Jharkhand Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ladura Balmuchu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHICr.M.P.No. 1660 of 2007. ----Ladura Balmuchu . ... .... . Versus The State of Jharkhand ....,. ...Petitioner Opp.Party.-----CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR -----For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S.Mazumdar. For the State : G.P.II -----08/10.10.2011 It is submitted by Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, learned this case has becomecounsel for the petitioner that infructuous. Accordingly, infructuous. thesameisdismissedas( Prashant Kumar,J.)Raman/...
Mabel Topno Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.5350of2011 MabelTopno ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Respondents Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers ... CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: Mr.MokhtarAhmad FortheRespondents: J.C.ToA.A.G. th 02/Dated:10October,2011 1) Counselforthepetitionersubmittedthatthepetitionerhasretired on31.8.2008andsheisnotgettingherretiralbenefitstilldate. 2) Counselfortherespondentsisseekingtimetofilecounteraffidavit. 3) Time,asprayedfor,isgranted. 4) Matterisadjournedtobeenlistedon14thNovember,2011. 5) Ifthecounteraffidavitisnotbytheaforesaiddate,Iherebydirect respondent No. 4 The District Education Officer, (West) Singhbhum, Chaibasa to remain physically present before this Courtat10.30A.M.Manoj/cp.0(D.N.Patel,J)...
Md.Akbar Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6568 of 2011 Md. Akbar Ansari Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. M.A. Khan A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 4/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under SectionsProsecution. 376/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chandil P.S. Case no. 60 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.415 of 2011. That there is direct allegation against the petitioner to have committed rape upon the victim. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail stands rejected. (H. C. Mishra, J)R.Kumar...
Kuddus @ Kuddus Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2641 of 2011 -----Kuddus @ Kuddus Ansari ... Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: -----.... ... ........ ...Petitioner Opp. PartyHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Complainant : Mr. P. Pranny, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----03 /10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is accused in a case registered under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the complaint that petitioner has demanded Rs.50,000/- from the parents of the complainant for which she was subjected to torture and finally driven out from her matrimonial home. It is submitted that the marriage was solemnised 15 years ago and out of the wed-lock the spouses are having four children. The allegation of demand of dowry and torture is false and baseless. Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the complainant was subjected...
Braj Kishore Singh Vs. M.D.,jharkhand State Mineral D
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.5399of2011 BrajKishoreSingh... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Managing Director, Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., NepalHouseArea,Doranda,Ranchi 2. TheGeneralManager(Finance),Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.,Doranda,Ranchi 3. The Chief of Finance, Jharkhand State MineralDevelopmentCorporationLimited, KhanijNigamBhavan,Doranda,Ranchi. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: M/s.J.Dubey,BrijBihariSinha FortheRespondents: Mr.SidharthRanjan,RupeshSingh th 02/Dated:10October,2011 1) Counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be fordisposalofthiswritpetition,ifadirectionisgiventorespondentNo.1to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilatedinthiswritpetitionwithregardtoretiralbenefitsandothers, inaccordancewithlaw,withinstipulatedtime,asgivenbythisCourt. 2) Ihaveheardcounselfortherespondents,whohassubmittedthat theyh...
Firu Munda and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6806 of 2011 1. Firu Munda 2. Faguwa @ Fagu Oraon Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi A. P.P. ..... PetitionersFor the Petitioners For the State 2/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 302/34Prosecution. of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Ghaghra P.S. Case no. 62 of 2007, corresponding to G.R. No.609 of 2007. The case relates to triple murder and from the impugned order it appears that the trial is going on and all the witnesses have been examined except the I.O. It also appears that some witnesses have supported the case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioners Firu Munda and Faguwa @ Fagu Oraon on bail. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as expedicious...
Naresh Singh @ Ram Naresh Singh and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2887 of 2011 -----1. Naresh Singh @ Ram Naresh Singh 2. Vidhu Devi 3. Rambrichh Singh Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: -----.... .... ........ ...Petitioners Opp. PartyHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pankaj, Advocate For the Opp. Party : A.P.P. ----02 /10.10.2011 As prayed, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.(D.N. Upadhyay, J.)NKC...
Shankar Oraon and anr Vs. Manoj Kumar Bhagat and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No.87 of 2009 .............. Versus Shiva Chandra Bhagat & Ors. ...... .............. Shankar Oraon & Anr. .......... ............ Appellants Respondents.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI .............. For the Appellants For the Respondents : Mr. P.K. Prasad, Sr. Advocate : .............5/10.10.2011: law :1)This appeal shall be heard on the following substantial question ofWhether the learned lower appellate court has committed serious error in reversing the finding of learned trial court on the issue of adverse possession without considering the effect of Exbt.2 coupled with the evidences of D.W.2, D.W.4 and D.W.6 which were taken into consideration by learned trial court for recording his finding Issue notice to the respondents by ordinary process as well as byregistered post with A/D for which requisites etc. must be filed in Court within a week, failing which this appeal, as against the respondents, shall stand dismissed...
Mariyana Topno Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.5349of2011 MariyanaTopno ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Respondents Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers ... CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: Mr.MokhtarAhmad FortheRespondents: J.C.ToA.A.G. 02/Dated:10October,2011 th 1) Counselforthepetitionersubmittedthatthepetitionerhasretired on31.1.2008andsheisnotgettingherretiralbenefitstilldate. 2) Counselfortherespondentsisseekingtimetofilecounteraffidavit. 3) Time,asprayedfor,isgranted. 4) Matterisadjournedtobeenlistedon14thNovember,2011. 5) Ifthecounteraffidavitisnotbytheaforesaiddate,Iherebydirect respondent No. 4 The District Education Officer, West) Singhbhum at Chaibsa to remain physically present before this Courtat10.30A.M.Manoj/cp.0(D.N.Patel,J)...
Kuldip Singh @ Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5950 of 2011 ------Kuldip Singh @ Kuldeep Singh Petitioner -Versus...... Opposite Party -----CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Chaturvedi, Advocate. For the State : Ms.Lily Sahay, A.P.P. -----3/ 10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Nagar Untari P.S case no.245 of 2008 corresponding to G.R No. 1262 of 2008 for the offence under Sections 326, 307, 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have fired upon the informant from almost point blank range, causing grievous injuries on the chest of the informant. In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner Kuldip Singh @ Kuldeep Singh is hereby rejected. The State of Jharkhand(H.C.Mishra, J.)B.S/...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »