Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sadar Co-Op. Group Housing Society vs Government of Nct of Delhi and A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1105/2024 and CM APPL. 4645/2024SADAR CO-OP. GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.K. Devesh and Mr. Jitesh Saluja, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 26.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition with further liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted. 3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn along with all pending applications. 4. All rights and contentions are left open. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 Nc/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:59:11...
Rohit Antil vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1138/2026ROHIT ANTIL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gagan Bhatnagar, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State. SI Ramesh Kumar, P.S. Mundka.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 26.02.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner essentially seeks permission to travel to Canada to be with his wife for a period of 90 days. It is stated that the petitioners wife is on a student visa in that country.2. The petitioner is facing trial in case FIR No. 0329/2016 dated27.08.2016 registered under sections 308/354/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Mundka, West Delhi. The matter is next listed before the learned trial court for prosecution evidence on 10.03.2026.3. Notice on this petition was issued vid order dated 10.02.2026.4. Mr. Nawal...
Nitin Sethi vs Antriksh Developers and Promoters Private Limited & Ors ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 108/2026 NITIN SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Samarth Kapoor, Adv. (through VC) versus ANTRIKSH DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritul Randon, Adv. for R-1,2&4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 26.02.2026 I.A. 4971/2026 1. This application is filed seeking withdrawal of the petition in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule & Ors. decided on 29.01.2026 INSC 92. 2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed. 3. The petition O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 108/2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. The next date of hearing in the petition i.e., 27.03.2026 stands cancelled. 5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application before the commercial court concerned under Section 29A for extension of the mandate.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 haThis is...
Ags Auto Wheels vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2091/2026 & CM APPL. 10232/2026 AGS AUTO WHEELS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Bajaj and Ms. Geetashi Chandna, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Mishra, SPC and Mr. Ashar Hussain, Advs. Mr. Akshit Mohan, GP Mr. Rajesh Katyal and Ms. Seema Katyal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions state that bids of allthe four bidders have been rejected, on one or the other ground. In that sense, the tender has become infructuous.2. The counsel for the petitioner states nothing further survives in thewrit petition.3. The petition and pending application are dismissed as withdrawn.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026rkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Cou...
Raj Kumar Mittal vs Jammu and Kashmir Bank and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~40 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 256/2026&CM APPL. 7106/2026 RAJ KUMAR MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusJAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 26.02.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, let the matter be again called at 02:30 PM.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/v At 03:15 P.M.3. At this stage, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being called twice. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 11:54:26...
Shailesh Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 416/2026 SHAILESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anoj Kumar Singh and Ms. Smridhi Babbar, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with Mr. Sunil Arya, Advocate.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6407/2026 (for withdrawal) & BAIL APPLN. 416/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this application seeking permission to withdraw the present bail application, and approach the learned Trial Court for appropriate relief in view of subsequent development, by way of filing of a chargesheet. 2. In view thereof, the application is allowed, and BAIL APPLN. 416/2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. The next date of hearing, i.e., 03.03.2026 stands cancelled.PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 SS/JM/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code s...
Preety Kumar & Ors. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14/2021 and CM APPL. 49/2021 Date of Decision: 26.02.2026IN THE MATTER OF:PREETY KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raghav Sabharwal and Ms. Avni Sharma, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA .....RespondentThrough: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC, Ms. Nandini Aggarwal and Ms. Samiksha, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Rahul Sangwan, Advocate for R- 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. The petition seeks for the following relief:(i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the Notice dated September 29, 2020, under section 206(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 and he summoning Order dated December 28, 2020, under section 207 (3)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013, issued by Respondent through Dy. Registrar of Companies, Ms. Kamna Sharma, and any other proceeding including the proceeding dated October 19, 2020, by the RoC, Delh...
Manish Auto World vs Assistant Commissioner, Gsto, Ward -69, Zone -3, ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1456/2026 MANISH AUTO WORLD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A. K. Seth, Ms. Palak Mathur & Mr. Karanveer Singh, Advs.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, GSTO, WARD -69, ZONE -3, DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Piyush Beriwal, Ms. Ruchita Srivastava, Ms. Neha Kamboj & Mr.Dev Aaseri, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 26.02.2026CM APPL.13168/2026 1. Present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the present petition. 2. In view of the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and disposed of. W.P.(C) 1456/2026 3. In view of the order passed today in CM APPL.13168/2026, permission is granted to withdraw the present petition. 4. As such, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from...
Manoj vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 572/2026, CRL.M.A. 5429/2026 MANOJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Advocate.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advocate with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocates for Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (Criminal) for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 26.02.2026Notice on this petition was issued on 17.02.2026. Status report is not on record. Mr. Kshitiz Garg, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Amol Sinha, learned ASC for the State has handed-up a report received from jail, which also encloses order dated 17.02.2026 passed by the concerned authorities rejecting the petitioners request for extension of parole. The same is taken on record. Upon considering the contents of the petition and the report received from jail, this court is also not inclined to grant any further extension of parole to the petitioner.W.P.(CRL) 572/20...
Rijak Singh @ Bholu vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 474/2026 RIJAK SINGH @ BHOLU .....Applicant Through: Mr. Pankaj Kapoor, Adv.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the StateCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 26.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the present application since the FIR No.529/2025 dated 03.10.2025 registered under Sections 115/126(2)/110/3(5) at PS.: Rajouri Garden, Delhi has already been quashed vide order dated 18.02.2026 passed by this Court itself in CRL.M.C. 1378/2026. 2. As such, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, J. FEBRUARY 26, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 11:51:29...