruque Ansari A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 3/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under SectionsProsecution. 376/448/511 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Mohamadganj P.S. Case no.14 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.778 of 2011. There is allegation against the petitioner to have attempted to commit rape upon the informant. From the FIR itself it is apparent that rape was not committed upon the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Jainath Yadav is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfa...
Krishna Machhua Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal ( DB) No. 336 of 2011 Krishna Machhua Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent -------Coram: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. MERATHIA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : APP -------Order No. 3 Dated the 10th October, 2011 No one appears on behalf of the appellant. However, the State counsel is present. Let express reminder be sent to learned A.C.J.M., Chaibasa for complying the order dated 15.06.2011. Put up this case after four weeks awaiting report. ..Appellant( R.K. Merathia, J) ( P.P. Bhatt, J)Rakesh/...
Upendra Narayan Singh Vs. Managing Director,jharkhand St
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.5568of2011 UpendraNarayanSingh... Versus 1.TheManagingDirector,JharkhandState Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., NepalHouseArea,Doranda,Ranchi 2. The General Manager (Finance), Jharkhand State Mineral Development CorporationLtd.,Doranda,Ranchi 3. The Chief of Finance, Jharkhand State MineralDevelopmentCorporationLimited, KhanijNigamBhavan,Doranda,Ranchi. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: M/s.J.Dubey,BrijBihariSinha FortheRespondents: Mr.SidharthRanjan,RupeshSingh th 03/Dated:10October,2011 1) Counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be for ... ... ... Petitionerdisposalofthiswritpetition,ifadirectionisgiventorespondentNo.1to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilatedinthiswritpetitionwithregardtoretiralbenefitsandothers, inaccordancewithlaw,withinstipulatedtime,asgivenbythisCourt. 2) Ihaveheardcounselfortherespondents,whohassubmittedthat theyhave...
Jaideo Hembram Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6574 of 2011 Jaideo Hembram Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. Durga Mishra A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 3/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 376 of theProsecution. Indian Penal Code, in connection with Masalia (Tongra) P.S. Case no.91 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No.1377 of 2010. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have committed rape upon the victim girl who is the informant in this case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail stands rejected. (H. C. Mishra, J)R.Kumar...
M/S Bihar Gases Limited and ors Vs. Industrial Development Bank of
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.4626of2011 M/sBiharGasesLimited,Deoghar&Ors....; ... ... Petitioners Versus IndustrialDevelopmentBankofIndia,Patna&Ors....; ...Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMRS.JUSTICEPOONAMSRIVASTAV :Mr.SachinKumar,Advocate :Mr.M.S.Mittal,Sr.AdvocateForthePetitioners FortheRespondents 03/10.10.2011Despitetimehavingbeengranted,nocounteraffidavithasbeenfiledtilldate ListthiscaseinthemonthofNovember,2011. Till the next date of listing, the interim order passed on 23.08.2011 shallonbehalfoftherespondents.continue. Manish (PoonamSrivastav,J.)...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›